MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Functional Outcome Between BQT and SBHT ACL Reconstruction

NCT04536246 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2020-09-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

ACL rupture has a high morbidity in productive-age population. The increasing incidence and proper management has become a point of interest in the musculoskeletal sport injury. Choosing the best graft has become the main focus in searching for a better outcome regarding ACL reconstruction in these patient population. Currently, single bundle hamstring tendon (SBHT) autograft was preferred in Asian population compared to bone quadriceps tendon (BQT) autograft. However, there are some problems such as smaller size, as well as diameter, of SBHT. This study is focused on evaluation of the clinical outcome between BQT and SBHT in arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction patients.

Conditions

  • Sports Injury
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Bone Quadriceps Tendon (BQT) arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction

New intervention method deployed in Indonesia to gain better clinical outcome for ACL--deficient patients requiring surgical treatment

PROCEDURE

Single-Bundle Hamstring Tendon (SBHT) arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction

Comparator for New Reconstruction Technique

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Indonesia University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
15 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-02-01
Primary Completion
2017-02-28
Completion
2017-11-17

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04536246 on ClinicalTrials.gov