Correlation Between Dorsalis Pedis and Radial Arterial Invasive Blood Pressures During Anesthesia Induction in Neurosurgical Patients

NCT04469751 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2020-07-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Anesthesiologists need to understand the specific difference between dorsalis pedis arterial(DPA) pressure and the more commonly used radial arterial(RA) pressure When blood pressure monitoring at DPA. Generally, the systolic blood pressure measured in DPA is significantly higher than that in RA, with little difference of diastolic blood pressure and mean artery pressure in two sites. However, there is no specific study on the difference between them, and it is not clear how the diagnosis and treatment threshold should be adjusted when relying on DPA blood pressure measurement to guide treatment. The intraoperative blood pressure of patients is in the normal range in most cases. The purpose of this study is to analyze the correlation of different blood pressure stratification (RASBP90-109mmHg,110-129mmHg,130-149mmHg) of DPA-RA in the normal range to understand the correlation of DPA-RA in different blood pressure ranges, to provide a reference for clinical decision-making and hemodynamic management.

Conditions

  • Blood Pressure

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

invasive blood pressure monitoring

radial artery and dorsalis pedis artery intubated with BD Insyte-W 22G artery puncture needle under local anaesthesia

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-10-01
Primary Completion
2020-03-01
Completion
2020-05-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04469751 on ClinicalTrials.gov