Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Effect of Dupilumab on Lung Inflammation and Related Changes in Airway Volumes Detectable by Functional Respiratory Imaging in Patients With Moderate-severe Asthma (NCT NCT04400318)
NCT ID: NCT04400318
Last Updated: 2025-09-09
Results Overview
FeNO was analyzed using a NIOX instrument using a flow rate of 50 milliliters per second (mL/s). This assessment was conducted prior to spirometry and following a fast of greater than or equal to (≥1) hour. The test was performed after a wash out period of bronchodilators.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
109 participants
Week 24
2025-09-09
Participant Flow
A total of 317 participants were screened from 20 Jun 2020 to 06 Jan 2023 at 72 study sites in 14 countries of which 208 participants were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to not meeting the eligibility criteria.
A total of 109 participants were randomized in a ratio of 2:1 to receive dupilumab 300 milligrams (mg) or matching placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 24 weeks. Randomization was stratified by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) dose level (medium/high no less than 40% in 'high ICS' stratum) and region (Eastern Europe/Rest of the World \[ROW\]).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 milliliter (mL) SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
72
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
70
|
33
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 milliliter (mL) SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Not Related to Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic
|
0
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Only those participants with data available at baseline are reported.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=72 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=37 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Total
n=109 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.81 • n=72 Participants
|
49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.33 • n=37 Participants
|
50.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.62 • n=109 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
46 Participants
n=72 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=109 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
26 Participants
n=72 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=109 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=72 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=109 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
8 Participants
n=72 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=109 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=72 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=109 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=72 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=109 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
64 Participants
n=72 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=109 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=72 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=109 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=72 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=109 Participants
|
|
Untrimmed Distal Specific Airway Volumes ([s]iVaw) at Total Lung Capacity (TLC)
|
1.90526 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.954024 • n=69 Participants • Only those participants with data available at baseline are reported.
|
1.90562 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.161739 • n=35 Participants • Only those participants with data available at baseline are reported.
|
1.90539 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.022934 • n=104 Participants • Only those participants with data available at baseline are reported.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not).
FeNO was analyzed using a NIOX instrument using a flow rate of 50 milliliters per second (mL/s). This assessment was conducted prior to spirometry and following a fast of greater than or equal to (≥1) hour. The test was performed after a wash out period of bronchodilators.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=72 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=37 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) Less Than (<) 25 Parts Per Billion (Ppb) at Week 24
|
56.9 percentage of participants
|
10.8 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.
Specific airway volume \[(s)iVaw\] is the change of volume of the airways (in mL), taking into account the lung volume changes (in liter \[L\]) as well. It corresponds to the ratio between the airway volume (iVaw) and the lobar volume. This way the air volumes are normalized across participants and become specific. Untrimmed distal \[s\]iVaw at TLC was assessed based on 3-dimensional (D) rendering of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=68 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Untrimmed Distal Specific Airway Volumes ([s]iVaw) at Total Lung Capacity (TLC)
|
19.73 percent change
Standard Error 8.102
|
-2.04 percent change
Standard Error 11.538
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.
The mucus scoring system was derived, with very minor differences, from UCSF mucus score. The mucus score was calculated by counting the number of bronchopulmonary segments which contained 1 or more mucus plug, up to a maximum score of 18 corresponding to the 18 bronchopulmonary segments present in most people. In this system, a mucus plug is defined as a complete occlusion of the airway visible at TLC. Each bronchopulmonary segment is given a score of 1 (mucus plug\[s\] present) or 0 (mucus plug\[s\] absent). The segment scores of each lobe are summed to generate a total mucus score for both lungs, yielding a mucus score ranging from 0-18. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the date of first dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=68 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Global Lung Mucus Score (University of California, San Francisco [UCSF] Mucus Scoring)
|
-3.48 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.463
|
1.44 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.656
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.
iRaw is defined as the total pressure drop over an airway, divided by the flow rate through that airway. The specific airway resistance (s)iRaw is derived from iRaw by multiplying the airway resistance with the lobar volume. This way, the airway resistances are normalized across participants and become specific. Trimmed distal (\[s\]iRaw) at TLC was assessed using HRCT scan. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=68 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trimmed Distal Specific Airway Resistance ([s]iRaw) at TLC
|
36.85 percent change
Standard Error 22.562
|
90.30 percent change
Standard Error 32.541
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.
(s)iVaw is the change of volume of the airways (mL), taking into account the lung volume changes (in L) as well. It corresponds to the ratio between the airway volume (iVaw) and the lobar volume. Untrimmed distal \[s\]iVaw at FRC was assessed based on 3-D rendering of HRCT scans. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=70 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=35 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Untrimmed Distal Specific Airway Volumes ([s]iVaw) at Functional Residual Capacity (FRC)
|
225.91 percent change
Standard Error 92.250
|
-17.07 percent change
Standard Error 129.384
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.
iRaw is defined as the total pressure drop over an airway, divided by the flow rate through that airway. The specific airway resistance (s)iRaw is derived from iRaw by multiplying the airway resistance with the lobar volume. This way, the airway resistances are normalized across participants and become specific. Trimmed distal \[s\]iRaw at FRC was assessed using HRCT scan. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of the first dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=69 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=35 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trimmed Distal Specific Airway Resistance ([s]iRaw) at FRC
|
98.73 percent change
Standard Error 70.143
|
207.87 percent change
Standard Error 98.445
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.
The lung volume was determined from the HRCT scan at TLC, by identifying and grouping the voxels that represent the air in the lungs. The total lung volume along with the volume of each lobe individually was determined which allowed to pick up substantial regional physiological changes of the airways and the lobe volumes. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of first dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=68 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Global Lung Lobar Volumes (iVlobes) at TLC
|
-0.98 percent change
Standard Error 1.691
|
-3.74 percent change
Standard Error 2.401
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.
The IAD was assessed in the upper and lower lung using HRCT scan. By segmenting the lobes at FRC and TLC for each participant, the participant-specific airflow distribution can be established by assessing lobar and volume expansion. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the date of the first dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=67 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in HRCT-Based Internal Airflow Distribution (IAD) for Each Lung Zone
Upper Lung
|
-0.61 percentage of IAD
Standard Error 0.803
|
-0.11 percentage of IAD
Standard Error 1.133
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in HRCT-Based Internal Airflow Distribution (IAD) for Each Lung Zone
Lower Lung
|
0.61 percentage of IAD
Standard Error 0.803
|
0.11 percentage of IAD
Standard Error 1.133
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.
Blood vessel density can be considered a surrogate for perfusion, hence image-based perfusion (IQ) is calculated by blood vessel density at TLC multiplied by image-based volume at TLC. Image-based ventilation (IV) is calculated by the imaged volume at TLC subtracted from the image-based volume at FRC. The ventilation/perfusion ratio IV/Q is then the ratio IV/IQ. The iV/Q was assessed in the upper and lower lung using HRCT scan at TLC. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of the first dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=67 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=34 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Image-Based Ventilation/Perfusion (iV/Q) at TLC for Each Lung Zone
Upper Lung
|
1.42 Ratio
Standard Error 0.538
|
-0.45 Ratio
Standard Error 0.758
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Image-Based Ventilation/Perfusion (iV/Q) at TLC for Each Lung Zone
Lower Lung
|
1.75 Ratio
Standard Error 0.579
|
-0.91 Ratio
Standard Error 0.817
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not).
FeNO was analyzed using a NIOX instrument using a flow rate of 50 mL/s. This assessment was conducted prior to spirometry and following a fast of ≥1 hour. The test was performed after a wash out period of bronchodilators. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the day of the first dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=72 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=37 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in FeNO
|
-35.49 parts per billion
Standard Error 2.440
|
-12.56 parts per billion
Standard Error 3.444
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not).
FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration. Lung function parameters: pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1 were measured by spirometry before IMP administration. Spirometry was performed after a wash out period of bronchodilators. Post-BD FEV1 was measured within 30 minutes after short-acting beta-2 agonists (2 to up to 4 puffs of albuterol/salbutamol) administration. Baseline was defined as the last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including the date of the first dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=72 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=37 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Pre-Bronchodilator and Post-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1
|
0.655 liter
Standard Error 0.0637
|
0.274 liter
Standard Error 0.0885
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Pre-Bronchodilator and Post-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
Post-Bronchodilator FEV1
|
0.468 liter
Standard Error 0.0661
|
0.151 liter
Standard Error 0.0928
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of randomized participants (participants with a study intervention kit number allocated and recorded in the IVRS/IWRS database, regardless of whether the study intervention kit was used or not). Only participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.
The ACQ-7 comprises of 7 items:first 5 items assess most common asthma symptoms: 1. frequency in past week awoken by asthma during the night; 2. severity of asthma symptoms in the morning; 3. limitation of daily activities due to asthma; 4. shortness of breath due to asthma; and 5. wheeze; plus questions 6. short-acting bronchodilator use; and 7. FEV1 (pre-bronchodilator use, % and % predicted use).Participants are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week and to respond to the symptom questions on a 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6=maximum impairment).Clinic staff scores the FEV1% predicted on a 7-point scale.A global score is calculated: the questions are equally weighted, and the overall ACQ-7 score is the mean of the 7 questions and, therefore, between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled).Higher score indicates lower asthma control. Baseline=last available valid (non-missing) value up to and including day of the first dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=70 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=36 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 7 Item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7)
|
-1.36 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.101
|
-0.62 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.143
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)Population: The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 injection of IMP.
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period, defined as the time from the first administration of the IMP (on Day 1) to the last administration of the IMP + 98 days and up to the end of the study follow-up. Serious adverse events (SAE): AE that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. AESI: AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor is required.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=72 Participants
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=37 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Any TEAE
|
31 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Any TESAE
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Any AESI
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=72 participants at risk
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=37 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Eosinophilia
|
1.4%
1/72 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis
|
1.4%
1/72 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Facial Bones Fracture
|
1.4%
1/72 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Soft Tissue Injury
|
1.4%
1/72 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
0.00%
0/37 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/72 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Dupilumab 300 mg Q2W
n=72 participants at risk
Participants received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg as 2 SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
Placebo
n=37 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to dupilumab as 2 x 2 mL SC injections on Day 1, followed by a single SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks along with a stable dose of medium to high ICS dose in combination with a second controller medication +/- a third controller.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/72 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Reaction
|
5.6%
4/72 • Number of events 10 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
9.7%
7/72 • Number of events 7 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/72 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.9%
5/72 • Number of events 6 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
5.6%
4/72 • Number of events 4 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
24.3%
9/37 • Number of events 11 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
1.4%
1/72 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep Apnoea Syndrome
|
0.00%
0/72 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (up to 36 weeks)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set.
|
Additional Information
Trial Transparency Team
Sanofi aventis recherche & développement
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Sponsor supports publication of clinical trial results but may request that investigators temporarily delay or alter publications in order to protect proprietary information. The Sponsor may also require that the results of multicenter studies be published only in their entirety and not as individual site data.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER