Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Immunotherapy (Sasanlimab) in Combination With Targeted Therapies in People With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (Landscape 1011 Study) (NCT NCT04585815)
NCT ID: NCT04585815
Last Updated: 2026-01-09
Results Overview
DLT=AEs in DLT observation period (OP) related to any study intervention:Grade (G)4 neutropenia;thrombocytopenia or anemia;febrile neutropenia;neutropenic infection;G3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding. Any G\>=3 toxicity (except transient G3 fatigue, local reactions/headache that resolved to G\<=1/baseline; G3 nausea, vomiting controlled within 72 hrs, G3 hypertension controlled by medical therapy (MT), G3 diarrhea that improved to G\<=2 within 72 hrs, G3 skin toxicity that resolved to G\<=1 in \<7 days after MT, G3 endocrinopathies controlled by MT and tumors flare); Non-hematologic G3 lab abnormality \[LA\](medical intervention or hospitalization), or any G4 LA;ALT/AST\>3\*ULN (normal at baseline) or \>3\*ULN and doubling baseline (\>ULN at baseline) and associated with total bilirubin(TB) \>2\*ULN;or ALT/AST\>5\*ULN; or TB\>3\*ULN. Missing 75% of planned doses during DLT OP due to treatment-related toxicities. AE not listed/DLT criteria outside DLT OP was DLT at discretion of sponsor and investigator.
TERMINATED
PHASE1/PHASE2
34 participants
Day 1 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1
2026-01-09
Participant Flow
Sub-study A (SSA) was planned to be conducted in 2 parts: Phase 1b and Phase 2. Due to a business decision, Phase 2 was not initiated, hence no participants were enrolled for Phase 2 of SSA. Sub-study B (SSB) was conducted in 2 parts: Phase 1b and Phase 2.
57 participants signed informed consent and 34 participants were enrolled in the study. Of these 34 participants, 13 were enrolled in Sub-study A and 21 in Sub-study B (9 in Phase \[Ph\] 1b and 12 in Phase 2).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225 mg) + Axitinib (5 mg)
Participants with NSCLC and who received any line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225mg) + Axitinib (5 mg) + SEA-TGT(1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC and who received any line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W intravenous (IV) infusion of 1 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC PD-L1: TPS 1-49% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC with who were treatment-naïve for advanced/metastatic disease with low programmed death ligand - 1 (PD-L1) levels Tumor proportion score (TPS)-49 percent (%) were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=50% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC with who were treatment-naïve for advanced/metastatic disease with high PD-L1 (TPS greater than or equal to \[\>=\]50%) were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA+ TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sub-study A- Treatment Phase
STARTED
|
4
|
9
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Treatment Phase
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Treatment Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
9
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Follow-up Phase
STARTED
|
2
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Follow-up Phase
COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Follow-up Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study B- Treatment Phase
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
3
|
2
|
7
|
|
Sub-study B- Treatment Phase
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study B- Treatment Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
3
|
2
|
7
|
|
Sub-study B- Follow-up Phase
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
6
|
|
Sub-study B- Follow-up Phase
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
|
Sub-study B- Follow-up Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225 mg) + Axitinib (5 mg)
Participants with NSCLC and who received any line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225mg) + Axitinib (5 mg) + SEA-TGT(1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC and who received any line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W intravenous (IV) infusion of 1 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC PD-L1: TPS 1-49% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC with who were treatment-naïve for advanced/metastatic disease with low programmed death ligand - 1 (PD-L1) levels Tumor proportion score (TPS)-49 percent (%) were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=50% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC with who were treatment-naïve for advanced/metastatic disease with high PD-L1 (TPS greater than or equal to \[\>=\]50%) were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA+ TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sub-study A- Treatment Phase
Adverse Event
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Treatment Phase
Death
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Treatment Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Treatment Phase
Global deterioration of health status
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Treatment Phase
Progressive disease
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Treatment Phase
Study terminated by sponsor
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Treatment Phase
Other
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Follow-up Phase
Death
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study A- Follow-up Phase
Study terminated by sponsor
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study B- Treatment Phase
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Sub-study B- Treatment Phase
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study B- Treatment Phase
Progressive disease
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
|
Sub-study B- Treatment Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Sub-study B- Treatment Phase
Global deterioration of health status
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study B- Treatment Phase
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sub-study B- Follow-up Phase
Death
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
|
Sub-study B- Follow-up Phase
Study terminated by sponsor
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Immunotherapy (Sasanlimab) in Combination With Targeted Therapies in People With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (Landscape 1011 Study)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225 mg) + Axitinib (5 mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with NSCLC and who received any line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225mg) + Axitinib (5 mg) + SEA-TGT(1mg/kg)
n=6 Participants
Participants with NSCLC and who received any line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC PD-L1: TPS 1-49% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with who were treatment-naïve for advanced/metastatic disease with low PD-L1 levels TPS-49 % were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=50% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with who were treatment-naïve for advanced/metastatic disease with high PD-L1 (TPS \>=50%) were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA+ TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Total
n=34 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
2 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=205 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=83 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=576 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1Population: DLT-evaluable analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Phase 1b and either experienced DLT during the DLT-observation period or completed the DLT-observation period without DLT.
DLT=AEs in DLT observation period (OP) related to any study intervention:Grade (G)4 neutropenia;thrombocytopenia or anemia;febrile neutropenia;neutropenic infection;G3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding. Any G\>=3 toxicity (except transient G3 fatigue, local reactions/headache that resolved to G\<=1/baseline; G3 nausea, vomiting controlled within 72 hrs, G3 hypertension controlled by medical therapy (MT), G3 diarrhea that improved to G\<=2 within 72 hrs, G3 skin toxicity that resolved to G\<=1 in \<7 days after MT, G3 endocrinopathies controlled by MT and tumors flare); Non-hematologic G3 lab abnormality \[LA\](medical intervention or hospitalization), or any G4 LA;ALT/AST\>3\*ULN (normal at baseline) or \>3\*ULN and doubling baseline (\>ULN at baseline) and associated with total bilirubin(TB) \>2\*ULN;or ALT/AST\>5\*ULN; or TB\>3\*ULN. Missing 75% of planned doses during DLT OP due to treatment-related toxicities. AE not listed/DLT criteria outside DLT OP was DLT at discretion of sponsor and investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Percentage of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
|
—
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapyPopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
Durable ORR was defined as percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1 based on investigator assessment, lasting for at least 10 months from the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of disease progression (PD), death, or start of new anticancer therapy. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 millimeter \[mm\]). PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD was defined as 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 21 of Cycle 1Population: DLT-evaluable analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Phase 1b and either experienced DLT during the DLT-observation period or completed the DLT-observation period without DLT.
DLT=AEs in DLT OP related to any study intervention: G4 neutropenia; thrombocytopenia or anemia; neutropenia; neutropenic infection; G3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding. Any G\>=3 toxicity (except transient G3 fatigue, local reactions/headache that resolved to G\<=1/baseline; G3 nausea, vomiting controlled within 72 hrs, G3 hypertension controlled by MT, G3 diarrhea that improved to G\<=2 within 72 hrs, G3 skin toxicity that resolved to G\<=1 in \<7 days after MT, G3 endocrinopathies controlled by MT and tumors flare); Non-hematologic G3 LA (medical intervention or hospitalization), or any G4 LA;ALT/AST\>3\*ULN (normal at baseline) or \>3\*ULN and doubling baseline (\>ULN at baseline) and associated with TB \>2\*ULN; or ALT/AST\>5\*ULN; or TB\>3\*ULN. Missing 75% of planned doses during DLT OP due to treatment-related toxicities. AE not listed/DLT criteria outside DLT OP was DLT at discretion of sponsor and investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=6 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Percentage of Participants With DLT
|
—
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
1 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapy (maximum of 21 months)Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 based on investigator assessment, from the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapy. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 millimeter \[mm\]). PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD was defined as 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 Sub-Study B: Objective Response Rate
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 57.9
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.8 to 90.6
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 84.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)Population: Safety analysis set includes all participants who receive at least 1 dose of study drug.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs was graded by the investigator according to NCI CTCAE grade 1 to 5 version 5.0; where Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life-threatening and Grade 5=death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0
Grade 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0
Grade 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0
Grade 3
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0
Grade 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0
Grade 5
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatmentPopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs were planned to be graded by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version (v) 5.0; where Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life-threatening and Grade 5=death.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Hematology parameters included: anemia, hemoglobin increased, leukocytosis, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, leukocytosis, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, white blood cell decreased. Laboratory abnormalities were graded as per NCI- CTCAE v 5.0 where, grade(G) 0= non-missing lab value that does not meet either of G1 through 4 criteria, G1=mild, G2=moderate, G3=severe and G4= life-threatening or disabling. Baseline is defined as the last assessment prior to the date/time of the first dose of study treatment. Number of participants with shift from baseline in hematology parameters by grades (as per CTCAE version 5.0) were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is not applicable (NA) for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Gade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
00 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Chemistry parameters included: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, blood bilirubin increased, creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) increased, chronic kidney disease (CKD), creatinine increased, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, lipase increased, serum amylase increased. Chemistry abnormalities were graded as per NCI- CTCAE v 5.0 where, grade(G) 0= non-missing lab value that does not meet either of G1 through 4 criteria, G1=mild, G2=moderate, G3=severe and G4= life-threatening or disabling. Baseline is defined as the last assessment prior to the date/time of the first dose of study treatment. Number of participants with shift from baseline in hematology parameters by grades (as per CTCAE version 5.0) were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alanine aminotransferase increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Alkaline phosphatase increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Aspartate aminotransferase increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatmentPopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
Hematology and clinical chemistry parameters were planned to be assessed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapy (approximately 38.66 months)Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Durable ORR was defined as percentage of participants with confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 based on investigator assessment, lasting for at least 10 months from the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapy. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 milli meter \[mm\]). PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD was defined as 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. Non-CR/Non-PD: Persistence of any non-target lesions and/or tumor marker level (if being followed) above the normal limits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Durable Objective Response Rate (ORR)
|
—
|
25.0 Percentage of Participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
|
44.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 13.7 to 78.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapy (approximately 38.66 months)Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Objective response rate is defined as percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 from the date of first dose of study treatment until the date of the first documentation of PD. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 mm). PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD was defined as 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. Non-CR/Non-PD: Persistence of any non-target lesions and/or tumor marker level (if being followed) above the normal limits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Objective Response Rate
|
—
|
50.0 Percentage of Participants
Interval 6.8 to 93.2
|
44.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 13.7 to 78.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapyPopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
Objective response (OR) rate is defined as percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 from the date of first dose of study treatment until the date of the first documentation of PD. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 mm). PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first documentation of OR to the date of the first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred firstPopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
DR was defined for participants with confirmed OR as time from date of first documentation of OR to the date of first documentation of PD or death (any cause), whichever occurred first. OR=CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 based on investigator assessment. CR and PR must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no \<4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. CR=complete disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 mm). PR=greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions (TMLs). PD=20% increase in sum of diameters of TMLs above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of objective responsePopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
TTR is defined for participants with confirmed objective response as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) which was subsequently confirmed. CR=complete disappearance of all target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 mm). PR=greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred firstPopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD=20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause or censoring datePopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were planned to be censored at the date of last contact.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (pre-dose on Day 1, 168 hours [Day 8] and 336 hours [Day 15] and Day 28 post-dose) (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug (i.e., sasanlimab). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to the next dose.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUCtau) After Single Dose of Sasanlimab
|
—
|
12500 Micrograms*hour per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65
|
24850 Micrograms*hour per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (pre-dose on Day 1, 336 hours [Day 15] and Day 28 post-dose) (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (pre-dose on Day 1, 168 hours [Day 8],336 hours [Day 15] and Day 28 post-dose) and Cycle 5 (pre-dose on Day 1 and 168 hours [Day 8] post dose) (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug (i.e., sasanlimab). Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sasanlimab
Cycle 1
|
—
|
29.49 Micrograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55
|
45.04 Micrograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sasanlimab
Cycle 5
|
—
|
64.60 Micrograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated as a single participant was analyzed.
|
70.90 Micrograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated as a single participant was analyzed.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (pre-dose on Day 1, 336 hours [Day 15] and Day 28 post-dose) and Cycle 5 Day 1 (pre-dose) (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (pre-dose on Day 1, 168 hours [Day 8], 336 hours [Day 15] and Day 28 post-dose) and Cycle 5 (pre-dose on Day 1 and 168 hours [Day 8] post dose) (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug (i.e., sasanlimab). Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Sasanlimab
Cycle 1
|
—
|
164 Hour
Interval 144.0 to 168.0
|
209 Hour
Interval 143.0 to 359.0
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Sasanlimab
Cycle 5
|
—
|
168 Hour
Interval 168.0 to 168.0
|
162 Hour
Interval 162.0 to 162.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (pre-dose on Day 1, 336 hours [Day 15] and Day 28 post-dose) and Cycle 5 Day 1 (pre-dose) (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 5 Day 1 (pre-dose) (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug (i.e., sasanlimab). Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Sasanlimab
|
—
|
37.97 Microgram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20
|
40.24 Microgram per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 5 Day 1 (pre-dose) (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre-dose) of Cycle 1, 2 and 5; Day 15 of Cycle 1 (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. For 'Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)' arm, samples were not analyzed for Cycle 2 Day 1 as it was collected incorrectly due to time deviation for visits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Ctrough of Encorafenib
Cycle 1 Day 1
|
—
|
NA Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Data could not be calculated as values were below lower limit of quantification.
|
NA Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Data could not be calculated as values were below lower limit of quantification.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Ctrough of Encorafenib
Cycle 1 Day 15
|
—
|
12.2 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 176
|
18.5 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Ctrough of Encorafenib
Cycle 2 Day 1
|
—
|
—
|
11.1 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 204
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Ctrough of Encorafenib
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
—
|
5.0 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated for single participant
|
7.8 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 191
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 5 Day 1 (pre-dose)Population: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre-dose) of Cycles 1, 2, and 5 (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. Here, 'Overall Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Ctrough of Binimetinib
Cycle 2 Day 1
|
—
|
19.2 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
40.9 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 98
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Ctrough of Binimetinib
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
—
|
—
|
35.7 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 5 Day 1 (pre-dose)Population: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 until end of treatment (up to approximately 255 days) (1 cycle= 28 days)Population: Immunogenicity analysis set was a subset of the safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) and included participants who had at least 1 analyzed sasanlimab ADA/NAb sample. All participants included in 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluated for ADA and NAb respectively.
In this outcome measure, number of ADA-positive and NAb-positive participants has been presented. A participant was considered ADA (or NAb) positive if (1) baseline titer was missing or negative and participant had \>= 1 post-treatment positive titer (treatment-induced), or (2) positive titer at baseline and had a \>= \[4-fold dilution increase\] in titer (equivalent to 0.602 unit increase in logarithm to base 10 (log10) titer from baseline in \>= 1 post-treatment sample (treatment-boosted).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Against Sasanlimab
ADA
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study A: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Against Sasanlimab
NAb
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 until end of treatmentPopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapyPopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and no data was collected.
OR rate is defined as percentage of participants with CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 based on investigator assessment. CR=complete disappearance of all target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 mm). PR=greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. OR by PD-L1 expression at baseline was planned to be assessed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatmentPopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and there was no data collection for it.
EORTC QLQ-C30: consisted of 30 questions grouped into 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health status/global quality of life scale; 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting); and 6 single items that assessed additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, and diarrhea), and financial impact. All scales and single item measures ranged in score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the global health status/quality of life scale represent higher health status/quality of life. Higher scores on the functional scales represent higher levels of functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales and single items represent a greater presence of symptoms or financial impact.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatmentPopulation: Due to a business decision, no participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of sub-study A. Hence, Phase 2 was not initiated and there was no data collection for it.
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is the lung cancer specific module of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 consisted of 13 questions which included 1 multi-item scale and 9 single items assessing symptoms (dyspnea, cough, hemoptysis, and site specific pain), side effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia), and pain medication use. The item scale ranged from 1 to 4 (1 = Not at all; 4 = Very Much) where the EORTC-QLQ-LC13 scoring algorithm was applied to convert to a 0 to 100 point scale where 100 is best quality of life (QOL), for comparability. Higher scores are reflective of a greater presence of symptoms.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs were graded by the investigator according to NCI CTCAE version 5.0; where Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life-threatening and Grade 5=death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=6 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded According to NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0
Grade 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded According to NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0
Grade 2
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded According to NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0
Grade 3
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded According to NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0
Grade 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded According to NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0
Grade 5
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs were graded by the investigator according to NCI CTCAE version 5.0; where Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life-threatening and Grade 5=death
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded According to NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0
Grade 2
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded According to NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0
Grade 3
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded According to NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0
Grade 4
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded According to NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0
Grade 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded According to NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0
Grade 1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 39.3 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Hematology parameters included: anemia, hemoglobin increased, leukocytosis, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, white blood cell decreased. Laboratory abnormalities were graded as per NCI- CTCAE v 5.0 where, grade(G) 0= non-missing lab value that does not meet either of G1 through 4 criteria, G1=mild, G2=moderate, G3=severe and G4= life-threatening or disabling. Baseline is defined as the last assessment prior to the date/time of the first dose of study treatment. Number of participants with shift from baseline in hematology parameters by grades (as per CTCAE version 5.0) were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=6 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
00 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood cell decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Chemistry parameters included: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, blood bilirubin increased, creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) increased, chronic kidney disease (CKD), creatinine increased, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, lipase increased, serum amylase increased. Chemistry abnormalities were graded as per NCI- CTCAE v 5.0 where, grade(G) 0= non-missing lab value that does not meet either of G1 through 4 criteria, G1=mild, G2=moderate, G3=severe and G4= life-threatening or disabling. Baseline is defined as the last assessment prior to the date/time of the first dose of study treatment. Number of participants with shift from baseline in hematology parameters by grades (as per CTCAE version 5.0) were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=6 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
00 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
—
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 0
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Hematology parameters included: anemia, hemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count decreased, leukocytosis, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, white blood cell decreased. Number of participants with shift from baseline in hematology parameters by grades as per CTCAE version 5.0 were reported. Grade 0= non-missing lab value that does not meet either of Grade 1 through 4 criteria; Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 0
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Anemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for anemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hemoglobin increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 4 is NA for hemoglobin increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 0 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 1 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 2 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Leukocytosis · Grade 4 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) and Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions, therefore Grades 1, 2 and 4 are NA for Leukocytosis.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lymphocyte count increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 4 are not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank), therefore, Grades 1 and 4 are NA for lymphocyte count increased.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 0 to 0
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
00 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Neutrophil count decrease · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 0 to 1
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Platelet count decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 0 to 0
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematology Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
White blood Cell decreased · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows.
Chemistry parameters included: ALT increased, ALP increased, AST increased, blood bilirubin increased, chronic kidney disease, creatinine increased, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, lipase increased, serum amylase increased. Number of participants with maximum CTCAE V5.0 grade in chemistry parameters were reported. Grade 0= non-missing lab value that does not meet either of Grade 1 through 4 criteria; Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 1 and Grade 2 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 1 is NA and values that could meet Grade 1 or Grade 2 criteria are presented as Grade 2 for hypokalemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypokalemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 0
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypomagnesemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 0
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 3
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 2 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 and Grade 3 are only distinguishable by non-quantitative conditions therefore Grade 2 is NA and values that could meet Grade 2 or Grade 3 criteria are presented as Grade 3 for hyponatremia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Chronic kidney disease · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
00 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Creatinine increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
00 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypercalcemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyperkalemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 2 is not defined in CTCAE (i.e. Blank) therefore Grade 2 is NA for hypermagnesemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypermagnesemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 0
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypernatremia · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hyponatremia · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Lipase increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Serum amylase increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALT increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
ALP increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 0 to 0
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 0 to 1
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 0 to 4
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
AST increase · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Blood bilirubin increased · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 0
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 0
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
CPK increased · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoalbuminemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
NA Participants
Grade 4 only includes non-quantitative conditions; therefore Grade 4 is NA for hypoalbuminemia.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 2 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 3 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypocalcemia · Grade 4 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 0
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 0 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 1 to 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter Values Based on CTCAE V5.0
Hypoglycemia · Grade 2 to 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first (maximum of 21 months)Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 based on investigator assessment, from the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapy. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 mm). PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD was defined as 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. Two sided 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=6 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Objective Response Rate
|
—
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 70.8
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first documentation of OR to the date of first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first (maximum of 21 months)Population: Data was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants (with events) evaluable for this outcome measure.
DR was defined for participants with confirmed objective response (OR) as time from date of first documentation of OR to the date of first documentation of PD or death (any cause), whichever occurred first. OR=CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 based on investigator assessment. CR and PR must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no \<4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. CR=complete disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 mm). PR=greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions (TMLs). PD=20% increase in sum of diameters of TMLs above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum of 21 months)Population: Data was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants (with events) evaluable for this outcome measure.
TTR is defined for participants with confirmed objective response as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) which was subsequently confirmed. CR=complete disappearance of all target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 mm). PR=greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum of 21 months)Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD=20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=6 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
|
—
|
3.6 Months
Interval 0.7 to
Upper limit of 95% CI could not be calculated due to insufficient number of participants with event.
|
6.5 Months
Interval 3.6 to
Upper limit of 95% CI could not be calculated due to insufficient number of participants with event.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of first documentation of OR to the date of first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first (maximum of 21 months)Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and included only those participants with confirmed OR.'
DR was defined for participants with confirmed OR as time from date of first documentation of OR to the date of first documentation of PD or death (any cause), whichever occurred first. OR=CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 based on investigator assessment. CR and PR must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no \<4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. CR=complete disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 mm). PR=greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions (TMLs). PD=20% increase in sum of diameters of TMLs above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Duration of Response (DR)
|
5.8 Months
95% CI could not be calculated because there was only one patient analyzed.
|
NA Months
Median and 95% CI could not be calculated as the only participant analyzed did not have an event of interest.
|
NA Months
Median and 95% CI could not be calculated as the only participant analyzed did not have an event of interest.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum of 21 months)Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
TTR is defined for participants with confirmed OR as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) which was subsequently confirmed. CR=complete disappearance of all target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 mm). PR=greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Time to Tumor Response (TTR)
|
1.4 Months
Interval 1.4 to 1.4
|
4.1 Months
Interval 4.1 to 4.1
|
1.3 Months
Interval 1.3 to 1.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum of 21 months)Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD=20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
|
3.4 Months
Interval 1.4 to
Upper limit of 95% CI could not be calculated due to insufficient participants with event.
|
4.2 Months
Interval 4.0 to
Upper limit of 95% CI could not be calculated due to insufficient participants with event.
|
NA Months
Interval 2.8 to
Median and upper limit of 95% CI could not be calculated due to insufficient participants with event.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause or censoring date, whichever occurred first (maximum of 21 months)Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were planned to be censored at the date of last contact.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Overall Survival (OS)
|
4.0 Months
Upper and lower limits of 95% CI could not be calculated due to insufficient participants with event.
|
NA Months
Median and 95% CI could not be calculated due to insufficient participants with event.
|
NA Months
Median and 95% CI could not be calculated due to insufficient participants with event.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose, 168 hours post-dose on Day 1, Cycle 5: pre-dose, 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug (i.e., sasanlimab). Here, ''Number of Participants Analyzed'' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Sasanlimab
Cycle 1
|
—
|
8840 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 127
|
11570 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 79
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Sasanlimab
Cycle 5
|
—
|
23080 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
47340 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose on Day 1, Day 8 and 3 hours post-dose on Day 1; Cycle 5: pre-dose on Day 1, Day 8 and 3 hours post-dose on Day 1 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. Here, ''Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and contributed date to the table. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=5 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Axitinib
Cycle 1 Day 1
|
—
|
5.094 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
22.81 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Axitinib
Cycle 1 Day 8
|
—
|
3.440 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
13.74 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 106
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Axitinib
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
—
|
—
|
33.79 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 73
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Axitinib
Cycle 5 Day 8
|
—
|
13.10 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
24.85 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose, 168 hours post-dose on Day 1, Cycle 5: pre-dose, 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set: subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. ''Number of Participants Analyzed'': participants evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number Analyzed': participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Data for only those participants who received SEA-TGT were planned to be reported for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=5 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Cmax of SEA-TGT
Cycle 1
|
—
|
42550 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 109
|
—
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Cmax of SEA-TGT
Cycle 5
|
—
|
32660 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose, 168 hours post-dose on Day 1, Cycle 5: pre-dose, 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Sasanlimab
Cycle 1
|
10350 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45
|
11780 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45
|
13810 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Sasanlimab
Cycle 5
|
20600 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
—
|
43500 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose on Day 1, Day 8 and 3 hours post-dose on Day 1; Cycle 5: pre-dose on Day 1, Day 8 and 3 hours post-dose on Day 1 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=6 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Axitinib
Cycle 1 Day 1
|
11.18 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 112
|
37.43 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 85
|
18.23 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Axitinib
Cycle 1 Day 8
|
2.708 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 132
|
39.50 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
2.360 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Cmax of Axitinib
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
7.710 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
—
|
11.10 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose, 168 hours post-dose on Day 1, Cycle 5: pre-dose, 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Cmax of SEA-TGT
Cycle 1
|
30590 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39
|
36970 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36
|
35500 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Cmax of SEA-TGT
Cycle 5
|
44900 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
—
|
43000 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 5 Day 1 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. Here, 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Sasanlimab
Cycle 5
|
—
|
23000 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
23170 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Day 8; pre-dose on Cycle 5 Day 1 and Day 8 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Axitinib
Cycle 1 Day 8
|
—
|
3.440 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
13.74 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 106
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Axitinib
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
—
|
—
|
29.42 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Axitinib
Cycle 5 Day 8
|
—
|
13.10 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
24.85 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1; pre-dose on Cycle 5 Day 1 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set: subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters measured. 'Number of Participants Analyzed': participants evaluable for this outcome measure, 'Number Analyzed': participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Data for only those participants who received SEA-TGT were planned to be reported hence Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225 mg) + Axitinib (5 mg) arm was not reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of SEA-TGT
Cycle 5
|
—
|
4813 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose on Day 1, Cycle 5: pre-dose on Day 1 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set: subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. 'Number of Participants Analyzed': participants with evaluable data for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed': participants evaluable at specified time points. This outcome measure was not applicable for participants of ''Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS 1-49%''
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Sasanlimab
Cycle 1
|
87.01 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
—
|
—
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Sasanlimab
Cycle 5
|
20000 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
—
|
30400 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Day 8; pre-dose on Cycle 5 Day 1 and Day 8 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set was subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. Here, 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=4 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Axitinib
Cycle 1 Day 8
|
2.708 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 132
|
39.50 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
2.360 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of Axitinib
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
3.630 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1; pre-dose on Cycle 5 Day 1 (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: PK parameter analysis set: subset of safety analysis set (participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug) with participants who had at least 1 of PK parameters of interest for measured analytes related to study drug. Here 'Number of Participants Analyzed': participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed': participants evaluable at specified time points. This outcome measure was not applicable for participants of ''Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS 1-49%''
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=1 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of SEA-TGT
Cycle 1
|
24.47 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation could not be calculated as at least 3 values were required and this criterion could not be fulfilled due to lack of available data.
|
—
|
55.00 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Pre-dose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) of SEA-TGT
Cycle 5
|
8490 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
—
|
5770 Nanograms per milliliter
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric Coefficient of Variation could not be calculated for single participant.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 until end of treatment (up to approximately 21 months) (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: Immunogenicity analysis set included participants who had at least 1 analyzed sasanlimab ADA/NAb sample. Here ''Number analyzed'' signifies number of participants with at least one post-treatment ADA result for respective category.
A participant was considered ADA (or NAb) positive if (1) baseline titer was missing or negative and participant had \>= 1 post-treatment positive titer (treatment-induced), or (2) positive titer at baseline and had a \>= \[4-fold dilution increase\] in titer (equivalent to 0.602 unit increase in logarithm to base 10 (log10) titer from baseline in \>= 1 post-treatment sample (treatment-boosted).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=6 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Against Sasanlimab and SEA-TGT
ADA against sasanlimab
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Phase 1b of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Against Sasanlimab and SEA-TGT
ADA against SEA-TGT
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 until end of treatment (up to approximately 21 months) (1 cycle= 21 days)Population: Immunogenicity analysis set included participants who had at least 1 analyzed sasanlimab ADA/NAb sample.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Against Sasanlimab and SEA-TGT
ADA against sasanlimab
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Against Sasanlimab and SEA-TGT
ADA against SEA-TGT
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of PD, death, or start of new anticancer therapy (maximum of 21 months)Population: Full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with confirmed CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 based on investigator assessment, from the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of disease progression (PD), death, or start of new anticancer therapy. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10 millimeter \[mm\]). PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. PD was defined as 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 Participants
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=3 Participants
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with once daily (QD) oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and twice daily (BID) oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=2 Participants
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 of Sub-Study B: Objective Response Rate by PD-L1 Expression in Available Tumor Tissue
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 57.9
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.8 to 90.6
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 84.2
|
Adverse Events
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225 mg) + Axitinib (5 mg)
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225mg) + Axitinib (5 mg) + SEA-TGT(1mg/kg)
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC PD-L1: TPS 1-49% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=50% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225 mg) + Axitinib (5 mg)
n=3 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC and who received any line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225mg) + Axitinib (5 mg) + SEA-TGT(1mg/kg)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC and who received any line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC PD-L1: TPS 1-49% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=3 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC with who were treatment-naïve for advanced/metastatic disease with low PD-L1 levels TPS-49 % were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=50% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=2 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC with who were treatment-naïve for advanced/metastatic disease with high PD-L1 (TPS \>=50%) were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA+ TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic shock
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureterolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac tamponade
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Ejection fraction decreased
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (300mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=4 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 300 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSA: Sasanlimab (300mg) + Encorafenib (450mg) + Binimetinib (45mg)
n=9 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC with BRAFV600 mutations were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 of each cycle along with QD oral dose of 450 mg encorafenib and BID oral dose of 45 mg binimetinib during each 28-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225 mg) + Axitinib (5 mg)
n=3 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC and who received any line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 1b of SSB: Sasanlimab (225mg) + Axitinib (5 mg) + SEA-TGT(1mg/kg)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC and who received any line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC PD-L1: TPS 1-49% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=3 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC with who were treatment-naïve for advanced/metastatic disease with low PD-L1 levels TPS-49 % were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 1L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=50% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=2 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC with who were treatment-naïve for advanced/metastatic disease with high PD-L1 (TPS \>=50%) were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and Q3W IV infusion of 1 mg/kg SEA+ TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
Phase 2 of SSB: 2/3L NSCLC / PD-L1: TPS >=1% (Sasanlimab (225mg)+Axitinib (5mg)+SEA-TGT (1mg/kg)
n=7 participants at risk
Participants with NSCLC who received 1 or 2 lines of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC and whose disease has progressed on prior PD-1/ PD-L1 therapy and who have PD-L1 TPS \>= 1% were administered a single dose of sasanlimab 225 mg Q3W subcutaneously along with BID oral dose of 5 mg axitinib on Day 1 of each cycle and 1 mg/kg IV infusion Q3W SEA-TGT on Day 1 of each cycle during each 21-day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular discomfort
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypothyroidism
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Macular oedema
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal fovea disorder
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
50.0%
2/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
28.6%
2/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
3/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
42.9%
3/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
50.0%
2/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
42.9%
3/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
44.4%
4/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
3/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
42.9%
3/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
44.4%
4/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acne pustular
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rash pustular
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
44.4%
4/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
28.6%
2/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
100.0%
3/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
28.6%
2/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
44.4%
4/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase increased
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
28.6%
2/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperphosphataemia
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
44.4%
4/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
55.6%
5/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Restless legs syndrome
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureterolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
28.6%
2/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis acneiform
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
28.6%
2/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperkeratosis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Purpura
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
4/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin exfoliation
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin tightness
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
3/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hyperthyroidism
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Uveitis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous floaters
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anorectal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Odynophagia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Visceral venous thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Candida infection
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
100.0%
2/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood albumin decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bicarbonate decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood corticotrophin increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood thyroid stimulating hormone decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram T wave inversion
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
International normalised ratio increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary incontinence
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Embolism
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Glycosuria
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
3/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
28.6%
2/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal dryness
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
57.1%
4/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Granuloma annulare
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pain of skin
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash erythematous
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
50.0%
1/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
1/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear discomfort
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Narrow anterior chamber angle
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual impairment
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Nodule
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
SARS-CoV-2 test positive
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Connective tissue disorder
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic pain
|
25.0%
1/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nodular rash
|
0.00%
0/4 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tooth discolouration
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/2 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/7 • From the start of study treatment (Cycle1 Day1) up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum exposure = 38.66 months; maximum follow-up approximately 39.66 months)
Same event may appear as both non-serious adverse event (non-SAE) and SAE but are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both SAE and non-SAE. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from the study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER