MedTrace Logo

Comparative Evaluation of Two PRF Formulations on Quality of Life and Healing of Apicomarginal Defects

NCT04396743 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32

Last updated 2020-05-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Healing of apicomarginal defects using 2 different formulations of PRF i.e PRF -high and PRF-medium will be assessed and compared using 2D and 3D criteria. Also, in vitro evaluation of the PRF formulations and quality of life will be compared between the two groups.

Conditions

  • Apico Marginal Defects

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Periapical surgery with use of prf-high clot and membrane

Periapical surgery will be done followed by placement of prf-high clot into the defect and membrane over the defect before closure of the flap.

PROCEDURE

Periapical surgery with use of prf-medium clot and membrane

Periapical surgery will be done followed by placement of prf-medium clot in the defect and membrane over the defect before closure of the flap.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-12-11
Primary Completion
2021-04-11
Completion
2021-04-11

Countries

  • India

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04396743 on ClinicalTrials.gov