Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Oral Ladarixin in Recent Onset Type 1 Diabetes and a Low Residual β-cell Function (NCT NCT04628481)
NCT ID: NCT04628481
Last Updated: 2026-08-31
Results Overview
Change from baseline in the 2-hour C-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC) following a Mixed-Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Month 6. The analysis used an adjusted ANCOVA model with the change from baseline in log(AUC + 1) as the dependent variable. Qualitative independent variables included treatment group, age group, sex, and BMI group, with the baseline value as a quantitative covariate. Missing data at Month 6 were handled via multiple imputation using a retrieved dropout approach. Missing values were imputed using a regression model based on the participant's allocated treatment arm and baseline value, utilizing data from participants who discontinued treatment but completed the Month 6 measurement. Baseline is defined as the last visit prior to randomization. Change from Baseline is defined as post-baseline visit value minus baseline visit value. The adjusted mean along with its the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) has been presented.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
289 participants
Baseline and at Month 6
2026-08-31
Participant Flow
A total of 141 participants were randomized in the study and 140 participants received treatment.
There was a run-in period to allow the start of ladarixin dosing within 180 days from the first insulin injection, followed by randomization. Of the 141 participants randomized, one participant did not receive the study treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Ladarixin
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Run-in
The run-in period included 2 or more visits scheduled to allow investigational product to start within 180 days from the first insulin injection.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Run-in Period (180 Days)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
289
|
|
Run-in Period (180 Days)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
141
|
|
Run-in Period (180 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
148
|
|
Treatment Period (12 Months)
STARTED
|
46
|
95
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period (12 Months)
COMPLETED
|
26
|
65
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period (12 Months)
NOT COMPLETED
|
20
|
30
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Ladarixin
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Run-in
The run-in period included 2 or more visits scheduled to allow investigational product to start within 180 days from the first insulin injection.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Run-in Period (180 Days)
Failure to meet continuation criteria
|
0
|
0
|
131
|
|
Run-in Period (180 Days)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Run-in Period (180 Days)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Run-in Period (180 Days)
Protocol-specific withdrawal criterion met
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Run-in Period (180 Days)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
|
Treatment Period (12 Months)
Discontinuation criteria met
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period (12 Months)
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period (12 Months)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
12
|
14
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period (12 Months)
Physician Decision
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period (12 Months)
Pregnancy
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period (12 Months)
Unavailable due to travel (abroad)
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period (12 Months)
Study terminated by sponsor
|
2
|
7
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Oral Ladarixin in Recent Onset Type 1 Diabetes and a Low Residual β-cell Function
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=94 Participants
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Total
n=140 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
26.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=14 Participants
|
26.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=36 Participants
|
26.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=324 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
37 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=324 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
57 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=324 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=324 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
92 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=324 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=324 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=324 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=324 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Month 6Population: Full Analysis Set
Change from baseline in the 2-hour C-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC) following a Mixed-Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) at Month 6. The analysis used an adjusted ANCOVA model with the change from baseline in log(AUC + 1) as the dependent variable. Qualitative independent variables included treatment group, age group, sex, and BMI group, with the baseline value as a quantitative covariate. Missing data at Month 6 were handled via multiple imputation using a retrieved dropout approach. Missing values were imputed using a regression model based on the participant's allocated treatment arm and baseline value, utilizing data from participants who discontinued treatment but completed the Month 6 measurement. Baseline is defined as the last visit prior to randomization. Change from Baseline is defined as post-baseline visit value minus baseline visit value. The adjusted mean along with its the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) has been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=94 Participants
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 2-hour Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of C-peptide Response to the Mixed Model Tolerance Test (MMTT)
|
-0.284 nanomole*hour/Liter (nmol*hr/L)
Interval -0.453 to -0.114
|
-0.151 nanomole*hour/Liter (nmol*hr/L)
Interval -0.373 to 0.071
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Months 12, 18, and 24Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at specified time points have been presented.
Change from baseline in the 2-hour C-peptide AUC following a MMTT at Months 6, 12, and 18. The analysis used an adjusted ANCOVA model with the change from baseline in log(AUC + 1) as the dependent variable. Qualitative independent variables included treatment group, age group, sex, and BMI group, with the baseline value as a quantitative covariate. Missing data at Months 12, 18 and 24 were handled via multiple imputation using a retrieved dropout approach. Missing values were imputed using a regression model based on the participant's allocated treatment arm and baseline value, utilizing data from participants who discontinued treatment but completed the measurement at the timepoint of interest. Intermediate timepoints were included as covariates in the model. Baseline is defined as the last visit prior to randomization. Change from Baseline is defined as post-baseline visit value minus baseline visit value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=94 Participants
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 2-hour AUC of C-peptide Response to the MMTT at Months 12, 18, and 24
Month 12
|
-0.426 nmol*hr/L
Interval -0.767 to -0.084
|
-0.447 nmol*hr/L
Interval -0.948 to 0.054
|
|
Change From Baseline in 2-hour AUC of C-peptide Response to the MMTT at Months 12, 18, and 24
Month 18
|
-0.574 nmol*hr/L
Interval -0.991 to -0.157
|
-0.524 nmol*hr/L
Interval -1.163 to 0.114
|
|
Change From Baseline in 2-hour AUC of C-peptide Response to the MMTT at Months 12, 18, and 24
Month 24
|
-0.661 nmol*hr/L
Interval -8.201 to 6.88
|
-0.843 nmol*hr/L
Interval -14.345 to 12.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at specified time points have been presented.
The change from baseline in HbA1c was analyzed using an adjusted ANCOVA model. The dependent variable is the change from baseline in HbA1c at each respective time point, with treatment, age group, sex, and BMI group as qualitative independent variables and the baseline value as a quantitative covariate. . Missing data are addressed via Multiple Imputation (MI) using a retrieved dropout approach, where values are imputed based on a regression model incorporating treatment arm, baseline value, and intermediate assessments as covariates. Baseline is defined as the last visit prior to randomization. Change from Baseline is defined as post-baseline visit value minus baseline visit value. The adjusted mean along with its the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) has been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=94 Participants
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline
Month 24
|
-0.007 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Interval -1.383 to 1.369
|
0.080 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Interval -1.823 to 1.982
|
|
Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline
Month 6
|
0.500 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Interval -0.668 to 1.667
|
0.032 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Interval -1.881 to 1.944
|
|
Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline
Month 12
|
-0.267 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Interval -0.681 to 0.148
|
-0.280 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Interval -0.779 to 0.219
|
|
Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline
Month 18
|
-0.031 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Interval -0.713 to 0.652
|
-0.180 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Interval -1.074 to 0.714
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 6, 12, 18, and 24Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at specified time points have been presented.
The proportion of participants with HbA1c \< 7% was calculated by timepoint: the numerator was the number of participants with events occurring at a specific timepoint (month X visit), without cumulating participants with events up to that timepoint. Participants with severe hypoglycemic events were considered cumulatively and only events up to month 12 were considered (condition was evaluated by considering treatment period only). If HbA1c ≥ 7% or the participant had experienced a severe hypoglycemic event, then the endpoint was equal to "No" even in the case of one missing component. If either the HbA1c or severe hypoglycemic event data was missing, but the other satisfied the criteria for the endpoint, then the response to the endpoint was missing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=79 Participants
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% Who Did Not Experience Severe Hypoglycemic Events During Treatment
Month 12
|
46.2 percentage of participants
|
39.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% Who Did Not Experience Severe Hypoglycemic Events During Treatment
Month 6
|
44.3 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% Who Did Not Experience Severe Hypoglycemic Events During Treatment
Month 18
|
44.1 percentage of participants
|
48.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% Who Did Not Experience Severe Hypoglycemic Events During Treatment
Month 24
|
41.0 percentage of participants
|
40.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 6, 12, 18, and 24Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at specified time points have been presented.
The average daily insulin requirement at each visit was calculated from the daily insulin requirement measured at the 3 days prior to the visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=85 Participants
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=37 Participants
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average (Previous 3 Days) Daily Insulin Requirement International Units Per Kilogram Per Day (IU/kg/Day)
Month 12
|
0.41 IU/Kg/Day
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
0.39 IU/Kg/Day
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
|
Average (Previous 3 Days) Daily Insulin Requirement International Units Per Kilogram Per Day (IU/kg/Day)
Month 6
|
0.39 IU/Kg/Day
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
0.34 IU/Kg/Day
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
|
Average (Previous 3 Days) Daily Insulin Requirement International Units Per Kilogram Per Day (IU/kg/Day)
Month 18
|
0.43 IU/Kg/Day
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
0.47 IU/Kg/Day
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
|
Average (Previous 3 Days) Daily Insulin Requirement International Units Per Kilogram Per Day (IU/kg/Day)
Month 24
|
0.47 IU/Kg/Day
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
0.46 IU/Kg/Day
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 6, 12, 18, and 24Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at specified time points have been presented.
Percentage of participants with HbA1c \<7% and daily insulin requirement \<0.5 (IU/Kg/day) was calculated for each time point, the numerator is the number of participants in each treatment group with events occurring at a specific timepoint, and the denominator is the number of participants in each treatment group reaching the specific visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=81 Participants
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% and Daily Insulin Requirement <0.5 IU/kg/Day
Month 24
|
43.8 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% and Daily Insulin Requirement <0.5 IU/kg/Day
Month 6
|
59.3 percentage of participants
|
61.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% and Daily Insulin Requirement <0.5 IU/kg/Day
Month 12
|
58.2 percentage of participants
|
48.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% and Daily Insulin Requirement <0.5 IU/kg/Day
Month 18
|
57.4 percentage of participants
|
44.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-baseline up to Month 24Population: Full Analysis Set
This outcome assessed the total number of self-reported episodes of severe hypoglycemia occurring across all participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=94 Participants
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Self-reported Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
|
278 Number of events
|
76 Number of events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Full Analysis Set
This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who did not require an insulin therapy at the timepoint of interest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=94 Participants
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients Not Requiring Insulin Therapy
Month 6
|
1.2 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients Not Requiring Insulin Therapy
Month 12
|
0 percentage of participants
|
2.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients Not Requiring Insulin Therapy
Month 18
|
0 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients Not Requiring Insulin Therapy
Month 24
|
0 percentage of participants
|
4.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 6, 12, 18, and 24Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants with data available at specified time points have been presented.
Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate (eGDR) is a marker for the Assessment of Insulin Resistance and a validated clinical tool for estimating insulin sensitivity in type 1 diabetes. The eGDR was calculated using a formula incorporating Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c), hypertension status (blood pressure), and the Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR), with results expressed in milligrams per kilogram per minute (mg/kg/min).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=78 Participants
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=35 Participants
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
|---|---|---|
|
Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate (eGDR)
Month 12
|
9.37 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 3.14
|
7.89 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 4.77
|
|
Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate (eGDR)
Month 6
|
9.56 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 3.01
|
8.26 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 4.52
|
|
Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate (eGDR)
Month 18
|
9.64 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
8.78 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
|
Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate (eGDR)
Month 24
|
9.29 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 3.36
|
8.72 mg/kg/min
Standard Deviation 3.17
|
Adverse Events
Ladarixin
Placebo
Run-in
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=94 participants at risk
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=46 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Run-in
n=289 participants at risk
The run-in period included 2 or more visits scheduled to allow investigational product to start within 180 days from the first insulin injection.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
|
1.1%
1/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ladarixin
n=94 participants at risk
Participants received 400 milligrams (mg) of Ladarixin twice daily (b.i.d.) for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Placebo
n=46 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo b.i.d. for 13 cycles of 14 days on/14 days off
|
Run-in
n=289 participants at risk
The run-in period included 2 or more visits scheduled to allow investigational product to start within 180 days from the first insulin injection.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
26.6%
25/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
19.6%
9/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
18.1%
17/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
10.6%
10/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
8.5%
8/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
5.3%
5/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
5.3%
5/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
2.1%
2/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
18.1%
17/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
5.3%
5/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.3%
5/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.69%
2/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.3%
5/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
5.3%
5/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
8.5%
8/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
11.7%
11/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.35%
1/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
11.7%
11/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
1.7%
5/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
9.6%
9/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.3%
5/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
8.7%
4/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.3%
5/94 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
0.00%
0/289 • Up to Month 24
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were collected in Safety Analysis Set. which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. The serious AEs reported were not considered related to the investigational drug by the investigator.
|
Additional Information
Clinical Development & Operations
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place