Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Effect on Disease Progression of BIIB105 in Participants With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Participants With the ALS Ataxin-2 (ATXN2) Genetic Mutation (NCT NCT04494256)
NCT ID: NCT04494256
Last Updated: 2025-10-09
Results Overview
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, places the participant at immediate risk of death, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a medically important event. A TEAE/TESAE was defined as any AE/SAE with an onset date that is on or after the first dose of study drug or any pre-existing condition that has worsened in severity after the first dose of study drug.
TERMINATED
PHASE1/PHASE2
99 participants
From first dose of the study drug in Part 1 up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260)
2025-10-09
Participant Flow
Participants diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and ALS associated with ataxin-2 (ATXN2) polyCAG expansion (polyQALS) took part in the study at investigational sites in the United States, Netherlands, Canada and Italy from 28 September 2020 to 13 August 2024.
A total of 99 participants were randomized in Part 1 (placebo-controlled) of study to receive BIIB105 or placebo, of which 80 participants completed Part 1. A total of 70 eligible participants who completed Part 1 were enrolled into Part 2 (open-label) of study to receive BIIB105. Part 2 of study was terminated early based on Sponsor's decision.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 Milligrams (mg)
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5mg, intrathecally (IT), administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants from cohorts A-C2, who received 5, 20 and 60 mg doses of BIIB105 and placebo in Part 1 and completed Week 25 (Day 175) visit in Part 1 received BIIB105 60 mg in Part 2.
|
Part 2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants from Cohorts D1 and D2 who received 120 mg dose of BIIB105 and placebo in Part 1 and completed Week 25 (Day 176) visit in Part 1 received BIIB105 120 mg in Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Double Blinded Period
STARTED
|
28
|
6
|
6
|
11
|
48
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1: Double Blinded Period
COMPLETED
|
26
|
6
|
5
|
9
|
34
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1: Double Blinded Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 2: Open Label Period
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
19
|
51
|
|
Part 2: Open Label Period
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 2: Open Label Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
19
|
51
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 Milligrams (mg)
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5mg, intrathecally (IT), administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants from cohorts A-C2, who received 5, 20 and 60 mg doses of BIIB105 and placebo in Part 1 and completed Week 25 (Day 175) visit in Part 1 received BIIB105 60 mg in Part 2.
|
Part 2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants from Cohorts D1 and D2 who received 120 mg dose of BIIB105 and placebo in Part 1 and completed Week 25 (Day 176) visit in Part 1 received BIIB105 120 mg in Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Double Blinded Period
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1: Double Blinded Period
Disease Progression - As Defined by the Protocol
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1: Double Blinded Period
Protocol Deviation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1: Double Blinded Period
SubjectWithdrawal-VisitBurden/SchedulingConflict
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1: Double Blinded Period
Withdrawal by Subject - Other
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 1: Double Blinded Period
Reason Not Specified
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part 2: Open Label Period
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
2
|
|
Part 2: Open Label Period
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Part 2: Open Label Period
Disease Progression - As Defined by the Protocol
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
6
|
|
Part 2: Open Label Period
Lack of Efficacy - Based on Subject Perception
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Part 2: Open Label Period
Study Terminated by Sponsor
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
35
|
|
Part 2: Open Label Period
SubjectWithdrawal-VisitBurden/SchedulingConflict
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
4
|
|
Part 2: Open Label Period
Withdrawal by Subject - Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Effect on Disease Progression of BIIB105 in Participants With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Participants With the ALS Ataxin-2 (ATXN2) Genetic Mutation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=28 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Total
n=99 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.15 • n=99 Participants
|
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.72 • n=107 Participants
|
49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.84 • n=206 Participants
|
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.77 • n=7 Participants
|
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.45 • n=31 Participants
|
57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.83 • n=30 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
23 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
00 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
22 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported due to confidentiality regulations
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug in Part 1 up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260)Population: Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, places the participant at immediate risk of death, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a medically important event. A TEAE/TESAE was defined as any AE/SAE with an onset date that is on or after the first dose of study drug or any pre-existing condition that has worsened in severity after the first dose of study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=28 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
TEAEs
|
28 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
|
Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
TESAEs
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of the study in Part 2 up to end of follow up period in Part 2 (up to Day 1184)Population: Part 2 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, places the participant at immediate risk of death, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a medically important event. A TEAE/TESAE was defined as any AE/SAE with an onset date that is on or after the first dose of study drug or any pre-existing condition that has worsened in severity after the first dose of study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=19 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=51 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 2: Number of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs
TEAEs
|
19 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part 2: Number of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs
TESAEs
|
7 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6 hours post-dose on days 1, 15, 29, 57, 85,113, 141, 169 and on days 2, 8, 92, and 176Population: The Part 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 postdose serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) BIIB105 measurement in Part 1. 'Number analyzed (n)' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure (OM) at the specified timepoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 1: Pre-dose
|
0.00 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
0.00 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
0.00 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
0.00 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 1: 1 HR post-dose
|
7.21 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 500.18
|
57.70 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 285.30
|
34.98 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 465.78
|
187.14 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 351.05
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 1: 2 HR post-dose
|
32.20 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 177.01
|
135.71 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 109.27
|
250.28 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 101.57
|
620.38 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 132.37
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 1: 4 HR post-dose
|
41.38 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 125.95
|
211.34 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.29
|
488.11 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 51.22
|
798.21 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 86.03
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 1: 6 HR post-dose
|
39.27 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 102.97
|
165.05 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 60.63
|
528.45 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 61.49
|
774.73 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 60.51
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 2
|
6.76 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65.90
|
29.07 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 76.82
|
118.70 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 103.89
|
260.03 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 67.59
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 8
|
0.46 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.74
|
0.47 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.02
|
1.38 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 74.15
|
2.97 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.60
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 15: 1 HR post-dose
|
3.85 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 172.70
|
22.24 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 226.26
|
56.01 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 489.04
|
257.73 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 290.21
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 29: 1 HR post-dose
|
5.80 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 117.90
|
16.45 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 557.48
|
114.69 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 226.87
|
248.00 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 152.63
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 29: 6 HR post-dose
|
33.28 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 127.43
|
151.47 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 87.99
|
555.65 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.83
|
942.06 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 69.00
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 57: Pre-dose
|
0.00 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
0.41 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.53
|
0.79 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.26
|
1.83 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 69.80
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 57: 1 HR post-dose
|
7.45 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 275.61
|
7.98 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 159.54
|
44.33 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 615.14
|
227.06 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 214.59
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 57: 2 HR post-dose
|
22.05 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 153.51
|
26.59 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 107.62
|
274.02 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 128.39
|
713.36 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 122.48
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 57: 4 HR post-dose
|
27.72 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 123.67
|
74.60 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 85.53
|
471.12 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 95.76
|
887.82 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 105.32
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 85: 2 HR post-dose
|
20.60 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 95.33
|
69.04 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 265.82
|
248.33 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 84.14
|
651.00 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 127.92
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 85: 4 HR post-dose
|
27.69 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 111.28
|
140.04 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 91.00
|
416.74 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.90
|
799.70 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 89.26
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 141: 4 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1044.80 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 101.09
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 141: 6 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
996.44 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 85.54
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 169: Pre-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2.95 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 153.02
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 169: 1 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
288.75 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 217.19
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 15: Pre-dose
|
0.00 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
0.50 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.12
|
0.78 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.94
|
1.90 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.15
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 15: 2 HR post-dose
|
16.89 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 111.49
|
94.51 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 140.45
|
246.73 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 142.61
|
972.44 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 110.25
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 15: 4 HR post-dose
|
30.07 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 74.48
|
139.75 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 137.49
|
363.86 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 77.37
|
996.20 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 83.48
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 15: 6 HR post-dose
|
27.28 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 106.96
|
139.00 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 98.33
|
411.61 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.33
|
897.25 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 78.56
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 29: Pre-dose
|
0.45 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.48
|
0.48 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.47
|
1.23 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 64.84
|
2.59 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.99
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 29: 2 HR post-dose
|
16.53 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 121.68
|
51.58 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 602.03
|
420.39 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 116.92
|
773.11 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 95.92
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 29: 4 HR post-dose
|
31.29 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 120.91
|
102.80 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 200.28
|
566.43 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 71.83
|
953.50 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.75
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 57: 6 HR post-dose
|
27.33 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 105.30
|
89.38 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 74.82
|
416.91 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 94.12
|
889.54 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 89.20
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 85: Pre-dose
|
0.50 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
0.40 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.26
|
0.74 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 64.453
|
1.91 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 113.18
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 85: 1 HR post-dose
|
7.02 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 111.81
|
18.91 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 240.40
|
77.63 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 142.75
|
231.31 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 236.91
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 85: 6 HR post-dose
|
29.83 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 119.17
|
140.74 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50.95
|
453.58 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 74.39
|
837.50 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 73.65
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 92
|
0.43 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.54
|
0.56 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.98
|
2.05 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 92.02
|
4.47 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 64.10
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 113: Pre-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1.95 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.79
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 113: 1 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
193.04 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 198.68
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 113: 2 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
632.28 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 91.07
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 113: 4 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
802.46 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 91.76
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 113: 6 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
858.58 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 86.76
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 141: Pre-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2.07 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.82
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 141: 1 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
457.25 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 162.57
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 141: 2 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
949.31 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 120.40
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 169: 2 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
702.24 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 107.10
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 169: 4 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
816.90 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 86.61
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 169: 6 HR post-dose
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
683.89 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 158.85
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Serum Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 176
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
6.97 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 132.41
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Days 1, 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, and on days 92, 130, 175, and 176Population: The Part 1 PK analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 postdose serum and/or CSF BIIB105 measurement in Part 1. 'Number analyzed (n)' signifies number of participants evaluable for this OM at the specified time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 85 : Pre-dose
|
2.37 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.35
|
3.18 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 72.73
|
6.50 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.23
|
14.06 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 77.42
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 92
|
5.01 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.62
|
6.28 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 74.45
|
25.51 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66.26
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 113
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
17.08 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 86.41
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 130
|
2.09 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.22
|
2.45 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57.06
|
5.42 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.72
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 141
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
17.91 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 84.83
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 169
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
18.88 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 74.23
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 175
|
1.16 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.77
|
1.16 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.06
|
2.68 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.05
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 176
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
17.35 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.04
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 1 : Pre-dose
|
0.00 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
0.00 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
0.00 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
0.00 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 15 : Pre-dose
|
1.93 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.54
|
2.71 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55.21
|
5.75 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62.33
|
14.54 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 82.48
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 29 : Pre-dose
|
3.53 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.52
|
4.32 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.42
|
11.53 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.38
|
17.53 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 95.18
|
—
|
|
Part 1: CSF Concentrations of BIIB105
Day 57 : Pre-dose
|
2.32 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.96
|
2.65 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.23
|
4.82 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.33
|
10.29 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 79.90
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: Part 1 PK analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 postdose serum and/or CSF BIIB105 measurement in Part 1. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with data available for OM analysis.
AUCinf is the area under the serum concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time. AUCinf was reported following dose 1 as planned.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=2 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf)
|
934.22 Hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.89
|
3546.89 Hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 53.50
|
11258.45 Hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.57
|
24466.44 Hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.24
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: Part 1 PK analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 postdose serum and/or CSF BIIB105 measurement in Part 1. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with data available for OM analysis.
AUClast was reported following dose 1 as planned.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast)
|
574.59 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 79.16
|
3239.40 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.73
|
11758.68 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.12
|
24289.70 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.50
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141 and 169Population: Part 1 PK analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 postdose serum and/or CSF BIIB105 measurement in Part 1. 'Number analyzed (n)' signifies number of participants evaluable for this OM at the specified timepoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Day 1
|
52.18 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 123.13
|
227.80 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 73.20
|
644.10 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55.31
|
1019.11 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 76.61
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Day 15
|
31.03 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 78.23
|
165.37 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 118.45
|
495.03 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 76.73
|
1312.42 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 93.96
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Day 29
|
34.11 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 119.62
|
164.15 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 101.46
|
616.02 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 61.54
|
1173.71 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 75.74
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Day 57
|
31.92 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 136.57
|
94.60 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 75.30
|
513.84 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 98.01
|
1052.70 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 99.57
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Day 85
|
31.43 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 117.43
|
168.38 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.96
|
476.91 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 75.87
|
1009.44 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 84.68
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Day 113
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
949.58 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 83.69
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Day 141
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1243.75 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 91.13
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Day 169
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
957.24 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 86.51
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141 and 169Population: Part 1 PK analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 postdose serum and/or CSF BIIB105 measurement in Part 1. 'Number analyzed (n)' signifies number of participants evaluable for this OM at the specified timepoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax)
Day 15
|
5.0 hour
Interval 4.0 to 6.0
|
5.0 hour
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
5.9 hour
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
4.1 hour
Interval 1.0 to 6.0
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax)
Day 29
|
5.8 hour
Interval 4.0 to 6.0
|
5.8 hour
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
4.2 hour
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
4.1 hour
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax)
Day 57
|
5.8 hour
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
5.0 hour
Interval 4.0 to 6.0
|
4.2 hour
Interval 1.0 to 6.0
|
4.5 hour
Interval 1.0 to 6.0
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax)
Day 85
|
5.1 hour
Interval 4.0 to 6.0
|
4.3 hour
Interval 4.0 to 6.0
|
5.8 hour
Interval 4.0 to 6.0
|
5.8 hour
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax)
Day 1
|
4.2 hour
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
4.2 hour
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
5.8 hour
Interval 2.0 to 23.0
|
4.3 hour
Interval 1.0 to 24.0
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax)
Day 113
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
5.3 hour
Interval 1.0 to 6.0
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax)
Day 141
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4.0 hour
Interval 1.0 to 6.0
|
—
|
|
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax)
Day 169
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4.1 hour
Interval 1.0 to 6.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: Part 1 PK analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 postdose serum and/or CSF BIIB105 measurement in Part 1. ''Overall number of participants (n)' signifies number of participants evaluable for this OM.
Elimination half-life (t1/2) was reported following dose 1 as planned.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=2 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=42 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) in Serum
|
14.0 hour
Interval 5.0 to 23.0
|
26.6 hour
Interval 17.0 to 62.0
|
41.7 hour
Interval 33.0 to 62.0
|
39.8 hour
Interval 22.0 to 82.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 29, 57, 85, 113, 130 (For cohorts A, B, C1 and C2)/141 (For cohorts D1 and D2), 169 (For cohorts A, B, C1 and C2)/175 (For cohorts D1 and D2) and 241Population: The Part 1 pharmacodynamic (PD) population included participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 available postdose evaluation of the respective PD endpoint in the study in Part 1. 'Number analyzed (n)' indicates the number of participants evaluable for the OM at the specified timepoint.
Plasma NfL ratio to baseline was reported in terms of geometric mean ratio.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=28 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=6 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
n=47 Participants
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 29
|
1.04 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.32
|
1.05 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.47
|
0.83 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.1
|
1.06 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11.23
|
1.15 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 72.72
|
|
Part 1: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 57
|
1.08 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.91
|
0.95 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.63
|
0.97 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.95
|
1.08 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.43
|
1.03 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.7
|
|
Part 1: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 85
|
0.99 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.27
|
0.99 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.7
|
0.98 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.4
|
1.11 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.85
|
0.99 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.62
|
|
Part 1: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 113
|
1.06 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.95
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1.01 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.77
|
|
Part 1: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 130 (A,B,C1,C2)/Day 141 (D1,D2)
|
1.09 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.46
|
1.10 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.58
|
0.92 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.79
|
0.99 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.8
|
1.03 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.35
|
|
Part 1: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 169 (A,B,C1,C2)/Day 175 (D1,D2)
|
1.10 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.67
|
1.02 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.58
|
1.10 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.55
|
1.08 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.73
|
1.06 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.92
|
|
Part 1: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 214
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1.07 ratio
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose on Days 1,15,29,57,85 and on Days 1,15,29,57,85,113,141,169.176,197,210,225,253,281,309,337,365,393,420,448,476,504,532,560,588,616,644,672,700,726,728Population: Integrated Part 1 \& 2=Part 1 PK population.Overall number of participants analyzed=number of participants evaluable for OM analysis.Number analyzed=number of participants evaluable at specified timepoint.Assessment was planned upto Day 1093 however,no assessments were conducted after Day 729 due to early termination.Treatment groups for integrated analysis of Parts 1 \& 2 were planned for Early-start BIIB105 120 mg \& Placebo/Delayed-start BIIB105,\& results are reported for these treatment groups.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 15
|
31.04 ng/mL
|
12.93 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 70.31
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 29: Pre-dose
|
17.53 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 95.18
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 29
|
—
|
18.62 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 93.41
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 57 : Pre-dose
|
10.29 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 79.90
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 57
|
—
|
9.72 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.08
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 85 : Pre-dose
|
14.06 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 77.42
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 85
|
—
|
14.54 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 63.76
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 113
|
17.08 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 86.41
|
20.70 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 56.82
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 141
|
17.91 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 84.83
|
24.50 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.13
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 169
|
18.88 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 74.23
|
19.32 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.08
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 176
|
17.35 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.04
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 197
|
24.88 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57.69
|
24.99 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 71.18
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 225
|
24.14 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 63.21
|
30.52 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.97
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 253
|
23.54 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62.86
|
21.68 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 70.34
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 309
|
27.14 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 63.54
|
30.47 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.01
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 337
|
31.34 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 71.84
|
22.11 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.80
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 365
|
30.16 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62.35
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 532
|
26.73 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.19
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 560
|
26.42 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.82
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 588
|
40.26 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.00
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 616
|
24.69 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 109.22
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 726
|
28.22 ng/mL
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 1 : Pre-dose
|
0.13 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 1
|
—
|
0.15 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.88
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 15 : Pre-dose
|
14.54 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 82.48
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 210
|
49.04 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 67.88
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 281
|
26.51 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 73.96
|
23.79 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.69
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 393
|
23.56 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.29
|
15.36 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.95
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 420
|
25.84 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.82
|
21.91 ng/mL
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 448
|
23.53 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.75
|
28.43 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation is not estimable due to less number of participants.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 476
|
30.87 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.29
|
25.95 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Geometric coefficient of variation is not estimable due to less number of participants.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 504
|
28.24 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.06
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 644
|
21.15 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.95
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 672
|
30.75 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48.18
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 700
|
23.85 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.63
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: CSF PK Concentration of BIIB105
Day 728
|
26.28 ng/mL
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 176Population: Assessments were planned upto Day 1009 for this OM;however no assessments were conducted after Day 176 due to early termination.Serum concentrations of BIIB105 were not estimable for Integrated Parts 1 \& 2.Data collected for serum PK concentrations for Parts 1 \& 2 are reported in OM #3 and #20(post-hoc)respectively.Treatment groups for integrated analysis of Parts 1 \& 2 were planned for Early-start BIIB105 120 mg \& Placebo/Delayed-start BIIB105,\& results are reported for these treatment groups.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Serum Concentration of BIIB105
|
NA ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Data were not estimable due to values being below the lower limit of quantification
|
NA ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Data were not estimable due to values being below the lower limit of quantification
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 365, 393, 421, 449, 477, 505, 533, 561, 589, 617, 645, 673, 701Population: Integrated Parts 1 and 2=Part 1 PD population. Number analyzed indicates the number of participants evaluable for the OM at the specified timepoint. The treatment groups for the integrated analysis of Part 1 and Part 2 were planned for Early-start BIIB105 120 mg and Placebo/Delayed-start BIIB105, and results are reported for these treatment groups.
Plasma NfL ratio to baseline was reported in terms of geometric mean ratio.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=47 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 85
|
0.99 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.62
|
1.00 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.00
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 113
|
1.01 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.77
|
1.06 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.95
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 505
|
0.77 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.18
|
0.88 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.94
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 533
|
0.78 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.58
|
1.15 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.24
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 29
|
1.15 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 72.72
|
1.03 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.35
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 57
|
1.03 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.7
|
1.11 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 141
|
1.03 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.35
|
1.10 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.84
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 169
|
1.06 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.92
|
1.06 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.33
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 197
|
1.08 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.28
|
1.08 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 225
|
1.12 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.42
|
1.12 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.12
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 253
|
1.15 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.4
|
1.06 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.71
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 281
|
1.14 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.57
|
1.18 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.26
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 309
|
1.07 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.81
|
1.09 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.46
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 337
|
1.05 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.67
|
1.18 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 365
|
0.99 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.42
|
1.20 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.59
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 393
|
0.95 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48.05
|
1.26 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.88
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 421
|
0.92 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.61
|
1.21 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58.82
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 449
|
0.82 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.9
|
1.06 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.94
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 477
|
0.85 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.15
|
0.92 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.52
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 561
|
0.65 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.63
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 589
|
0.77 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.28
|
0.90 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.38
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 617
|
0.80 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.48
|
0.70 ratio
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 645
|
0.76 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.68
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 673
|
0.66 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.22
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Plasma Concentration Ratio to Baseline
Day 701
|
0.54 ratio
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 281Population: Integrated data for Part 1 and Part 2 was analyzed based on the clinical function population defined for Part 1. The Part 1 clinical function population included participants from the FAS population who have at least 1 postdose measurement in Part 1. The treatment groups for the integrated analysis of Part 1 and Part 2 were planned for Early-start BIIB105 120 mg and Placebo/Delayed-start BIIB105, and results are reported for these treatment groups.
Vital capacity was measured by means of the slow vital capacity (SVC) test using a facemask with the participant sitting upright. SVC was determined by performing at least 3 trials. If the difference between the two highest values of the three trials was ≥10%, then up to 5 trials were performed. The highest percent predicted SVC value at each visit was used for the analysis. Here, baseline is defined as Part 1 day 1 value prior to the study drug. As specified in SAP, change from baseline at Week 40 (Day 281) in least square means and corresponding standard errors was summarized using the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. Negative change from baseline indicates decrease in lung function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)
|
-14.49 percent predicted
Standard Error 4.093
|
-14.41 percent predicted
Standard Error 7.133
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 281Population: Integrated data for Part 1 and Part 2 was analyzed based on the clinical function population defined for Part 1. The Part 1 clinical function population included participants from the FAS population who have at least 1 postdose measurement in Part 1. The treatment groups for the integrated analysis of Part 1 and Part 2 were planned for Early-start BIIB105 120 mg and Placebo/Delayed-start BIIB105, and results are reported for these treatment groups.
The ALSFRS-R is a questionnaire that measured degree of impairment in 4 functional domains: respiratory function, bulbar function, gross motor skills, and fine motor skills. Each domain consists of 3 items, each scored from 0 to 4, with higher scores representing better function. Each domain score can have maximum score of 12 calculated as the sum of scores of 3 items for that domain and the total possible score for ALSFRS-R is 48. The total score is the sum of the 4 functional domain scores or all individual item scores if no missing item scores are present. Here, baseline is defined as Part 1 day 1 value prior to the study drug Negative change from baseline indicates disease progression. As specified in SAP change from baseline at Week 40 (Day 281) in least square means and corresponding standard errors was summarized using the ANCOVA model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) Score
|
-8.46 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.105
|
-8.26 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.819
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 281Population: Integrated data for Part 1 and Part 2 was analyzed based on the clinical function population defined for Part 1. The Part 1 clinical function population included participants from the FAS population who have at least 1 postdose measurement in Part 1. The treatment groups for the integrated analysis of Part 1 and Part 2 were planned for Early-start BIIB105 120 mg and Placebo/Delayed-start BIIB105, and results are reported for these treatment groups.
Quantitative muscle strength was evaluated using HHD, which tested the isometric strength of multiple muscles using standard participant positioning. Approximately 8 muscle groups were examined (per each side) in both upper and lower extremities. The muscle strength values were normalized to Z scores as (post-baseline measurements -mean)/SD and averaged to provide HHD overall megascore. The overall megascore was created by averaging Z scores, if no more than 14 (≤ 14) measures are missing. A Z-score (also called a standard score) is a way to describe how far and in what direction a data point is from the mean of the dataset (in this case, positive values indicate strength and negative values indicate weakness). A Z-score of 0 indicates the population mean, and a positive score indicates muscle strength. A negative change from baseline indicated decreased muscle strength.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Muscle Strength as Measured by Handheld Dynamometry (HHD) Megascore
|
-0.407 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.3918
|
-0.439 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.4406
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 1184Population: Integrated data for Part 1 and Part 2 was analyzed based on the FAS population defined for Part 1. Part 1 FAS population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1 and 2. The treatment groups for the integrated analysis of Part 1 and Part 2 were planned for Early-start BIIB105 120 mg and Placebo/Delayed-start BIIB105, and results are reported for these treatment groups.
Time to death or permanent ventilation is defined as the time from first dose to death or permanent ventilation ( ≥ 22 hours of mechanical ventilation \[invasive or noninvasive\] per day for ≥ 21 consecutive days), whichever comes first. Participants who did not meet the endpoint definition were censored on the date of participant's last contact in Part 1 or Part 2. Time to death or permanent ventilation data was summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves based on randomization in Part 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Integrated Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Death or Permanent Ventilation
|
NA weeks
Interval 72.7 to
Median and 95% confidence interval (CI) were not estimable due to low number events of permanent ventilation or death.
|
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval (CI) were not estimable due to low number events of permanent ventilation or death.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 1184Population: Integrated data for Part 1 and Part 2 was analyzed based on the FAS population defined for Part 1. Part 1 FAS population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1 and 2. The treatment groups for the integrated analysis of Part 1 and Part 2 were planned for Early-start BIIB105 120 mg and Placebo/Delayed-start BIIB105, and results are reported for these treatment groups.
Time to death was defined as the time from first dose to death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=48 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Integrated Parts 1 and 2: Time to Death
|
NA weeks
Median and 95% CI were not estimable due to low number of events of death.
|
NA weeks
Median and 95% CI were not estimable due to low number of events of death.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 1184Population: As per the changes to the protocol-specified analyses mentioned in the SAP, time to death, incorporating post-study withdrawal or study completion vital status data was not performed as post-study withdrawal vital status data was not collected at the time of this analysis. The treatment groups for the integrated analysis of Part 1 and Part 2 were planned for Early-start BIIB105 120 mg and Placebo/Delayed-start BIIB105, and results are reported for these treatment groups.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 169, 337, 505 and 673Population: The PK analysis population is defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 postdose serum and/or CSF BIIB105 measurement. 'Number analyzed' indicates the number of participants evaluable at the specified time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=19 Participants
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=51 Participants
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 120 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 2: Serum Concentration of BIIB105
Day 1
|
0.50 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
1.47 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 139.00
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part 2: Serum Concentration of BIIB105
Day 169
|
1.25 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 186.75
|
3.50 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 151.48
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part 2: Serum Concentration of BIIB105
Day 337
|
2.46 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 333.20
|
2.50 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 95.95
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part 2: Serum Concentration of BIIB105
Day 505
|
3.53 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 340.11
|
8.54 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.00
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Part 2: Serum Concentration of BIIB105
Day 673
|
18.89 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 164.41
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
Part 2: BIIB105 60 mg
Part 2: BIIB105 120 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=28 participants at risk
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=11 participants at risk
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
n=48 participants at risk
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received BIIB105 120 mg, IT, as 3 loading doses administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=19 participants at risk
Participants from cohorts A-C2, who received 5, 20 and 60 mg doses of BIIB105 and placebo in Part 1 and completed Week 25 (Day 175) visit in Part 1 received BIIB105 60 mg in Part 2.
|
Part 2: BIIB105 120 mg
n=51 participants at risk
Participants from Cohorts D1 and D2 who received 120 mg dose of BIIB105 and placebo in Part 1 and completed Week 25 (Day 176) visit in Part 1 received BIIB105 120 mg in Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia aspiration
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary sepsis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Craniofacial fracture
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Jaw fracture
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Malnutrition
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Seronegative arthritis
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Plasma cell myeloma
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Balance disorder
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Radiculopathy
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Toxic encephalopathy
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.9%
3/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Part 1: Pooled Placebo 1+2
n=28 participants at risk
Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts A, B, C1 and C2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105-matched placebo, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15 and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks. Participants with ALS and polyQ-ALS from Cohorts D1 and D2 received 3 loading doses of BIIB105- matched placebo administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort A: BIIB105 5 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 5mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohort B: BIIB105 20 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Participants with ALS received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 20 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts C1+C2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=11 participants at risk
Participants with ALS (Cohort C1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort C2) received 3 loading doses of BIIB105 60 mg, IT, administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 2 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57 and 85), for a total of 5 doses over approximately 13 weeks.
|
Part 1: Cohorts D1 + D2: BIIB105 120 mg
n=48 participants at risk
Participants with ALS (Cohort D1) and polyQ-ALS (Cohort D2) received BIIB105 120 mg, IT, as 3 loading doses administered every 2 weeks (on Days 1, 15, and 29), followed by 5 maintenance doses administered once every 4 weeks (on Days 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169), for a total of 8 doses over approximately 25 weeks.
|
Part 2: BIIB105 60 mg
n=19 participants at risk
Participants from cohorts A-C2, who received 5, 20 and 60 mg doses of BIIB105 and placebo in Part 1 and completed Week 25 (Day 175) visit in Part 1 received BIIB105 60 mg in Part 2.
|
Part 2: BIIB105 120 mg
n=51 participants at risk
Participants from Cohorts D1 and D2 who received 120 mg dose of BIIB105 and placebo in Part 1 and completed Week 25 (Day 176) visit in Part 1 received BIIB105 120 mg in Part 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Investigations
Blood uric acid increased
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Investigations
Csf white blood cell count increased
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
12.5%
6/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
15.8%
3/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
13.7%
7/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Investigations
Breath sounds abnormal
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Investigations
Csf protein increased
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
22.9%
11/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
21.1%
4/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
13.7%
7/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Hypoacusis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo positional
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
31.6%
6/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
13.7%
7/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
14.6%
7/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
21.1%
4/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
7.8%
4/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
10.7%
3/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
27.3%
3/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.4%
5/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
21.1%
4/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophagitis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral dysaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Salivary hypersecretion
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
6.2%
3/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.4%
5/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
7.8%
4/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
8.3%
4/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
10.7%
3/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
45.5%
5/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
8/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
15.8%
3/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
13.7%
7/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Medical device site burn
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
6.2%
3/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.8%
5/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Swelling face
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
General disorders
Vaccination site pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
8.3%
4/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
21.1%
4/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
11.8%
6/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
7.8%
4/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
6.2%
3/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
11.8%
6/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Stoma site infection
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.9%
3/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bone contusion
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
6.2%
3/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Concussion
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.4%
5/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
50.0%
14/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
66.7%
4/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
36.4%
4/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
37.5%
18/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
47.4%
9/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
37.3%
19/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Immunisation reaction
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Musculoskeletal procedural complication
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Neurological procedural complication
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post lumbar puncture syndrome
|
25.0%
7/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
50.0%
3/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
54.5%
6/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
31.2%
15/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
36.8%
7/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
13.7%
7/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural contusion
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural discomfort
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural inflammation
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural swelling
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural complication
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural dizziness
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural nausea
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
18.2%
2/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
53.6%
15/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
83.3%
5/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
66.7%
4/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
63.6%
7/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
52.1%
25/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
68.4%
13/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
39.2%
20/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural vomiting
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Shoulder fracture
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
27.3%
3/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.9%
3/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
18.2%
2/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.9%
3/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stoma site discharge
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stoma site pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
21.1%
4/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
11.8%
6/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
50.0%
3/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
36.4%
4/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
12.5%
6/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
15.8%
3/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
21.6%
11/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
27.3%
3/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
25.0%
12/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Mobility decreased
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
21.4%
6/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
36.4%
4/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
6.2%
3/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle tightness
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
10.7%
3/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
18.8%
9/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
15.8%
3/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
13.7%
7/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
18.2%
2/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.8%
5/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
18.2%
2/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
14.6%
7/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
13.7%
7/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
18.2%
2/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
15.8%
3/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
25.0%
7/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
18.2%
2/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
22.9%
11/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
21.1%
4/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
13.7%
7/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Balance disorder
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
12.5%
6/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.9%
3/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain fog
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Clonus
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cluster headache
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorder
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
10.7%
3/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
18.2%
2/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
8/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.8%
5/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Head discomfort
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
42.9%
12/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
50.0%
3/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
66.7%
4/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
45.5%
5/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
58.3%
28/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
26.3%
5/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
37.3%
19/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemihypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Menstrual headache
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Muscle contractions involuntary
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
8.3%
4/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Parosmia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Pleocytosis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
12.5%
6/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
15.8%
3/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
7.8%
4/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Post-traumatic headache
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Radicular pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Speech disorder
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Product Issues
Device dislocation
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Affect lability
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
8.3%
4/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
3.9%
2/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
15.8%
3/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.8%
5/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
14.3%
4/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
7.8%
4/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.9%
3/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea at rest
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngospasm
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal polyps
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory tract congestion
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus ulcer
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
10.5%
2/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.9%
3/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nodular rash
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
7.1%
2/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
4.2%
2/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.1%
1/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
11.8%
6/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
9.1%
1/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
3.6%
1/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Flushing
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/28 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/11 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
0.00%
0/48 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
5.3%
1/19 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
2.0%
1/51 • From first dose of the study drug up to end of follow up period in Part 1 (up to Day 260) and Part 2 (up to Day 1184)
The Part 1 safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 1. The Part 2 safety analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment in Part 2.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Our agreement is subject to confidentiality but generally the PI can publish, for noncommercial purposes only, results and methods of the trial, but no other Sponsor Confidential Information. PI must give Sponsor no less than 60 days to review any manuscript for a proposed publication and must delay publication for up to an additional 90 days thereafter if Sponsor needs to file any patent application to protect any of Sponsor's intellectual property contained in the proposed publication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER