Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study in the United States Using Electronic Medical Records (EMR) to Assess Effectiveness of Afatinib (Gilotrif) Following Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung (NCT NCT04552535)
NCT ID: NCT04552535
Last Updated: 2022-01-11
Results Overview
Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.
COMPLETED
200 participants
From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated and up to 7.5 months for chemotherapy treated patients
2022-01-11
Participant Flow
This retrospective, non-interventional, multi-site cohort study utilized existing data from the electronic medical records of patients with advanced or metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SqCC) of the lung treated with first-line pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy, followed by second-line afatinib or chemotherapy.
All patients (pts) aged ≥18 years, initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy. All pts had started second-line treatment with either afatinib or any CT at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Maximum follow-up for any pts was approx 15 months. Pts were excluded if they had received pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based CT as part of an interventional clinical trial.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
99
|
101
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
99
|
101
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study in the United States Using Electronic Medical Records (EMR) to Assess Effectiveness of Afatinib (Gilotrif) Following Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=99 Participants
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
n=101 Participants
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67 Years
n=39 Participants
|
66 Years
n=41 Participants
|
67 Years
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
43 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
56 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
123 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
6 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
30 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
59 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
132 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
4 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Tumor histology
Squamous cell only
|
64 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
162 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Tumor histology
Mixed histology
|
35 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status
EGFR mutation positive
|
39 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status
EGFR mutation negative
|
28 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status
Not tested / unknown
|
32 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Smoking history
Never smoked
|
12 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Smoking history
Current smoker
|
16 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Smoking history
Former smoker
|
71 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
153 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status at initiation of second line (2L) treatment
ECOG 0/1
|
45 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status at initiation of second line (2L) treatment
ECOG ≥ 2
|
54 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Tumor stage at initial diagnosis
Tumor stage I to IIIA
|
13 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Tumor stage at initial diagnosis
Tumor stage IIIB
|
7 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Tumor stage at initial diagnosis
Tumor stage IV
|
79 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
169 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Liver
|
65 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Contralateral lung nodule
|
51 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Blood and bone marrow
|
41 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Adrenal gland
|
26 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Pleura (nodules, effusion)
|
24 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Intra-abdominal lymph nodes
|
19 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sites of metastatic disease at initiation of second line treatment
Brain
|
14 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Any comorbidity
|
98 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
186 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Hypertension
|
62 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
118 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Chronic pulmonary disease
|
35 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Cardiovascular disease
|
23 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Depression
|
27 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Most common comorbidities at initiation of second line treatment
Diabetes without chronic complications
|
21 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Radiation therapy
First line or prior
|
14 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Radiation therapy
Second line
|
12 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level
<1%
|
26 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level
1 to 49%
|
55 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
109 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level
>50%
|
15 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level
Not tested
|
3 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated and up to 7.5 months for chemotherapy treated patientsPopulation: All patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line treatment with either afatinib or any CT at least 3 months prior to date of data collection.
Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=99 Participants
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
n=101 Participants
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time on Treatment With Afatinib or Chemotherapy During Second Line (2L) Treatment
|
7.3 months
Interval 5.2 to 8.1
|
4.2 months
Interval 3.9 to 4.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patientsPopulation: All patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Only patients treated with afatinib and with squamous cell - or mixed histology were included in the analysis.
Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment. Patients treated with afatinib were analysed for their histology status and categorized into a squamous cell - or mixed histology treatment group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=64 Participants
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
n=35 Participants
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Histology Status
|
5.8 months
Interval 4.4 to 8.0
|
8.1 months
Interval 5.5 to 9.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patientsPopulation: All patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Only afatinib treated patients with an EGFR mutation positive or negative status were included in the analysis.
Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=39 Participants
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
n=28 Participants
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Status
|
7.4 months
Interval 5.6 to 8.6
|
5.9 months
Interval 4.4 to
not estimable due to unsufficient events
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 monthsPopulation: All patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line treatment with either afatinib or any CT at least 3 months prior to date of data collection.
Chart abstractors (i.e. the patients treating physician) were asked to abstract information regarding severe (grade 3 or higher) irAEs of specific interest (including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, higher indeterminate pulmonary events, death, or discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity) during first line (1L) treatment and second line (2L) for both patients treated with afatinib in 2L and those treated with chemotherapy in 2L. Providers/abstractors were asked only if these specific immune related events occurred.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=99 Participants
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
Second-line Chemotherapy Treatment Group
n=101 Participants
Patients in the second-line chemotherapy treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with any chemotherapy at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Severe Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) of Specific Interest During Second-line Treatment
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Second-line Afatinib Treatment Group
n=99 participants at risk
Patients in the second-line afatinib treatment group initiated first-line pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued first-line therapy. All patients had started second-line treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
26.3%
26/99 • From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.
Adverse events (AEs) were only collected and reported for 2L afatinib treatment group according to protocol requirements. All 2L afatinib treatment group patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line (2L) treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Serious AEs were not collected and reported for this study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin rash
|
6.1%
6/99 • From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.
Adverse events (AEs) were only collected and reported for 2L afatinib treatment group according to protocol requirements. All 2L afatinib treatment group patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line (2L) treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Serious AEs were not collected and reported for this study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
5.1%
5/99 • From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.
Adverse events (AEs) were only collected and reported for 2L afatinib treatment group according to protocol requirements. All 2L afatinib treatment group patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line (2L) treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Serious AEs were not collected and reported for this study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.1%
5/99 • From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.
Adverse events (AEs) were only collected and reported for 2L afatinib treatment group according to protocol requirements. All 2L afatinib treatment group patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line (2L) treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Serious AEs were not collected and reported for this study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
5.1%
5/99 • From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months.
Adverse events (AEs) were only collected and reported for 2L afatinib treatment group according to protocol requirements. All 2L afatinib treatment group patients (pts) who initiated first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and platinum-based combination chemotherapy (CT) after 1st June 2018, and subsequently discontinued 1L therapy and had started second-line (2L) treatment with afatinib at least 3 months prior to date of data collection. Serious AEs were not collected and reported for this study.
|
Additional Information
Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Centre
Boehringer Ingelheim
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) acknowledges that investigators have the right to publish the study results. Investigators shall provide BI with a copy of any publication or presentation for review prior to any submission. Such review will be done with regard to proprietary information, information related to patentable inventions, medical, scientific, and statistical accuracy within 60 days. BI may request a delay of the publication in order to protect BI's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER