Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Non-Surgical Treatment Options for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS) (NCT NCT04409600)

Comparison of Non-Surgical Treatment Options for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS)

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicates better running ability.

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicates better running ability.

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicates better running ability.

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicate better running ability.

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicate better running ability.

The UWRI is scored based on points assigned from self-reported evaluations of running capability. 9 questions are scored on a Likert Scale from 0 to 4, indicating ranges from incapable to optimal function, respectively. The total score can range from 0-36; higher scores indicate better running ability.

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

A patient reported outcome measure consisting of 1 question that asks the individual to rate their current level of function on a scale from 0-100. A higher score suggests a higher level of function.

Global Rating of Change (GROC) is scored on a Likert Scale ranging from -7 to 7, indicating a range of self-perceived overall change in function at that time point compared to the baseline. Positive higher numbers indicate positive (improvement) and negative lower numbers indicate negative (decline). The participant chooses one number on the scale. Score ranges: (-) 7: A very great deal worse, (-) 6: A great deal worse, (-) 5: Quite a bit worse, (-) 4: Moderately worse, (-) 3: Somewhat worse, (-) 2: A little bit worse, (-) 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same), (+) 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same), (+) 2: A little but better, (+) 3: Somewhat better, (+) 4: Moderately better, (+) 5: Quite a bit better, (+) 6: A great deal better, (+) 7: A very great deal better.

Global Rating of Change (GROC) is scored on a Likert Scale ranging from -7 to 7, indicating a range of self-perceived overall change in function at that time point compared to the baseline. Positive higher numbers indicate positive (improvement) and negative lower numbers indicate negative (decline). The participant chooses one number on the scale. Score ranges: (-) 7: A very great deal worse, (-) 6: A great deal worse, (-) 5: Quite a bit worse, (-) 4: Moderately worse, (-) 3: Somewhat worse, (-) 2: A little bit worse, (-) 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same), (+) 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same), (+) 2: A little but better, (+) 3: Somewhat better, (+) 4: Moderately better, (+) 5: Quite a bit better, (+) 6: A great deal better, (+) 7: A very great deal better.

Global Rating of Change (GROC) is scored on a Likert Scale ranging from -7 to 7, indicating a range of self-perceived overall change in function at that time point compared to the baseline. Positive higher numbers indicate positive (improvement) and negative lower numbers indicate negative (decline). The participant chooses one number on the scale. Score ranges: (-) 7: A very great deal worse, (-) 6: A great deal worse, (-) 5: Quite a bit worse, (-) 4: Moderately worse, (-) 3: Somewhat worse, (-) 2: A little bit worse, (-) 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same), (+) 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same), (+) 2: A little but better, (+) 3: Somewhat better, (+) 4: Moderately better, (+) 5: Quite a bit better, (+) 6: A great deal better, (+) 7: A very great deal better.

Global Rating of Change (GROC) is scored on a Likert Scale ranging from -7 to 7, indicating a range of self-perceived overall change in function at that time point compared to the baseline. Positive higher numbers indicate positive (improvement) and negative lower numbers indicate negative (decline). The participant chooses one number on the scale. Score ranges: (-) 7: A very great deal worse, (-) 6: A great deal worse, (-) 5: Quite a bit worse, (-) 4: Moderately worse, (-) 3: Somewhat worse, (-) 2: A little bit worse, (-) 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same), (+) 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same), (+) 2: A little but better, (+) 3: Somewhat better, (+) 4: Moderately better, (+) 5: Quite a bit better, (+) 6: A great deal better, (+) 7: A very great deal better.

Global Rating of Change (GROC) is scored on a Likert Scale ranging from -7 to 7, indicating a range of self-perceived overall change in function at that time point compared to the baseline. Positive higher numbers indicate positive (improvement) and negative lower numbers indicate negative (decline). The participant chooses one number on the scale. Score ranges: (-) 7: A very great deal worse, (-) 6: A great deal worse, (-) 5: Quite a bit worse, (-) 4: Moderately worse, (-) 3: Somewhat worse, (-) 2: A little bit worse, (-) 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same), (+) 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same), (+) 2: A little but better, (+) 3: Somewhat better, (+) 4: Moderately better, (+) 5: Quite a bit better, (+) 6: A great deal better, (+) 7: A very great deal better.

Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.

Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.

Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.

Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.

Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.

Question asked to military service members about their current duty status.

Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition. The reported values represent an average across all activities.

Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition. The reported values represent an average across all activities.

Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition. The reported values represent an average across all activities.

Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition. The reported values represent an average across all activities.

Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition. The reported values represent an average across all activities.

Individuals are asked to self-assess limited activities and measure them on a scale from 0-10 where '0' indicates they are able to perform the activity and '10' indicates that they are unable to perform the activity prior to their condition. The reported values represent an average across all activities.

The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is scored based on a cumulative score comprised of six testing conditions, each scored based the amount of errors committed during a testing condition. Each test has a maximum of 10 errors, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more committed mistakes and poorer balance.

The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is scored based on a cumulative score comprised of six testing conditions, each scored based the amount of errors committed during a testing condition. Each test has a maximum of 10 errors, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more committed mistakes and poorer balance.

The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is scored based on a cumulative score comprised of six testing conditions, each scored based the amount of errors committed during a testing condition. Each test has a maximum of 10 errors, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more committed mistakes and poorer balance.

The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is scored based on a cumulative score comprised of six testing conditions, each scored based the amount of errors committed during a testing condition. Each test has a maximum of 10 errors, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more committed mistakes and poorer balance.

The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is scored based on a cumulative score comprised of six testing conditions, each scored based the amount of errors committed during a testing condition. Each test has a maximum of 10 errors, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more committed mistakes and poorer balance.

Using wearable technology and slow motion capture camera, gait analysis will be collected. Post-run, cadence was calculated by testing administrators by reviewing the video captured to count the steps performed over the course of ten seconds. The count over the course of ten seconds was then multiplied by six to serve as a measurement for the unit of steps per minute using previously validated estimation methods.

Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.

Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.

Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.

Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.

Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.

Question asked to military service members about their ability to run 2 miles.

Using wearable technology and slow motion capture camera, gait analysis will be collected. Post-run, cadence was calculated by testing administrators by reviewing the video captured to count the steps performed over the course of ten seconds. The count over the course of ten seconds was then multiplied by six to serve as a measurement for the unit of steps per minute using previously validated estimation methods.

Using wearable technology and slow motion capture camera, gait analysis will be collected. Post-run, cadence was calculated by testing administrators by reviewing the video captured to count the steps performed over the course of ten seconds. The count over the course of ten seconds was then multiplied by six to serve as a measurement for the unit of steps per minute using previously validated estimation methods.

Using wearable technology and slow motion capture camera, gait analysis will be collected. Post-run, cadence was calculated by testing administrators by reviewing the video captured to count the steps performed over the course of ten seconds. The count over the course of ten seconds was then multiplied by six to serve as a measurement for the unit of steps per minute using previously validated estimation methods.

Using wearable technology and slow motion capture camera, gait analysis will be collected. Post-run, cadence was calculated by testing administrators by reviewing the video captured to count the steps performed over the course of ten seconds. The count over the course of ten seconds was then multiplied by six to serve as a measurement for the unit of steps per minute using previously validated estimation methods.

Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.

Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.

Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.

Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.

Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.

Question that asks the military service member of their ability to perform service specific job tasks.

Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run. Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain.

Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run. Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain

Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run. Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain.

Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run. Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain.

Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run. Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain.

Pain will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); An 11 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 to 10 with which participants are asked to rate their pain after completing a 2-mile run. Higher numbers approaching 10 indicate greater, more severe pain, whereas lower numbers approaching 0 indicate reduced or absence of pain.

Questionnaire asking the individual to rate their satisfaction of treatment by choosing one option from the following scale: (1): Exceptional, (2): Excellent, (3): Very Good, (4): Good, (5): Fair, (6): Poor, (7): Very Poor.

Questionnaire asking the individual to rate their satisfaction of treatment by choosing one option from the following scale: (1): Exceptional, (2): Excellent, (3): Very Good, (4): Good, (5): Fair, (6): Poor, (7): Very Poor.

Questionnaire asking the individual to rate their satisfaction of treatment by choosing one option from the following scale: (1): Exceptional, (2): Excellent, (3): Very Good, (4): Good, (5): Fair, (6): Poor, (7): Very Poor.

Questionnaire asking the individual to rate their satisfaction of treatment by choosing one option from the following scale: (1): Exceptional, (2): Excellent, (3): Very Good, (4): Good, (5): Fair, (6): Poor, (7): Very Poor.

Questionnaire asking the individual to rate their satisfaction of treatment by choosing one option from the following scale: (1): Exceptional, (2): Excellent, (3): Very Good, (4): Good, (5): Fair, (6): Poor, (7): Very Poor.