Trial Outcomes & Findings for COVID-19 and the Healthy Minds Program for Educators (NCT NCT04426318)
NCT ID: NCT04426318
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Results Overview
Psychological distress will be assessed by aggregating 3 measures: PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression, and the NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale. Averages will be z-scored with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation 1. Higher scores indicate increased psychological distress.
COMPLETED
NA
698 participants
baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)
2024-09-19
Participant Flow
8321 Wisconsin school system employees invited, 1136 self-screened for eligibility, 353 ineligible (for prior medication, prior HMP app use, or depression t-score greater than 70), 698 consented, 32 did not complete a pre-test, 666 assigned to an arm.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
346
|
320
|
|
Overall Study
Failed Attention Checks
|
4
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Downloaded HMP App
|
329
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Completed T2 Assessment
|
281
|
280
|
|
Overall Study
Completed T3 Assessment
|
261
|
274
|
|
Overall Study
Completed T4 Assessment
|
261
|
275
|
|
Overall Study
Completed T5 Assessment
|
284
|
293
|
|
Overall Study
Completed T6 Assessment
|
286
|
293
|
|
Overall Study
Final Intent to Treat Sample
|
344
|
318
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
344
|
318
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
failed attention checks and had their data removed from analyses
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
COVID-19 and the Healthy Minds Program for Educators
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
Total
n=662 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
under 20 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
20-30 years
|
55 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
30-40 years
|
105 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
195 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
40-50 years
|
103 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
196 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
50-60 years
|
61 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
140 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
over 60 years
|
20 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
302 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
281 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
583 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
42 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Non-Binary
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian / Alaskan Native
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian / Pacific Islander
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black / African American
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic / Latino
|
15 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White / Caucasian
|
315 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
287 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
602 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
344 participants
n=99 Participants
|
318 participants
n=107 Participants
|
662 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Highest Level of Education
less than 7 years formal education
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Highest Level of Education
Graduated High School
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Highest Level of Education
Some College
|
24 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Highest Level of Education
Graduated College
|
100 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
203 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Highest Level of Education
Advanced Degree
|
208 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
178 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
386 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Highest Level of Education
NA
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Household Income
Less than $20,000
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Household Income
$20,000 - $40,000
|
22 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Household Income
$40,000 - $70,000
|
80 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
162 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Household Income
$70,000 - $100,000
|
87 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
161 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Household Income
$100,000 - $200,000
|
135 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
121 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
256 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Household Income
greater than $200,000
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Household Income
Unknown
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Employment Category
Classroom Teacher
|
144 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
278 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Employment Category
Classroom Support
|
47 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Employment Category
Special Education Teacher
|
29 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Employment Category
School Support
|
38 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Employment Category
School Administrator
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Employment Category
System Staff
|
20 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Employment Category
Other / Unknown
|
58 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
Psychological distress will be assessed by aggregating 3 measures: PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression, and the NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale. Averages will be z-scored with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation 1. Higher scores indicate increased psychological distress.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress Scale
Baseline
|
0.00 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
0.00 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Change From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress Scale
Week 2
|
-0.40 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
-0.10 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Change From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress Scale
Week 3
|
-0.55 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
-0.14 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
|
Change From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress Scale
Week 1
|
-0.29 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-0.10 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
|
Change From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress Scale
Week 4
|
-0.67 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-0.20 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Change From Baseline on an Aggregate Measure of Psychological Distress That Averages the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depressive Measures and the NIH Perceived Stress Scale
Week 16
|
-0.55 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
-0.24 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
A measure of acting with mindful awareness. The total possible range in scores is 8-40, with higher scores indicating greater levels of this facet of mindfulness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscale
baseline
|
24.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.93
|
24.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.12
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscale
Week 1
|
24.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.62
|
25.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.15
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscale
Week 2
|
25.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.47
|
25.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.44
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscale
Week 3
|
26.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.61
|
26.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.21
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscale
Week 4
|
27.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.67
|
26.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.76
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness Subscale
Week 16
|
27.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.32
|
26.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
Psychological distancing (i.e., defusion) will be assessed with the 10-item Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS). The total possible range in scores is 0-50, with higher scores indicating greater levels of psychological distancing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)
Week 3
|
29.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.73
|
27.52 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.07
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)
Week 16
|
30.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.69
|
28.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.57
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)
baseline
|
24.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.89
|
24.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.23
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)
Week 1
|
27.14 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.72
|
26.26 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.31
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)
Week 2
|
28.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.42
|
26.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.73
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS)
Week 4
|
31.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.54
|
27.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
The Meaning in Life Questionnaire Presence subscale will be used to measure perceptions of meaning and purpose in life. The total possible range in scores is 5 - 35 with higher scores indicating greater levels of meaning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire
baseline
|
26.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.44
|
25.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.46
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire
Week 1
|
26.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.13
|
26.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.38
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire
Week 2
|
27.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.14
|
25.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.68
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire
Week 3
|
27.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.92
|
26.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.83
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire
Week 4
|
27.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.35
|
26.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.07
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire
Week 16
|
27.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.14
|
26.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, after weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
A measure of loneliness (i.e, lack of social connectedness). The total possible range in scores is 1-5, representing the average across all items; higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scale
Week 4
|
2.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
2.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
|
Change From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scale
Week 16
|
2.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
2.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
|
Change From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scale
baseline
|
2.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
2.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
|
Change From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scale
Week 1
|
2.34 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
2.49 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
|
Change From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scale
Week 2
|
2.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
2.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
|
Change From Baseline on the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Scale
Week 3
|
2.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
2.37 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baselinePopulation: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
The Conway COVID Questionnaire is a new, 16-tem measure of coronavirus related distress and related experiences. Subscales include: perceived threat, financial scale, resource scale, psychological scale, symptoms scale, proximity to others scale, and news scale. Ratings from 1 to 7 with 1 = "not true of me at all" and 7 = "very true of me" with higher scores representing greater perceived threat. Mean for each subscale reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=342 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=315 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Threat Subscale
|
5.05 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
5.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Financial Subscale
|
3.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
3.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Proximity Subscale
|
3.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.70
|
2.99 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
News Subscale
|
4.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
4.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Psychological Subscale
|
4.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.45
|
4.39 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Resource Subscale
|
2.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
2.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Symptoms Subscale
|
1.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
1.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 weeks (post intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
The Conway COVID Questionnaire is a new, 16-tem measure of coronavirus related distress and related experiences. Subscales include: perceived threat, financial scale, resource scale, psychological scale, symptoms scale, proximity to others scale, and news scale. Ratings from 1 to 7 with 1 = "not true of me at all" and 7 = "very true of me" with higher scores representing greater perceived threat. Mean for each subscale reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=280 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=289 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Financial Subscale
|
3.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
2.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
News Subscale
|
3.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
3.66 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Proximity Subscale
|
3.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.67
|
3.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Psychological Subscale
|
3.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
4.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Resource Subscale
|
1.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
1.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Symptoms Subscale
|
1.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Threat Subscale
|
4.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
4.74 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
The Conway COVID Questionnaire is a new, 16-tem measure of coronavirus related distress and related experiences. Subscales include: perceived threat, financial scale, resource scale, psychological scale, symptoms scale, proximity to others scale, and news scale. Ratings from 1 to 7 with 1 = "not true of me at all" and 7 = "very true of me" with higher scores representing greater perceived threat. Mean for each subscale reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=280 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=289 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
News Subscale
|
3.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.58
|
3.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Financial Subscale
|
2.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.97
|
3.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Proximity Subscale
|
4.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
4.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Psychological Subscale
|
3.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
4.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.58
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Resource Subscale
|
1.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
1.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Symptoms Subscale
|
1.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
2.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.48
|
|
Conway COVID Questionnaire Subscale Scores
Threat Subscale
|
4.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
4.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
The Self-Compassion Scale Short Form will be used to measure self-compassion. The total possible range in scores is 12-60, with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-compassion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Compassion Scale Short Form Score
baseline
|
35.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.25
|
35.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.42
|
|
Self-Compassion Scale Short Form Score
Week 4
|
40.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.75
|
36.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.36
|
|
Self-Compassion Scale Short Form Score
Week 16
|
40.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.62
|
38.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
Negative ruminative thinking will be measured with the Perseverative Thought Questionnaire. The total possible range in scores is 0-60, with higher scores indicating greater levels negative ruminative thinking.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought Questionnaire
baseline
|
29.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.43
|
29.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.29
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought Questionnaire
Week 4
|
24.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.71
|
28.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.37
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Perseverative Thought Questionnaire
Week 16
|
23.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.74
|
25.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
Well-being will be measured using the WHO-5. The total possible range in scores is 0-25, with higher scores indicating greater levels of well-being.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being Scale
baseline
|
12.76 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.71
|
12.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.33
|
|
Change From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being Scale
Week 4
|
15.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.33
|
12.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.84
|
|
Change From Baseline on the World Health Organization 5-item (WHO-5) Well-being Scale
Week 16
|
14.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.64
|
12.59 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.74
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
The Neutral Face Rating task is a novel measure of prosocial construal (average likability ratings) and race bias (average liking of white faces minus the average liking of black faces). Total score for prosocial construal is from 1 to 7, with higher scores representing greater prosocial construal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construal
16 weeks
|
4.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
4.37 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construal
baseline
|
4.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
4.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Prosocial Construal
4 weeks
|
4.42 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
4.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
The Neutral Face Rating task is a novel measure of prosocial construal (average likability ratings) and race bias (average liking of white faces minus the average liking of black faces). Total score for race bias range from -6 to 6, with higher scores representing greater bias favoring white faces (negative scores on the bias measure indicate bias for liking black faces more than white faces).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Bias
baseline
|
-0.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
-0.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Bias
4 weeks
|
-0.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
-0.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Neutral Face Rating Task: Race Bias
16 weeks
|
-0.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
-0.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 4 weeks (post intervention)Population: not all participants returned surveys for each time point
A measure of fixed versus incremental mindset regarding well-being. The average across items for a possible range in scores from 1-6 will be measured, with higher scores indicating greater levels of incremental views on well-being (i.e., it can be learned).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=342 Participants
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=314 Participants
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on the Growth Mindset Scale for Well-Being
baseline
|
5.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
4.94 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Change From Baseline on the Growth Mindset Scale for Well-Being
4 weeks
|
5.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
4.87 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Every other day when participant completes a practice (up to 4 weeks)4-tems following each app-based practice for treatment participants that ask about perceive quality of the practice, (1 poor, 9 very good), and mood (1 poor, 5 good).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: After weeks 1, 2, and 3 during the intervention, 4 weeks (post intervention), 16 weeks (3 months post-intervention) - Intervention group onlyA measure of working alliance in a digital environment that will be averaged across all items for a score range from 1 to 7, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of alliance.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
Wait-list Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program Foundations Training
n=344 participants at risk
Healthy Minds Program (HMP) is a novel, smartphone-based app that provides a series of guided meditation practices on four primary constituents of well-being: Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. All program elements are introduced with a summary of the scientific evidence supporting its constituent elements (e.g., Awareness and well-being). In addition to standard sitting meditation practices found in many meditation-based behavioral interventions, the HMP offers active practices in which participants can develop the same skills but while embedding practice into activities they already do in their normal daily routine.
|
Wait-list Control
n=318 participants at risk
Participants assigned to the wait-list control will not receive treatment for the intervention and follow-up period. They will be provided access to the HMP Foundations training after completing follow-up testing.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
None to Slight Depression at Baseline
|
50.9%
175/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
50.3%
160/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Mild Depression at Baseline
|
23.3%
80/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
20.4%
65/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Moderate Depression at Baseline
|
25.3%
87/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
27.4%
87/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Severe Depression at Baseline
|
0.29%
1/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
0.94%
3/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
None to Slight Depression at 4 weeks
|
63.4%
218/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
54.1%
172/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Mild Depression at 4 weeks
|
10.5%
36/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
16.0%
51/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Moderate Depression at 4 weeks
|
7.3%
25/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
19.2%
61/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Severe Depression at 4 weeks
|
0.29%
1/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
1.6%
5/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
None to Slight Depression at 16 weeks
|
59.6%
205/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
53.8%
171/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Mild Depression at 16 weeks
|
13.4%
46/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
17.9%
57/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Moderate Depression at 16 weeks
|
8.7%
30/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
19.2%
61/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Severe Depression at 16 weeks
|
0.29%
1/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
0.31%
1/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
None to Slight Anxiety at Baseline
|
22.4%
77/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
21.7%
69/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Mild Anxiety at Baseline
|
28.5%
98/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
31.1%
99/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Moderate Anxiety at Baseline
|
44.8%
154/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
40.9%
130/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Severe Anxiety at Baseline
|
4.1%
14/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
5.3%
17/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
None to Slight Anxiety at 4 weeks
|
38.7%
133/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
28.6%
91/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Mild Anxiety at 4 weeks
|
21.8%
75/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
25.2%
80/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Moderate Anxiety at 4 weeks
|
20.1%
69/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
33.0%
105/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Severe Anxiety at 4 weeks
|
0.87%
3/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
4.1%
13/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
None to Slight Anxiety at 16 weeks
|
32.8%
113/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
31.4%
100/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Mild Anxiety at 16 weeks
|
25.9%
89/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
25.2%
80/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Moderate Anxiety at 16 weeks
|
23.0%
79/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
30.2%
96/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Severe Anxiety at 16 weeks
|
0.29%
1/344 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
3.1%
10/318 • up to 16 weeks
Anxiety and depression scores were characterized separately at T1 (baseline), T5 (4 weeks), and T6 (16 weeks) based on normative none-to-slight, mild, moderate, and severe symptoms from PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression scores (i.e., T-score \<55, 55≥ \<60, 60≥ \<70, and ≥70; Pilkonis et al., 2011).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place