Trial Outcomes & Findings for The SQUID Trial for the Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (STEM) (NCT NCT04410146)
NCT ID: NCT04410146
Last Updated: 2026-06-04
Results Overview
Treatment failure as defined by the occurrence of any of the following events: 1. Residual or re-accumulation of the SDH (≥10 mm) on 180-day scan from intervention. 2. Re-operation (after index procedure) or surgical rescue within 180-days of intervention. 3. Any new, major disabling stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or death from any (neurological) cause within 180-days of intervention.
COMPLETED
NA
319 participants
On 180-day from intervention
2026-06-04
Participant Flow
A total of 319 participants were enrolled; 9 were screen failure, resulting in an Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population of 310 participants randomized (1:1) to either SQUID embolization (treatment) or Standard Medical Management (control). If assigned by the treating team to Surgical Management, subjects were either assigned to SQUID Embolization followed by surgery (treatment) or to Surgery only (control).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Treatment Group (SQUID)
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Control Group (No Embolization)
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
149
|
161
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
114
|
118
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
35
|
43
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Treatment Group (Embolization With SQUID)
n=149 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Control Group (No Embolization)
n=161 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Total
n=310 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
72.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.35 • n=9 Participants
|
73.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.31 • n=27 Participants
|
73.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.85 • n=267 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
97 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
119 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
216 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
52 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
11 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
114 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
124 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
238 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
24 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American or Alaskan Native
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
0 Participants
n=267 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
9 Participants
n=9 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
16 Participants
n=267 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
8 Participants
n=9 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
15 Participants
n=27 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
23 Participants
n=267 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
0 Participants
n=267 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
105 Participants
n=9 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
108 Participants
n=27 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
213 Participants
n=267 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
|
26 Participants
n=9 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
31 Participants
n=27 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
57 Participants
n=267 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
2 Participants
n=9 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
3 Participants
n=267 Participants • Participants could self-identify as more than one race, so the sum of the categories does not equal the Total Number of Participants Analyzed.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
128 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
133 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
261 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
12 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
7 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
2 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
77.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.13 • n=9 Participants
|
79.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.31 • n=27 Participants
|
78.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.24 • n=267 Participants
|
|
Height
|
171.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.76 • n=9 Participants
|
172.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.64 • n=27 Participants
|
172.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.78 • n=267 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
26.0 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.82 • n=9 Participants
|
26.6 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.73 • n=27 Participants
|
26.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.78 • n=267 Participants
|
|
Smoking History
Current Smoker
|
15 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Smoking History
Previous Smoker
|
56 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
102 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Smoking History
Never Smoked
|
78 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
179 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Addiction - Alcohol
Previous Addiction
|
9 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Addiction - Alcohol
Ongoing Addiction
|
8 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Addiction - Alcohol
None/NA
|
132 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
146 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
278 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Addiction - Drugs/Other Substance Abuse
Previous Addiction
|
2 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Addiction - Drugs/Other Substance Abuse
Ongoing Addiction
|
8 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
|
Addiction - Drugs/Other Substance Abuse
None/NA
|
139 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
155 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
294 Participants
n=267 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: On 180-day from interventionPopulation: Analysis population 117 in Treatment and 123 in Control
Treatment failure as defined by the occurrence of any of the following events: 1. Residual or re-accumulation of the SDH (≥10 mm) on 180-day scan from intervention. 2. Re-operation (after index procedure) or surgical rescue within 180-days of intervention. 3. Any new, major disabling stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or death from any (neurological) cause within 180-days of intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=123 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=117 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint-Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
Treatment failure
|
47 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint-Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
No treatment Failure
|
76 Participants
|
98 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 30-days from interventionPopulation: Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
Major disabling stroke or any death within 30-days from intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=166 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=144 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Safety Endpoint-Number of Participants With Major Disabling Stroke or Any Death Within 30 Days of Intervention
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through 1-year visitPopulation: Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
Number of participants with an adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) adjudicated as probably or causally related to the investigational device or Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=144 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
Any Investigational Device/MMAE Procedure-related AE/SAE
|
—
|
40 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 180-day from interventionThe modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is an ordinal scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke. Scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death): 0: No symptoms 1. No significant disability 2. Slight disability 3. Moderate disability 4. Moderately severe disability 5. Severe disability 6. Dead The Shift Analysis (also known as an ordinal analysis) evaluates the distribution of mRS scores to identify a general improvement or 'shift' across the entire range of the scale, rather than just comparing 'good' vs. 'poor' outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=116 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=117 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
mRS Shift Analysis at 180-day Visit
mRS value 0
|
53 participants
|
57 participants
|
|
mRS Shift Analysis at 180-day Visit
mRS value 1
|
39 participants
|
31 participants
|
|
mRS Shift Analysis at 180-day Visit
mRS value 2
|
4 participants
|
10 participants
|
|
mRS Shift Analysis at 180-day Visit
mRS value 3
|
9 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
mRS Shift Analysis at 180-day Visit
mRS value 4
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
mRS Shift Analysis at 180-day Visit
mRS value 6
|
9 participants
|
12 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 180 daysPopulation: No. of participants with mRS score of ≤ 2
The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a clinician-reported measure used to assess the degree of functional disability or dependence in daily activities following a neurological event. This binary outcome dichotomizes the 7-point scale (0-6) into two categories: Favorable Outcome (mRS 0-2) and Unfavorable Outcome (mRS 3-6). A score of ≤ 2 signifies that the participant is functionally independent and capable of looking after their own affairs without assistance. Results will be reported as the proportion of participants in each treatment arm achieving a score of 0, 1, or 2 at the 180-day follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=116 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=117 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
mRS ≤ 2 (Binary)
|
96 Participants
|
98 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 180 DaysT-scores were used to convert raw data to standardized scale with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher T-score indicates better cognitive performance (a score near 40 indicates a low average to average range). Global neurocognitive performance was assessed by taking the mean T-score for all individual neurocognitive markers (Hopkins Verbal Learning Tests (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Animal Naming, and Trail making tests).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=159 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=144 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
Global Neurocognitive Performance
Baseline Global Mean Score
|
25.8 T-Score
Standard Deviation 15.90
|
26.3 T-Score
Standard Deviation 18.57
|
|
Global Neurocognitive Performance
180-Day Global Mean Score
|
38.6 T-Score
Standard Deviation 11.87
|
40.8 T-Score
Standard Deviation 12.98
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 180-day change from BaselineThe EQ VAS is a 20 cm vertical visual analogue scale that records the patient's self-rated health today. It ranges from 0 (Worst health you can imagine) to 100 (Best health you can imagine).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=159 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=144 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
EQ-5D-5L (Including EQ-VAS) Visual Analogue Scale
|
15.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.10
|
13.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 180 day change from BaselineThe EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol - 5 Dimension - 5 Level) is a standardized, patient-reported instrument used globally to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It assesses health across 5 dimensions-mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression-with 5 levels of severity. The index score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where 1.0 represents 'full health' and 0.0 represents death. A higher score indicates a better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as (180-Day score minus Baseline score)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=81 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=86 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
EQ-5D-5L Index
|
0.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.196
|
0.07 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.147
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Through 180 daysThe number of days (mean) in hospital from baseline through 180 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=159 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=144 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hospital Days
|
5.9 days
Standard Deviation 4.83
|
6.4 days
Standard Deviation 4.37
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 90-day Change from BaselinePopulation: Participants with available data were analyzed- mITT Population
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a standardized tool used to objectively quantify the neurological impairment caused by a stroke. It consists of 15 items assessing areas such as level of consciousness, vision, motor function, sensation, and language. Score Range: Total scores range from 0 to 42. Interpretation: A score of 0 indicates normal function (no symptoms), while higher scores indicate more severe neurological deficit. This outcome measures the mean change in the total NIHSS score from baseline (at enrollment) to the 90-day follow-up
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=159 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=144 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
NIHSS
|
-1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 180 daysThe total number of ICU days from baseline through 180 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=159 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=144 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Days
|
2.3 Days
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
2.6 Days
Standard Deviation 3.73
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 180 days Change from BaselinePopulation: mITT Population
Core Lab Analysis of CT/MRI Images. The thickness of the cSDH was documented separately for the left and right sides.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=159 Participants
Standard Medical Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Treatment Group
n=144 Participants
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
|---|---|---|
|
Imaging Core Lab Assessments (cSDH Thickness and Midline Shift)
Midline shift
|
-5.7 mm
Standard Deviation 3.38
|
-5.5 mm
Standard Deviation 3.44
|
|
Imaging Core Lab Assessments (cSDH Thickness and Midline Shift)
cSDH Thickness (Left)
|
-9.1 mm
Standard Deviation 9.04
|
-9.6 mm
Standard Deviation 9.85
|
|
Imaging Core Lab Assessments (cSDH Thickness and Midline Shift)
cSDH Thickness (Right)
|
-10.6 mm
Standard Deviation 8.73
|
-9.7 mm
Standard Deviation 8.89
|
Adverse Events
Treatment Group (SQUID)
Control Group (No Embolization)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Treatment Group (SQUID)
n=144 participants at risk
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Control Group (No Embolization)
n=166 participants at risk
Standard Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
Other: Medical Management: Standard
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
4.2%
6/144 • Number of events 7 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
1.8%
3/166 • Number of events 3 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysarthria
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
1.2%
2/166 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
1.2%
2/166 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bundle branch block left
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia, obstructive
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gatrointestinal hemorrhage
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus paralytic
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
1.2%
2/166 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic cirrhosis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cholecystitis infective
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia aspiration
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Periorbital cellulitis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Perirectal abscess
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia escherichia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia klebsiella
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
1.8%
3/166 • Number of events 3 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Alcohol poisoning
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Brain herniation
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cardiac function disturbance postoperative
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Drain site complication
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
3.0%
5/166 • Number of events 5 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Craniofacial fracture
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament injury
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pneumocephalus
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural complication
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
1.8%
3/166 • Number of events 3 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Surgical procedure repeated
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
1.2%
2/166 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
11.1%
16/144 • Number of events 18 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
21.7%
36/166 • Number of events 39 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Investigations
Computerised tomogram head abnormal
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Alcoholic ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypervolaemia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bone cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatic cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Leukaemia
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Bell's palsy
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain injury
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain compression
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery occlusion
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral artery occlusion
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular disorder
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Simple partial seizures
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhage intracranial
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
1.8%
3/166 • Number of events 3 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hydrocephalus
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorder
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lacunar infarction
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neurological symptom
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive urgency
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Partial seizures
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Status epilepticus
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery thrombosis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
2.1%
3/144 • Number of events 3 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
VIth nerve paralysis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
1.8%
3/166 • Number of events 4 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung disorder
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.00%
0/166 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Aortic valve incompetence
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome
|
0.00%
0/144 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
0.60%
1/166 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Treatment Group (SQUID)
n=144 participants at risk
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
SQUID Embolization: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
SQUID Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
|
Control Group (No Embolization)
n=166 participants at risk
Standard Management
Surgical Evacuation: Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
Other: Medical Management: Standard
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
5.6%
8/144 • Number of events 8 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
1.2%
2/166 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
6.9%
10/144 • Number of events 10 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
4.2%
7/166 • Number of events 8 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
8.3%
12/144 • Number of events 12 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
6.6%
11/166 • Number of events 12 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infections
|
6.2%
9/144 • Number of events 9 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
2.4%
4/166 • Number of events 4 • 1 year
Any discrepancies in total affected counts reflect the unique number of participants experiencing one or more events within each group. Participants included in the Safety population were analyzed according to the treatment received, regardless of randomization assignment. Ultimately, the Safety analysis population consisted of 144 participants who received SQUID and 166 participants who did not receive SQUID.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The PIs may not submit for publication until after the first to occur: publication of multi-center trial results, notification by Sponsor that submission is no longer planned, or the 18th mo. anniversary of trial completion. The PI may publish if the publication is made in a recognized medical/scientific journal or at a recognized conference. A copy of any proposed publication is given to the Sponsor for review at least 30 days prior to the date of publication/public disclosure.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER