Trial Outcomes & Findings for Orthodontic Varnish Microbiology Study (NCT NCT04528134)

NCT ID: NCT04528134

Last Updated: 2026-07-09

Results Overview

Assessed change in severity of white spots on the teeth as measured by the DiagnoDent, which uses quantitative light-induced fluorescence to assess the depth/severity of enamel demineralization. The DiagnoDent gives a score from 0-100, with 100 indicating the most demineralization (worse outcome) and 0 indicating the least demineralization (best outcome).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

38 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 months

Results posted on

2026-07-09

Participant Flow

Three subjects were enrolled in the study but did not move forward with participation in the study timepoints.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Extended Contact RMGI Varnish/5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish
This group will receive extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Placebo Varnish/Extended Contact RMGI Varnish
This group will receive placebo varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish/Placebo Varnish
This group received traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and placebo varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Overall Study
STARTED
13
12
10
Overall Study
COMPLETED
13
12
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Extended Contact RMGI Varnish/5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish
n=13 Participants
This group will receive extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Placebo Varnish/Extended Contact RMGI Varnish
n=12 Participants
This group will receive placebo varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish/Placebo Varnish
n=10 Participants
This group received traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and placebo varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Total
n=35 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
9 Participants
n=13 Participants
10 Participants
n=12 Participants
7 Participants
n=10 Participants
26 Participants
n=35 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
n=13 Participants
2 Participants
n=12 Participants
3 Participants
n=10 Participants
9 Participants
n=35 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
0 Participants
n=12 Participants
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
Age, Customized
12-15 years old
4 Participants
n=13 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
4 Participants
n=12 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
4 Participants
n=10 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
12 Participants
n=35 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
Age, Customized
16-19 years old
6 Participants
n=13 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
6 Participants
n=12 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
5 Participants
n=10 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
17 Participants
n=35 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
Age, Customized
20-27 years old
3 Participants
n=13 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
2 Participants
n=12 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
1 Participants
n=10 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
6 Participants
n=35 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples produced sufficient analyzeable data.
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
n=13 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples were able to be analyzed due to there being outliers.
7 Participants
n=12 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples were able to be analyzed due to there being outliers.
6 Participants
n=10 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples were able to be analyzed due to there being outliers.
20 Participants
n=35 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples were able to be analyzed due to there being outliers.
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants
n=13 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples were able to be analyzed due to there being outliers.
5 Participants
n=12 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples were able to be analyzed due to there being outliers.
4 Participants
n=10 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples were able to be analyzed due to there being outliers.
15 Participants
n=35 Participants • Not all participants completed the study and not all samples were able to be analyzed due to there being outliers.
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: One subject in each of Group 1 and 4 did not have a T4 measurement. Although this was a split-mouth study with interventions assigned to different sites within the same participant, outcomes were analyzed using a combined analysis population because potential crossover effects between treatment sites could influence outcomes across multiple areas of the mouth.

Assessed change in severity of white spots on the teeth as measured by the DiagnoDent, which uses quantitative light-induced fluorescence to assess the depth/severity of enamel demineralization. The DiagnoDent gives a score from 0-100, with 100 indicating the most demineralization (worse outcome) and 0 indicating the least demineralization (best outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Extended Contact RMGI Varnish/5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish
n=12 Participants
This group will receive extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Placebo Varnish/Extended Contact RMGI Varnish
n=12 Participants
This group will receive placebo varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish/Placebo Varnish
n=9 Participants
This group will receive traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and placebo varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
White Spot Lesion Severity
5.6 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 6.9
2.9 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
2.0 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: Not all participants completed the study and not all samples were used in the analysis due to outliers. Although this was a split-mouth study with interventions assigned to different sites within the same participant, outcomes were analyzed using a combined analysis population because potential crossover effects between treatment sites could influence outcomes across multiple areas of the mouth.

Assessed change in plaque levels, as measured by the Turesky-modified Quigley Hein Plaque Index. This index is measured on a scale of 0 to 5, with 5 representing the most plaque present (worst outcome) and 0 representing the least plaque present (best outcome). Below are the definitions of the scoring: 0: no plaque on the tooth 1. flecks of plaque along the gum margin 2. a thin continuous band of plaque (up to 1 mm) at the cervical margin of the tooth 3. a band of plaque wider than 1 mm covering less than one third of the crown of the tooth 4. plaque covering at least one-third but less than two thirds of the crown of the tooth 5. plaque covering two-thirds or more of the crown of the tooth

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Extended Contact RMGI Varnish/5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish
n=13 Participants
This group will receive extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Placebo Varnish/Extended Contact RMGI Varnish
n=12 Participants
This group will receive placebo varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish/Placebo Varnish
n=10 Participants
This group will receive traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and placebo varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Dental Plaque Levels
2.1 Index
Standard Deviation 1.0
2.2 Index
Standard Deviation 1.1
2.1 Index
Standard Deviation 1.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: The discrepancy is due to either (a) not having a T4 sample, or (b) contamination of the plates, resulting in an inaccurate CFU reading. Although this was a split-mouth study with interventions assigned to different sites within the same participant, outcomes were analyzed using a combined analysis population because potential crossover effects between treatment sites could influence outcomes across multiple areas of the mouth.

Colony forming units were measured on BHI (Brain Heart Infusion) plated samples from the different subject groups. BHI plating allows for culturing microorganisms in a nutrient-rich environment that serves as a versatile growth medium. A higher score indicates a higher presence of microorganisms (worse outcome), and a lower score indicates a lower presence of microorganisms (better outcome). There is no maximum score for CFUs, and a score of 0 would indicate a sterile sample where no microorganisms were detected.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Extended Contact RMGI Varnish/5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish
n=11 Participants
This group will receive extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Placebo Varnish/Extended Contact RMGI Varnish
n=11 Participants
This group will receive placebo varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish/Placebo Varnish
n=7 Participants
This group will receive traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and placebo varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Microbial Load
22433697 Colony Forming Units
Standard Deviation 18353279
55848484 Colony Forming Units
Standard Deviation 84265021
51348333 Colony Forming Units
Standard Deviation 60058969

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: The discrepancy is due to either (a) not having an adequate sample for plating or (b) contamination of the plate, causing an inaccurate CFU score. Although this was a split-mouth study with interventions assigned to different sites within the same participant, outcomes were analyzed using a combined analysis population because potential crossover effects between treatment sites could influence outcomes across multiple areas of the mouth.

Change in amounts of Streptococcus mutans, as measured by counting Colony-Forming Units (CFUs) after plating samples on a medium that is specifically targeted to cultivate Streptococcus microorganisms. A higher score indicates a higher presence of Streptococcus mutans (worse outcome), and a lower score indicates a lower presence of Streptococcus mutans (better outcome). There is no maximum score for CFUs, and a score of 0 would indicate a sample where no Streptococcus microorganisms were detected.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Extended Contact RMGI Varnish/5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish
n=11 Participants
This group will receive extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Placebo Varnish/Extended Contact RMGI Varnish
n=12 Participants
This group will receive placebo varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish/Placebo Varnish
n=8 Participants
This group will receive traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and placebo varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Plaque and Saliva Microbial Colonization of S. Mutans
254945 Colony Forming Units
Standard Deviation 283931
103620 Colony Forming Units
Standard Deviation 127921
333481 Colony Forming Units
Standard Deviation 413402

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: Did not have T4 photographs for one subject in Group 3. Although this was a split-mouth study with interventions assigned to different sites within the same participant, outcomes were analyzed using a combined analysis population because potential crossover effects between treatment sites could influence outcomes across multiple areas of the mouth.

Assessed change in the visual appearance of white spots on the teeth, as measured by the ICDAS (International Caries Detection and Assessment System) from clinical photographs. The lowest score (0) indicates the best outcome, and the highest score (6) indicates the worst outcome. 0: Sound tooth surface, no evidence of decay 1. First visual change in enamel 2. Distinct visual change in enamel 3. Localized enamel breakdown, small cavitation or breakdown of the enamel without visible dentin showing 4. Underlying dark shadow from dentin, possible small breaks in enamel 5. Distinct cavity exposing underlying dentin involving less than half the tooth 6. Extensive distinct cavity exposing the dentin involving at least half of the tooth surface and potentially reaching the pulp

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Extended Contact RMGI Varnish/5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish
n=13 Participants
This group will receive extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
Placebo Varnish/Extended Contact RMGI Varnish
n=12 Participants
This group will receive placebo varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and extended contact (XT) varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish/Placebo Varnish
n=9 Participants
This group will receive traditional 5% sodium fluoride varnish on their upper left and lower right teeth, and placebo varnish on their upper right and lower left teeth.
White Spot Lesion Clinical Appearance
0.743237532 Index
Standard Deviation 0.609549334
0.794871795 Index
Standard Deviation 0.525868645
0.488977072 Index
Standard Deviation 0.267103052

Adverse Events

Extended Contact RMGI Varnish/5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo Varnish/Extended Contact RMGI Varnish

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish/Placebo Varnish

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Renate Lux, PhD

University of California, Los Angeles School of Dentistry

Phone: (310) 206-5660

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place