Trial Outcomes & Findings for Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Hydrocortisone Acetate Suppositories (NCT NCT04469686)
NCT ID: NCT04469686
Last Updated: 2026-08-06
Results Overview
The primary efficacy endpoint was specified as the between-treatment group (HCA Suppository 90 mg bid versus placebo and HCA Suppository 90 mg qd versus placebo) difference in the proportion of subjects with clinical remission at the End of Treatment visit (Day 29). Clinical remission was defined as a Modified Mayo Total Score of 0 to 2, with stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 (minimum 1 point decrease from baseline), rectal bleeding subscore of 0, and endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
200 participants
29 days
2026-08-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Twice Daily - Active
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Once Daily - Active
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Placebo
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
67
|
67
|
66
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
57
|
56
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
11
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Twice Daily - Active
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Once Daily - Active
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Placebo
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Randomization problem
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Geopolitical tension
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Age was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Once Daily - Active
n=67 Participants
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Placebo
n=66 Participants
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Twice Daily - Active
n=67 Participants
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.15 • n=20 Participants • Age was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
42.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.32 • n=20 Participants • Age was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.19 • n=40 Participants • Age was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
43.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.90 • n=6 Participants • Age was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
37 Participants
n=20 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
35 Participants
n=20 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
37 Participants
n=40 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
109 Participants
n=6 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
30 Participants
n=20 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
31 Participants
n=20 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
30 Participants
n=40 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
91 Participants
n=6 Participants • Sex was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
54 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
52 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
54 Participants
n=40 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
160 Participants
n=6 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Native
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
10 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
13 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
12 Participants
n=40 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
35 Participants
n=6 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • Race/ethnicity was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
3 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
5 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
3 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
4 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
11 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
3 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
India
|
9 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
6 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
19 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
3 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Jordan
|
3 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
3 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
10 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Lebanon
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Moldova
|
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Philippines
|
6 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
3 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
11 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
11 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
11 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
15 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
37 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Romania
|
5 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
9 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
9 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
23 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Russia
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
5 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Turkey (Türkiye)
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
5 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
5 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
11 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
15 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
16 Participants
n=20 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
11 Participants
n=40 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
42 Participants
n=6 Participants • Region of enrollment was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 3
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
5 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 4
|
16 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
13 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
7 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
36 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 5
|
21 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
18 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
20 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
59 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 6
|
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
23 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
20 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
63 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 7
|
8 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
8 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
14 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
30 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Modified Mayo Score
Total Score: 8
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
4 Participants
n=40 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
7 Participants
n=6 Participants • Modified Mayo Score was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Disease History by Study Treatment
Proctitis
|
41 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
48 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
41 Participants
n=40 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
130 Participants
n=6 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Disease History by Study Treatment
Proctosigmoiditis
|
11 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
9 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
11 Participants
n=40 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
31 Participants
n=6 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Disease History by Study Treatment
Left sided colitis
|
11 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
6 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
6 Participants
n=40 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
23 Participants
n=6 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Disease History by Study Treatment
Extensive colitis
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
|
Disease History by Study Treatment
Pancolitis
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
7 Participants
n=40 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
10 Participants
n=6 Participants • Disease history was summarized using the Full Analysis Set (FAS) by randomized treatment assignment.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 29 daysPopulation: The reduction from 67 participants to 66 participants in the Once Daily Active arm was due to a randomization error.
The primary efficacy endpoint was specified as the between-treatment group (HCA Suppository 90 mg bid versus placebo and HCA Suppository 90 mg qd versus placebo) difference in the proportion of subjects with clinical remission at the End of Treatment visit (Day 29). Clinical remission was defined as a Modified Mayo Total Score of 0 to 2, with stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 (minimum 1 point decrease from baseline), rectal bleeding subscore of 0, and endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Twice Daily - Active
n=67 Participants
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Once Daily - Active
n=66 Participants
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Placebo
n=66 Participants
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Remission
|
11 Participants
Interval 1.3126 to 60.7941
|
14 Participants
Interval 1.5305 to 69.1744
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 29 daysPopulation: The reduction in participants of the Once Daily arm is due to a randomization error.
Reduction of stool frequency measured using Mayo Scoring sub score of stool frequency to assess the change in stool frequency from Baseline (Day 1) to End of Treatment (Day 29) and from Baseline (Day 1) to Follow-up (Day 15).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Twice Daily - Active
n=67 Participants
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Once Daily - Active
n=66 Participants
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Placebo
n=66 Participants
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Reduction of Stool Frequency
Participants with Reduction in Stool Frequency at End of Treatment
|
34 participants
|
38 participants
|
26 participants
|
|
Reduction of Stool Frequency
Participants with Reduction in Stool Frequency at Follow-up
|
27 participants
|
32 participants
|
21 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 29 daysPopulation: The reduction in QD Active participants is due to a randomization error.
Rectal Bleeding measured using Mayo Scoring sub-score of rectal bleeding equal to assess the change in rectal bleeding in active treatment groups vs. placebo group from Baseline (Day 1) to End of Treatment (Day 29) and from Baseline (Day 1) to Follow-up (Day 15).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Twice Daily - Active
n=67 Participants
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Once Daily - Active
n=66 Participants
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Placebo
n=66 Participants
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rectal Bleeding
Rectal Bleeding Score: 0, End of Treatment · Rectal Bleeding Score: 0, End of Treatment
|
34 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Rectal Bleeding
Rectal Bleeding Score: 0, Follow-up · Rectal Bleeding Score: 0, End of Treatment
|
21 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Twice Daily - Active
Once Daily - Active
Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Twice Daily - Active
n=67 participants at risk
Twice daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Once Daily - Active
n=67 participants at risk
Once daily 90 mg hydrocortisone acetate and once daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
Placebo
n=66 participants at risk
Twice daily placebo suppository administered with Sephure suppository applicator
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
4.5%
3/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
3.0%
2/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
3.0%
2/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Blood glucose increased
|
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
4.5%
3/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
3.0%
2/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Leukocyturia
|
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
1.5%
1/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
3.0%
2/67 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse events were reported from time of screening until end of trial (Safety and Symptom Follow-up Visit), 73 days.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PIs are restricted from publication of data related to the study unless prior written authorization has been granted by the Sponsor.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER