Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study in the United States Using Electronic Medical Records (EMR) to Assess Effectiveness of Afatinib (Gilotrif) Following Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung (NCT NCT04552535)

NCT ID: NCT04552535

Last Updated: 2022-01-11

Results Overview

Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

200 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated and up to 7.5 months for chemotherapy treated patients

Results posted on

2022-01-11

Participant Flow

This retrospective, non-interventional, multi-site cohort study utilized existing data from the electronic medical records of patients with advanced or metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SqCC) of the lung treated with first-line pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy, followed by second-line afatinib or chemotherapy.

All patients (pts) aged ≥18 years, initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy. All pts had started second-line treatment with either afatinib or any CT at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Maximum follow-up for any pts was approx 15 months. Pts were excluded if they had received pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based CT as part of an interventional clinical trial.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Overall Study
STARTED
99
101
Overall Study
COMPLETED
99
101
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

A Study in the United States Using Electronic Medical Records (EMR) to Assess Effectiveness of Afatinib (Gilotrif) Following Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=99 Participants
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
n=101 Participants
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
67 Years
n=39 Participants
66 Years
n=41 Participants
67 Years
n=35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants
n=39 Participants
34 Participants
n=41 Participants
77 Participants
n=35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants
n=39 Participants
67 Participants
n=41 Participants
123 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants
n=39 Participants
1 Participants
n=41 Participants
7 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
30 Participants
n=39 Participants
23 Participants
n=41 Participants
53 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
59 Participants
n=39 Participants
73 Participants
n=41 Participants
132 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
n=39 Participants
4 Participants
n=41 Participants
8 Participants
n=35 Participants
Tumor histology
Squamous cell only
64 Participants
n=39 Participants
98 Participants
n=41 Participants
162 Participants
n=35 Participants
Tumor histology
Mixed histology
35 Participants
n=39 Participants
3 Participants
n=41 Participants
38 Participants
n=35 Participants
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status
EGFR mutation positive
39 Participants
n=39 Participants
5 Participants
n=41 Participants
44 Participants
n=35 Participants
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status
EGFR mutation negative
28 Participants
n=39 Participants
33 Participants
n=41 Participants
61 Participants
n=35 Participants
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status
Not tested / unknown
32 Participants
n=39 Participants
63 Participants
n=41 Participants
95 Participants
n=35 Participants
Smoking history
Never smoked
12 Participants
n=39 Participants
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
12 Participants
n=35 Participants
Smoking history
Current smoker
16 Participants
n=39 Participants
19 Participants
n=41 Participants
35 Participants
n=35 Participants
Smoking history
Former smoker
71 Participants
n=39 Participants
82 Participants
n=41 Participants
153 Participants
n=35 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status at initiation of second line (2L) treatment
ECOG 0/1
45 Participants
n=39 Participants
50 Participants
n=41 Participants
95 Participants
n=35 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status at initiation of second line (2L) treatment
ECOG ≥ 2
54 Participants
n=39 Participants
51 Participants
n=41 Participants
105 Participants
n=35 Participants
Tumor stage at initial diagnosis
Tumor stage I to IIIA
13 Participants
n=39 Participants
8 Participants
n=41 Participants
21 Participants
n=35 Participants
Tumor stage at initial diagnosis
Tumor stage IIIB
7 Participants
n=39 Participants
3 Participants
n=41 Participants
10 Participants
n=35 Participants
Tumor stage at initial diagnosis
Tumor stage IV
79 Participants
n=39 Participants
90 Participants
n=41 Participants
169 Participants
n=35 Participants
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Liver
65 Participants
n=39 Participants
69 Participants
n=41 Participants
134 Participants
n=35 Participants
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Contralateral lung nodule
51 Participants
n=39 Participants
43 Participants
n=41 Participants
94 Participants
n=35 Participants
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Blood and bone marrow
41 Participants
n=39 Participants
47 Participants
n=41 Participants
88 Participants
n=35 Participants
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Adrenal gland
26 Participants
n=39 Participants
48 Participants
n=41 Participants
74 Participants
n=35 Participants
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Pleura (nodules, effusion)
24 Participants
n=39 Participants
21 Participants
n=41 Participants
45 Participants
n=35 Participants
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Intra-abdominal lymph nodes
19 Participants
n=39 Participants
14 Participants
n=41 Participants
33 Participants
n=35 Participants
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Brain
14 Participants
n=39 Participants
10 Participants
n=41 Participants
24 Participants
n=35 Participants
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Any comorbidity
98 Participants
n=39 Participants
88 Participants
n=41 Participants
186 Participants
n=35 Participants
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Hypertension
62 Participants
n=39 Participants
56 Participants
n=41 Participants
118 Participants
n=35 Participants
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Chronic pulmonary disease
35 Participants
n=39 Participants
49 Participants
n=41 Participants
84 Participants
n=35 Participants
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Cardiovascular disease
23 Participants
n=39 Participants
33 Participants
n=41 Participants
56 Participants
n=35 Participants
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Depression
27 Participants
n=39 Participants
14 Participants
n=41 Participants
41 Participants
n=35 Participants
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Diabetes without chronic complications
21 Participants
n=39 Participants
16 Participants
n=41 Participants
37 Participants
n=35 Participants
Radiation therapy
First line or prior
14 Participants
n=39 Participants
10 Participants
n=41 Participants
24 Participants
n=35 Participants
Radiation therapy
Second line
12 Participants
n=39 Participants
9 Participants
n=41 Participants
21 Participants
n=35 Participants
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level
<1%
26 Participants
n=39 Participants
30 Participants
n=41 Participants
56 Participants
n=35 Participants
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level
1 to 49%
55 Participants
n=39 Participants
54 Participants
n=41 Participants
109 Participants
n=35 Participants
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level
>50%
15 Participants
n=39 Participants
6 Participants
n=41 Participants
21 Participants
n=35 Participants
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level
Not tested
3 Participants
n=39 Participants
11 Participants
n=41 Participants
14 Participants
n=35 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated and up to 7.5 months for chemotherapy treated patients

Population: All patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line treatment with either afatinib or any CT at least 3 months prior to date of data collection.

Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=99 Participants
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
n=101 Participants
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Time on Treatment With Afatinib or Chemotherapy During Second Line (2L) Treatment
7.3 months
Interval 5.2 to 8.1
4.2 months
Interval 3.9 to 4.9

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patients

Population: All patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Only patients treated with afatinib and with squamous cell - or mixed histology were included in the analysis.

Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment. Patients treated with afatinib were analysed for their histology status and categorized into a squamous cell - or mixed histology treatment group.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=64 Participants
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
n=35 Participants
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Histology Status
5.8 months
Interval 4.4 to 8.0
8.1 months
Interval 5.5 to 9.9

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patients

Population: All patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Only afatinib treated patients with an EGFR mutation positive or negative status were included in the analysis.

Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=39 Participants
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
n=28 Participants
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Status
7.4 months
Interval 5.6 to 8.6
5.9 months
Interval 4.4 to
not estimable due to unsufficient events

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months

Population: All patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line treatment with either afatinib or any CT at least 3 months prior to date of data collection.

Chart abstractors (i.e. the patients treating physician) were asked to abstract information regarding severe (grade 3 or higher) irAEs of specific interest (including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, higher indeterminate pulmonary events, death, or discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity) during first line (1L) treatment and second line (2L) for both patients treated with afatinib in 2L and those treated with chemotherapy in 2L. Providers/abstractors were asked only if these specific immune related events occurred.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=99 Participants
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
n=101 Participants
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Number of Patients With Severe Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) of Specific Interest During Second-line Treatment
6 Participants
0 Participants

Adverse Events

Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 37 other events
Deaths: 2 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=99 participants at risk
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
26.3%
26/99 • From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.
Adverse events (AEs) were only collected and reported for 2L afatinib treatment group according to protocol requirements. All 2L afatinib treatment group patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line (2L) treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Serious AEs were not collected and reported for this study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin rash
6.1%
6/99 • From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.
Adverse events (AEs) were only collected and reported for 2L afatinib treatment group according to protocol requirements. All 2L afatinib treatment group patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line (2L) treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Serious AEs were not collected and reported for this study.
General disorders
Fatigue
5.1%
5/99 • From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.
Adverse events (AEs) were only collected and reported for 2L afatinib treatment group according to protocol requirements. All 2L afatinib treatment group patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line (2L) treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Serious AEs were not collected and reported for this study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
5.1%
5/99 • From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.
Adverse events (AEs) were only collected and reported for 2L afatinib treatment group according to protocol requirements. All 2L afatinib treatment group patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line (2L) treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Serious AEs were not collected and reported for this study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
5.1%
5/99 • From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.
Adverse events (AEs) were only collected and reported for 2L afatinib treatment group according to protocol requirements. All 2L afatinib treatment group patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line (2L) treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Serious AEs were not collected and reported for this study.

Additional Information

Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Centre

Boehringer Ingelheim

Phone: 1-800-243-0127

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) acknowledges that investigators have the right to publish the study results. Investigators shall provide BI with a copy of any publication or presentation for review prior to any submission. Such review will be done with regard to proprietary information, information related to patentable inventions, medical, scientific, and statistical accuracy within 60 days. BI may request a delay of the publication in order to protect BI's intellectual property rights.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER