Efficacy and Tolerance Study of B-DYN Versus Conventional Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis on the Degree of Post-operative Functional Incapacity (BDYNCLIN)
NCT04407338 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 216
Last updated 2025-03-19
Summary
Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is an extremely common condition affecting more than 102 million people each year. It is a narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower back. It causes pain and even disorders of the lower limbs. When the symptoms get worse and the individual feels functional discomfort despite medical treatment, surgical intervention is recommended. Two surgical options are available: Rigid Stabilization Devices as conventional fusion with or without cage, or dynamic stabilization system as B-DYN device, this system is called "dynamic" because it allows the stabilization of the operated part while preserving a certain mobility.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of B-Dyn versus conventional bolted fusion (with or without cage) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) on the degree of postoperative functional incapacity. So the investigator's hypothesis is that the use of the B-DYN device in the treatment of DLS could lead to the maintenance of functional disability related to low back pain (maintenance of walking and mobility).
Another important point to be demonstrated in this study is the preservation of the mobility of the stage overlying the assembly performed by B-Dyn. Indeed, the continued degeneration of segments adjacent to lumbar vertebral fusions is a concern for surgeons For B-Dyn, which is a dynamic stabilization, the combination of rigid and flexible parts allows the mobility of the overlying stage to be preserved and could also lead to a decrease in adjacent syndrome in the long-term compared to the use of conventional fusion.
The duration of patient follow-up is 60 months. The inclusion period is 56 months to recruit the necessary number of subjects for the study (a total of 216 patients is expected).
Conditions
- Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
B-DYN
The surgical technique for placement of the B-Dyn device is performed under general anaesthesia. The procedure begins with the insertion of the first upper polyaxial screw which is screwed in with the polyaxial screwdriver. The use of the phantom (Trial 10) is necessary in order to position the second screw. Once the screws are positioned, the B-Dyn is taken between the jaws of the gripping forceps in order to insert it into the heads of the polyaxial screws. The movable rod of the B-Dyn is then placed in the head of the upper screw. The positioning mark of the fixed rod must be placed facing the operator and in the center of the lower screw head. Finally the cap of the lower polyaxial pedicle screw is tightened. A final tightening of the two plugs on the polyaxial pedicle screw heads is performed to fix the assembly.
- DEVICE
-
Conventional Bolted fusion (with or without cage)
The surgeon will complete his gesture by placing 2 screws in the upper vertebra and 2 screws in the lower vertebra; the screws will be connected to each other to stabilize the assembly. This type of surgery is done via posterior approach and under general anaesthesia.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cousin Biotech
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Quanta Medical
lead INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
-
Vincent POINTILLART, Professor · University Hospital, Bordeaux
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-01
- Completion
- 2029-11-01
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparaison of Interbody Bone Fusion Between Two Osteoinductive Bioactive Bone Substitutes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Arthrodesis in Degenerative Lumbar Disc Surgery in Adults
NCT07044206 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Lumbar Interbody Implant Study
NCT04418830 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
INDEPENDENCE Spacer for Lumbar Fusion
NCT02299323 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pilot Study of rhBMP-2/ACS/LT-CAGE® for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT01491373 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System vs. Decompression, Formerly vs. Posterolateral Fusion
NCT00627497 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Pilot Study to Assess Safety/Prelimary Effectiveness of Prefix in Subjects With Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) Undergoing Spine Fusion Surgery
NCT00798239 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
A Clinical Study of the Dynesys(R) Spinal System
NCT00759057 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Pivotal Study of rhBMP-2/ACS/LT-CAGE® Device for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT01491386 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Pivotal Study of rhBMP-2/ACS/INTER FIX™ Device for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT01491464 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Aspen Spinous Process Fixation System and PLIF Technique for the Treatment of Low Back Pain
NCT01918943 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Outcomes of Degenerative Disc Disease Patients Treated With an Anterior-Only Fusion Using InQu Bone Graft
NCT01746212 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Fibergraft Interbody Fusion Retrospective
NCT03898232 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Pivotal Study of rhBMP-2/ACS/LT-CAGE® Device for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT01491425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Patients With DDD Following TLIF With 3-D Printed Titanium Cage
NCT03018392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Interbody Systems: Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study
NCT04911257 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Pilot Study to Assess Safety/Preliminary Effectiveness of Prefix in Subjects With Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) Undergoing Spine Fusion Surgery
NCT00798902 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
A Study Comparing Fusion Rates of Two Lumbar Fusion Procedures
NCT01972256 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
NCT04073563 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study on the Clinical Use of a New Expandable OLIF Cage With Posterior Bone Grafting in Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT07028099 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Interbody Spacers With map3® Cellular Allogeneic Bone Graft in Anterior or Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT02628210 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Dynamic Stabilization Versus Lumbar Fusion in Treatment of Multilevel Lumbar Disc Degeneration Disease
NCT02385695 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Posterior Lateral Fusion (PLF) With Dynesys
NCT00791180 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Efficacy of the TransDiscal System Versus Medical Management in Treating Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT01263054 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT01455805 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Radiographic and Patient Outcomes Following Lumbar Spine Fusion Using Demineralized Bone Matrix (DBM) Mixed With Autograft
NCT00254852 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA