Trial Outcomes & Findings for SinuSonic for ETD and Facial Pain: Acoustic Vibration + Oscillating Expiratory Pressure (NCT NCT04404036)
NCT ID: NCT04404036
Last Updated: 2026-02-13
Results Overview
Five ETD symptoms (ear pressure, ear clogging, cracking/popping, muffled hearing, tinnitus) are each rated on a 10-cm line from 0 = "Not troublesome" to 10 = "Worst thinkable/troublesome." The total score is the sum of all five items (range 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
6 weeks (baseline to 6-week follow-up)
2026-02-13
Participant Flow
This results submission includes data only for the SinuSonic ETD cohort (Aim 2). Although the protocol planned additional cohorts (Aim 1 and Aim 3), those cohorts were not initiated, and no participants were enrolled in them. All results derive from the ETD cohort participants.
Participants were assigned only to the SinuSonic ETD cohort. Aims 1 and 3 were not initiated; therefore, no participants were enrolled or assigned to those cohorts. All available data-including exploratory symptom and pain outcomes-were collected exclusively from ETD cohort participants.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SinuSonic Device
All participants in the study were part of the SinuSonic ETD cohort; no other cohorts were opened to enrollment.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
SinuSonic Device
All participants in the study were part of the SinuSonic ETD cohort; no other cohorts were opened to enrollment.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
SinuSonic Device
n=29 Participants
Participants used the SinuSonic device twice daily for 3 minutes in the home setting. This is the only analyzed cohort for the completed study.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
24 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
5 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4 • n=41 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
28 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
2 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
23 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants • One participant did not complete the study and was excluded from analysis.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks (baseline to 6-week follow-up)Population: 29 participants completed baseline assessments and were included.
Five ETD symptoms (ear pressure, ear clogging, cracking/popping, muffled hearing, tinnitus) are each rated on a 10-cm line from 0 = "Not troublesome" to 10 = "Worst thinkable/troublesome." The total score is the sum of all five items (range 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SinuSonic Device
n=29 Participants
Participants used the SinuSonic device twice daily for 3 minutes for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Eustachian Tube Dysfunction (ETD) Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Total Score
|
59.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 weeksPopulation: 29 participants completed baseline assessments and were included.
The MPQ-SF includes 15 descriptors scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Total score ranges from 0-45. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SinuSonic Device
n=29 Participants
Participants used the SinuSonic device twice daily for 3 minutes for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
McGill Pain Questionnaire - Short Form (MPQ-SF) Total Score
|
12.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 weeksPopulation: 29 participants completed baseline assessments and were included.
Participants rate worst pain on an 11-point scale from 0 = "No pain" to 10 = "Worst pain imaginable." Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SinuSonic Device
n=29 Participants
Participants used the SinuSonic device twice daily for 3 minutes for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Modified Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (mBPI-sf): Worst Pain
|
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
Adverse Events
SinuSonic Device
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Shaun A. Nguyen, MD - Professor and Director of Clinical Research
Medical University of South Carolina
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place