Trial Outcomes & Findings for Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Hydrocortisone Acetate Suppositories (NCT NCT04469686)

NCT ID: NCT04469686

Last Updated: 2026-08-06

Results Overview

The primary efficacy endpoint was specified as the between-treatment group (HCA Suppository 90 mg bid versus placebo and HCA Suppository 90 mg qd versus placebo) difference in the proportion of subjects with clinical remission at the End of Treatment visit (Day 29). Clinical remission was defined as a Modified Mayo Total Score of 0 to 2, with stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 (minimum 1 point decrease from baseline), rectal bleeding subscore of 0, and endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

200 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

29 days

Results posted on

2026-08-06

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Twice Daily - Active
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Once Daily - Active
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Placebo
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Overall Study
STARTED
67
67
66
Overall Study
COMPLETED
57
56
58
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
10
11
8

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Twice Daily - Active
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Once Daily - Active
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Placebo
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Overall Study
Physician Decision
1
3
2
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
1
2
Overall Study
Adverse Event
4
2
3
Overall Study
Randomization problem
0
1
0
Overall Study
Pregnancy
0
0
1
Overall Study
Geopolitical tension
1
0
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
4
0
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
2
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

Age was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Once Daily - Active
n=67 Participants
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Placebo
n=66 Participants
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Twice Daily - Active
n=67 Participants
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.15 • n=20 Participants • Age was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
42.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.32 • n=20 Participants • Age was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.19 • n=40 Participants • Age was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
43.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.90 • n=6 Participants • Age was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants
n=20 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
35 Participants
n=20 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
37 Participants
n=40 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
109 Participants
n=6 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants
n=20 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
31 Participants
n=20 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
30 Participants
n=40 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
91 Participants
n=6 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
54 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
52 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
54 Participants
n=40 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
160 Participants
n=6 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Native
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=6 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
10 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
13 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
12 Participants
n=40 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
35 Participants
n=6 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
3 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
5 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
France
3 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
4 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
11 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Germany
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
3 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
India
9 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
6 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
19 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Italy
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
3 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Jordan
3 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
3 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
10 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Lebanon
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Moldova
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Philippines
6 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
3 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
11 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Poland
11 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
11 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
15 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
37 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Romania
5 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
9 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
9 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
23 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Russia
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Spain
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
5 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Turkey (Türkiye)
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
5 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
5 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
11 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
16 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
11 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
42 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 3
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
5 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 4
16 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
13 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
7 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
36 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 5
21 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
18 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
20 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
59 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 6
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
23 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
20 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
63 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 7
8 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
8 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
14 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
30 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 8
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
4 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
7 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Disease History by Study Treatment
Proctitis
41 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
48 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
41 Participants
n=40 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
130 Participants
n=6 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Disease History by Study Treatment
Proctosigmoiditis
11 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
9 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
11 Participants
n=40 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
31 Participants
n=6 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Disease History by Study Treatment
Left sided colitis
11 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
6 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
6 Participants
n=40 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
23 Participants
n=6 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Disease History by Study Treatment
Extensive colitis
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Disease History by Study Treatment
Pancolitis
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
7 Participants
n=40 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
10 Participants
n=6 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 29 days

Population: The reduction from 67 participants to 66 participants in the Once Daily Active arm was due to a randomization error.

The primary efficacy endpoint was specified as the between-treatment group (HCA Suppository 90 mg bid versus placebo and HCA Suppository 90 mg qd versus placebo) difference in the proportion of subjects with clinical remission at the End of Treatment visit (Day 29). Clinical remission was defined as a Modified Mayo Total Score of 0 to 2, with stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 (minimum 1 point decrease from baseline), rectal bleeding subscore of 0, and endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Twice Daily - Active
n=67 Participants
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Once Daily - Active
n=66 Participants
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Placebo
n=66 Participants
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Clinical Remission
11 Participants
Interval 1.3126 to 60.7941
14 Participants
Interval 1.5305 to 69.1744
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 29 days

Population: The reduction in participants of the Once Daily arm is due to a randomization error.

Reduction of stool frequency measured using Mayo Scoring sub score of stool frequency to assess the change in stool frequency from Baseline (Day 1) to End of Treatment (Day 29) and from Baseline (Day 1) to Follow-up (Day 15).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Twice Daily - Active
n=67 Participants
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Once Daily - Active
n=66 Participants
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Placebo
n=66 Participants
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Reduction of Stool Frequency
Participants with Reduction in Stool Frequency at End of Treatment
34 participants
38 participants
26 participants
Reduction of Stool Frequency
Participants with Reduction in Stool Frequency at Follow-up
27 participants
32 participants
21 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 29 days

Population: The reduction in QD Active participants is due to a randomization error.

Rectal Bleeding measured using Mayo Scoring sub-score of rectal bleeding equal to assess the change in rectal bleeding in active treatment groups vs. placebo group from Baseline (Day 1) to End of Treatment (Day 29) and from Baseline (Day 1) to Follow-up (Day 15).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Twice Daily - Active
n=67 Participants
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Once Daily - Active
n=66 Participants
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Placebo
n=66 Participants
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Rectal Bleeding
Rectal Bleeding Score: 0, End of Treatment · Rectal Bleeding Score: 0, End of Treatment
34 Participants
31 Participants
10 Participants
Rectal Bleeding
Rectal Bleeding Score: 0, Follow-up · Rectal Bleeding Score: 0, End of Treatment
21 Participants
26 Participants
11 Participants

Adverse Events

Twice Daily - Active

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Once Daily - Active

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 9 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 8 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Twice Daily - Active
n=67 participants at risk
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Once Daily - Active
n=67 participants at risk
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Placebo
n=66 participants at risk
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
4.5%
3/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
0.00%
0/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
3.0%
2/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
3.0%
2/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
Endocrine disorders
Blood glucose increased
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
0.00%
0/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
1.5%
1/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
4.5%
3/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
General disorders
Pyrexia
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
0.00%
0/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
3.0%
2/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
0.00%
0/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
Renal and urinary disorders
Leukocyturia
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
1.5%
1/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
1.5%
1/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.

Additional Information

Chief Scientific Officer

Cristcot

Phone: 978-212-6380

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PIs are restricted from publication of data related to the study unless prior written authorization has been granted by the Sponsor.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER