Comparison of Quality of Vision After Bifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation

NCT04557579 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 97

Last updated 2020-09-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the visual performance of the extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) to bifocal and spherical monofocal IOL

Conditions

  • Intraocular Lens

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Clear corneal phacoemulsification and IOL implantation

Clear corneal phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were performed by 2 surgeons (Chao-Kai Chang and Hung-Yuan Lin) by using an identical technique to minimize differences in surgically induced aberrations between groups. The surgical process involved topical anesthesia, a 3-step clear corneal incision (2.75 mm) at 180° (temporal in both eyes), a 5.0-mm continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification using the stop-and-chop technique, IOL implantation with an injector, IOL centration, and a sutureless incision. The study IOL models include EDOF Symfony IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA), bifocal Restor +2.5D IOL (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA), and monofocal Sensar AR40e IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Chao-Kai Chang, Ph.D. · Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-12-24
Primary Completion
2020-01-22
Completion
2020-01-22

Countries

  • Taiwan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04557579 on ClinicalTrials.gov