Trial Outcomes & Findings for Foster Care Mental Health Family Navigator (NCT NCT04506437)
NCT ID: NCT04506437
Last Updated: 2026-06-30
Results Overview
Number of days until treatment referral is made
COMPLETED
NA
76 participants
12 months post enrollment
2026-06-30
Participant Flow
A total of 76 participants were recruited as youth-caregiver dyads. There were a total of 38 participants (or 19 youth-caregiver dyads) in each condition.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Family-based Mental Health Navigation
Family-based navigator intervention combined with mHealth practices to improve mental health treatment initiation and engagement
Family-based mental health navigation: Family-based navigator intervention combined with mHealth practices to improve mental health treatment initiation and engagement
|
Standard of Care (Clinic Case Management)
Standard of care engagement practices: Standard of care engagement practices and services-as-usual
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
38
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
Youth Participants
|
19
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
Caregiver Participants
|
19
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
38
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Age demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Family-based Mental Health Navigation
n=38 Participants
Family-based navigator intervention combined with mHealth practices to improve mental health treatment initiation and engagement
Family-based mental health navigation: Family-based navigator intervention combined with mHealth practices to improve mental health treatment initiation and engagement
|
Standard of Care (Clinic Case Management)
n=38 Participants
Standard of care case management practices and services-as-usual
|
Total
n=76 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
Youth Age Demographics
|
14.47 years
n=19 Participants • Age demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
14.22 years
n=19 Participants • Age demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
14.39 years
n=38 Participants • Age demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Age, Continuous
Caregiver Age Demographics
|
43.88 years
n=19 Participants • Age demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
45.11 years
n=19 Participants • Age demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
44.53 years
n=38 Participants • Age demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Youth Sex Demographics · Female
|
10 Participants
n=18 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
10 Participants
n=19 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
20 Participants
n=37 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Youth Sex Demographics · Male
|
8 Participants
n=18 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
9 Participants
n=19 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
17 Participants
n=37 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Youth Race Demographics · White
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Caregiver Sex Demographics · Female
|
16 Participants
n=16 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
16 Participants
n=18 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
32 Participants
n=34 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Caregiver Sex Demographics · Male
|
0 Participants
n=16 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
2 Participants
n=18 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
2 Participants
n=34 Participants • Sex demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions. Note: Sex demographic data were missing for 1 youth in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), 3 caregivers in the intervention condition (did not complete baseline), and 1 caregiver in the control condition (did not complete baseline). Note that this was an intent to treat trial design.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Youth Race Demographics · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Youth Race Demographics · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
2 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
2 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Youth Race Demographics · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Youth Race Demographics · Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
4 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
9 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Youth Race Demographics · More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
1 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Youth Race Demographics · Unknown or Not Reported
|
13 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
13 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
26 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver Race Demographics · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver Race Demographics · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
1 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
1 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver Race Demographics · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver Race Demographics · Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
4 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
11 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver Race Demographics · White
|
1 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
2 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
3 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver Race Demographics · More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
0 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver Race Demographics · Unknown or Not Reported
|
11 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
12 Participants
n=19 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
23 Participants
n=38 Participants • Race demographic data for youth and caregivers were analyzed separately across the intervention and control conditions.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months post enrollmentPopulation: Time to treatment referral data were available for only 26 youth participants (13 in the family-based mental health navigation intervention and 13 in the standard of care condition) due to changes in the electronic medical record system.
Number of days until treatment referral is made
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care (Clinic Case Management)
n=13 Participants
Standard of care case management practices and services-as-usual
|
Family-based Mental Health Navigation
n=13 Participants
Family-based navigator intervention combined with mHealth practices to improve mental health treatment initiation and engagement
Family-based mental health navigation: Family-based navigator intervention combined with mHealth practices to improve mental health treatment initiation and engagement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Treatment Referral
|
13 days
Interval 0.0 to 71.0
|
56 days
Interval 12.0 to 169.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months post enrollmentPopulation: Time to treatment initiation data were only available for 4 youth participants in the family-based mental health navigation intervention and 1 youth participant in the standard of care condition.
Number of days until attendance at first treatment session
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care (Clinic Case Management)
n=1 Participants
Standard of care case management practices and services-as-usual
|
Family-based Mental Health Navigation
n=4 Participants
Family-based navigator intervention combined with mHealth practices to improve mental health treatment initiation and engagement
Family-based mental health navigation: Family-based navigator intervention combined with mHealth practices to improve mental health treatment initiation and engagement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Treatment Initiation
|
2 days
Interval 2.0 to 2.0
|
3 days
Interval 3.0 to 19.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months post enrollmentPopulation: Treatment engagement data were only available for 10 youth participants in the family-based mental health navigation intervention and 3 youth participants in the standard of care condition.
Engagement as measured by attendance in treatment for 6 or more weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care (Clinic Case Management)
n=3 Participants
Standard of care case management practices and services-as-usual
|
Family-based Mental Health Navigation
n=10 Participants
Family-based navigator intervention combined with mHealth practices to improve mental health treatment initiation and engagement
Family-based mental health navigation: Family-based navigator intervention combined with mHealth practices to improve mental health treatment initiation and engagement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Engagement: Number of Participants in Treatment for 6 or More Weeks
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Family-based Mental Health Navigation
Standard of Care (Clinic Case Management)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Jannet Lara Salas
University of San Francisco, California
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place