Trial Outcomes & Findings for Families Together: Intervention for Reunified Families (NCT NCT04382677)
NCT ID: NCT04382677
Last Updated: 2026-04-14
Results Overview
Parent sensitivity is measured by the Nursing Child Assessment Teaching Scale (NCATS; Barnard 1994), a videotaped interaction to assess caregiver sensitivity, stimulation of the child, and emotional responsiveness during interaction. The score is the sum of 37 items, ranging from 0 to 37; higher scores indicate greater parental sensitivity.
COMPLETED
NA
264 participants
6 months post intervention (Time 3) -- approximately 12 months after Baseline (Time 1)
2026-04-14
Participant Flow
Recruitment took place between 12/2017 and 5/2023 in collaboration with the Washington State Department of Children, Youth, \& Families (DCYF). A DCYF study liaison mailed opt-out letters to birth parents recently reunified with a child aged 1-5 years after a foster care placement (open case in Trial Return Home status), living in the greater Seattle, WA area. Parents who did not opt out were contacted by a study recruiter, screened for eligibility, and enrolled in the study.
Of the eligible parent-child dyads (N=427), 264 dyads enrolled:1 parent and 1 child each equating to 528 total parent and child participants.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
The PFR program designed for birth parents being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Observation
STARTED
|
132
|
132
|
|
Baseline Observation
COMPLETED
|
132
|
132
|
|
Baseline Observation
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Intervention
STARTED
|
109
|
127
|
|
Intervention
COMPLETED
|
68
|
104
|
|
Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
41
|
23
|
|
Post-intervention Follow-up
STARTED
|
118
|
117
|
|
Post-intervention Follow-up
COMPLETED
|
93
|
98
|
|
Post-intervention Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
|
25
|
19
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
The PFR program designed for birth parents being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-intervention Follow-up
Lost to Follow-up
|
18
|
9
|
|
Intervention
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
1
|
|
Intervention
Busy, competing demands
|
19
|
0
|
|
Intervention
Lost to Follow-up
|
10
|
4
|
|
Intervention
Became ineligible-out of area, not parenting
|
4
|
5
|
|
Intervention
Dropped due to COVID-19 pause
|
6
|
13
|
|
Post-intervention Follow-up
Death
|
0
|
1
|
|
Post-intervention Follow-up
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
|
Post-intervention Follow-up
Became ineligible-not parenting
|
7
|
8
|
Baseline Characteristics
Data reported for parents and children separately
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
n=264 Participants
The PFR program designed for birth parents being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
n=264 Participants
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
Total
n=528 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
Parents
|
30.99 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.663 • n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
32.98 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.463 • n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
31.99 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.162 • n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Age, Continuous
Children
|
2.538 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.378 • n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
2.545 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.405 • n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
2.542 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.389 • n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Parents · Female
|
107 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
109 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
216 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Parents · Male
|
25 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
23 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
48 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Children · Female
|
62 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
64 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
126 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Children · Male
|
70 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
68 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
138 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
6 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
7 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
13 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Asian
|
1 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
1 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
3 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
2 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
5 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Black or African American
|
14 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
17 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
31 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · White
|
83 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
85 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
168 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · More than one race
|
25 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
21 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
46 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
4 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
5 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
9 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
2 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
1 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
3 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Black or African American
|
14 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
11 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
25 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · White
|
70 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
72 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
142 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · More than one race
|
42 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
43 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
85 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Hispanic or Latino
|
16 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
12 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
28 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
116 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
120 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
236 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children · Hispanic or Latino
|
26 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
25 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
51 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
106 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
107 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
213 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=132 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
0 Participants
n=264 Participants • Data reported for parents and children separately
|
|
Dyad enrolled relative to COVID-19 pandemic
Enrolled prior to COVID-19
|
85 dyads
n=132 Participants • Data reported for the dyad as the analysis population
|
83 dyads
n=132 Participants • Data reported for the dyad as the analysis population
|
168 dyads
n=264 Participants • Data reported for the dyad as the analysis population
|
|
Dyad enrolled relative to COVID-19 pandemic
Enrolled after COVID-19 pause
|
47 dyads
n=132 Participants • Data reported for the dyad as the analysis population
|
49 dyads
n=132 Participants • Data reported for the dyad as the analysis population
|
96 dyads
n=264 Participants • Data reported for the dyad as the analysis population
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 months post enrollment in the studyPopulation: Outcome measure assessed only in children who were not dropped due to COVID-19 pandemic. N for this outcome is 240 children.
Official child welfare administrative records indicating whether the child in they dyad was removed from the birth parent home. 18 months post enrollment is approximately 1 year post intervention for those who completed interventions on schedule
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
n=121 Participants
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
n=119 Participants
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Welfare Services Removal From Birth Parent Home
|
12 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post intervention (Time 2) -- approximately 6 months after Baseline (Time 1)Population: Outcome measure assessed only in parents, number of participants analyzed reflect total parent participants assessed for this outcome. Technically, the models used full information maximum likelihood estimation and included cases with partial data (i.e., baseline scores but no follow-up scores) and help reduce bias due to attrition that is associated with nonmissing data on model covariates. The effective sample size, however, is the number of cases who with nonmissing data for follow-up scores.
Parent sensitivity is measured by the Nursing Child Assessment Teaching Scale (NCATS; Barnard 1994), a videotaped interaction to assess caregiver sensitivity, stimulation of the child, and emotional responsiveness during interaction. The score is the sum of 37 items, ranging from 0 to 37; higher scores indicate greater parental sensitivity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
n=119 Participants
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
n=121 Participants
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Parental Sensitivity (Video Recorded Observations Coded by Coders Blind to Intervention)
Baseline
|
27.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.56
|
27.91 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.70
|
|
Change in Parental Sensitivity (Video Recorded Observations Coded by Coders Blind to Intervention)
Post-intervention follow-up
|
28.44 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.59
|
28.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.36
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months post intervention (Time 3) -- approximately 12 months after Baseline (Time 1)Population: Outcome measure assessed only in parents, number of participants analyzed reflect total parent participants assessed for this outcome. The models used full information maximum likelihood estimation and included cases with partial data (i.e., baseline scores but no follow-up scores) and help reduce bias due to attrition that is associated with nonmissing data on model covariates. The effective sample size, however, is the number of cases with nonmissing data for follow-up scores.
Parent sensitivity is measured by the Nursing Child Assessment Teaching Scale (NCATS; Barnard 1994), a videotaped interaction to assess caregiver sensitivity, stimulation of the child, and emotional responsiveness during interaction. The score is the sum of 37 items, ranging from 0 to 37; higher scores indicate greater parental sensitivity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
n=119 Participants
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
n=121 Participants
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Parental Sensitivity (Video Recorded Observations Coded by Coders Blind to Intervention)
Baseline
|
27.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.56
|
27.91 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.70
|
|
Change in Parental Sensitivity (Video Recorded Observations Coded by Coders Blind to Intervention)
6-month follow-up
|
28.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.45
|
27.94 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.21
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post intervention (Time 2) -- approximately 6 months after Baseline (Time 1)Population: Outcome measure assessed only in parents, number of participants analyzed reflect total parent participants assessed for this outcome. The models used full information maximum likelihood estimation and included cases with partial data (i.e., baseline scores but no follow-up scores) and help reduce bias due to attrition that is associated with nonmissing data on model covariates. The effective sample size, however, is the number of cases with nonmissing data for follow-up scores.
14-item Likert-scale questionnaire developed by the study, "Raising a Child," is a measure of caregivers' knowledge of children's social-emotional needs and developmentally appropriate expectations. Items are scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 4 points. The Raising a Child scale score is the sum of the 14 items; the range is 14 to 56 with higher scores indicating greater parenting knowledge (better outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
n=119 Participants
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
n=121 Participants
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Parenting Knowledge of Child Development
Baseline
|
44.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.92
|
45.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.04
|
|
Change in Parenting Knowledge of Child Development
Post-intervention follow-up
|
44.61 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.35
|
45.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.13
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months post intervention (Time 3) -- approximately 12 months after Baseline (Time 1)Population: Outcome measure assessed only in parents, number of participants analyzed reflect total parent participants assessed for this outcome. The models used full information maximum likelihood estimation and included cases with partial data (i.e., baseline scores but no follow-up scores) and help reduce bias due to attrition that is associated with nonmissing data on model covariates. The effective sample size, however, is the number of cases with nonmissing data for follow-up scores.
14-item Likert-scale questionnaire developed by the study, "Raising a Child," is a measure of caregivers' knowledge of children's social-emotional needs and developmentally appropriate expectations. Items are scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 4 points. The Raising a Child scale score is the sum of the 14 items; the range is 14 to 56 with higher scores indicating greater parenting knowledge (better outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
n=119 Participants
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
n=121 Participants
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Parenting Knowledge of Child Development
Baseline
|
44.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.92
|
45.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.04
|
|
Change in Parenting Knowledge of Child Development
6-month follow-up
|
43.46 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.48
|
44.52 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post intervention (Time 2) -- approximately 6 months after Baseline (Time 1)Population: Outcome measure assessed only in parent's report of child, number of participants analyzed reflect total parent participants assessed for this outcome. The models used full information maximum likelihood estimation and included cases with partial data (i.e., baseline scores but no follow-up scores) and help reduce bias due to attrition that is associated with nonmissing data on model covariates. The effective sample size, however, is the number of cases with nonmissing data for follow-up scores.
Child externalizing behavioral problems will be measured based on parent report using the Child Behavior Check List (CBCL: Achenbach \& Rescorla, 2000). The externalizing scale has 24 items; raw scores can range from 0 to 48 with higher scores indicating more externalizing behaviors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
n=119 Participants
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
n=121 Participants
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Child Externalizing Problem Behavior
Baseline
|
17.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.38
|
17.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.53
|
|
Change in Child Externalizing Problem Behavior
Post intervention
|
17.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.86
|
17.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months post intervention (Time 3) -- approximately 12 months after Baseline (Time 1)Population: Outcome measure assessed only in parent's report of child, number of participants analyzed reflect total parent participants assessed for this outcome. The models used full information maximum likelihood estimation and included cases with partial data (i.e., baseline scores but no follow-up scores) and help reduce bias due to attrition that is associated with nonmissing data on model covariates. The effective sample size, however, is the number of cases with nonmissing data for follow-up scores.
Child externalizing behavioral problems will be measured based on parent report using the Child Behavior Check List (CBCL: Achenbach \& Rescorla, 2000). The externalizing scale has 24 items; raw scores can range from 0 to 48 with higher scores indicating more externalizing behaviors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
n=119 Participants
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
n=121 Participants
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Child Externalizing Problem Behavior
Baseline
|
17.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.38
|
17.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.53
|
|
Change in Child Externalizing Problem Behavior
6-month follow-up
|
19.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.92
|
17.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post intervention (Time 2) -- approximately 6 months after Baseline (Time 1)Population: Outcome measure assessed only in parent's report of child, number of participants analyzed reflect total parent participants assessed for this outcome. The models used full information maximum likelihood estimation and included cases with partial data (i.e., baseline scores but no follow-up scores) and help reduce bias due to attrition that is associated with nonmissing data on model covariates. The effective sample size, however, is the number of cases with nonmissing data for follow-up scores.
Child internalizing behavioral problems will be measured based on parent report using the Child Behavior Check List (CBCL: Achenbach \& Rescorla, 2000). The internalizing scale has 36 items; raw scores can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores indicating more internalizing behaviors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
n=119 Participants
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
n=121 Participants
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Child Internalizing Problem Behavior
Baseline
|
10.87 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.68
|
11.68 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.46
|
|
Change in Child Internalizing Problem Behavior
Post-intervention follow-up
|
10.46 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.09
|
12.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months post intervention (Time 3) -- approximately 12 months after Baseline (Time 1)Population: Outcome measure assessed only in parent's report of child, number of participants analyzed reflect total parent participants assessed for this outcome. The models used full information maximum likelihood estimation and included cases with partial data (i.e., baseline scores but no follow-up scores) and help reduce bias due to attrition that is associated with nonmissing data on model covariates. The effective sample size, however, is the number of cases with nonmissing data for follow-up scores.
Child internalizing behavioral problems will be measured based on parent report using the Child Behavior Check List (CBCL: Achenbach \& Rescorla, 2000). The internalizing scale has 36 items; raw scores can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores indicating more internalizing behaviors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships
n=119 Participants
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral
n=121 Participants
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Child Internalizing Problem Behavior
Baseline
|
10.87 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.68
|
11.68 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.46
|
|
Change in Child Internalizing Problem Behavior
6-month follow-up
|
11.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.52
|
11.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.22
|
Adverse Events
Promoting First Relationships - Parents
Promoting First Relationships - Children
Resource & Referral - Parents
Resource & Referral - Children
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships - Parents
n=132 participants at risk
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Promoting First Relationships - Children
n=132 participants at risk
The PFR program designed for birth families being reunited after foster care placement consists of a manualized 12-session intervention delivered in the home by trained providers.
|
Resource & Referral - Parents
n=132 participants at risk
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
Resource & Referral - Children
n=132 participants at risk
The service consists of a needs assessment conducted by phone, followed by a personalized resource packet and referrals, and 3 monthly check-in phone calls.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/132 • From enrollment until end of 6-month post-intervention follow-up
All serious adverse events are reported regardless of relatedness to the study intervention. Both groups received positive services and no physical/medical intervention. No one was at risk for a serious adverse event or mortality from this behavioral positive parenting program. In attempting to locate a parent for the final data collection, we found their name listed as deceased in vital records. Data represent individual parents and children enrolled as dyads.
|
0.00%
0/132 • From enrollment until end of 6-month post-intervention follow-up
All serious adverse events are reported regardless of relatedness to the study intervention. Both groups received positive services and no physical/medical intervention. No one was at risk for a serious adverse event or mortality from this behavioral positive parenting program. In attempting to locate a parent for the final data collection, we found their name listed as deceased in vital records. Data represent individual parents and children enrolled as dyads.
|
0.76%
1/132 • From enrollment until end of 6-month post-intervention follow-up
All serious adverse events are reported regardless of relatedness to the study intervention. Both groups received positive services and no physical/medical intervention. No one was at risk for a serious adverse event or mortality from this behavioral positive parenting program. In attempting to locate a parent for the final data collection, we found their name listed as deceased in vital records. Data represent individual parents and children enrolled as dyads.
|
0.00%
0/132 • From enrollment until end of 6-month post-intervention follow-up
All serious adverse events are reported regardless of relatedness to the study intervention. Both groups received positive services and no physical/medical intervention. No one was at risk for a serious adverse event or mortality from this behavioral positive parenting program. In attempting to locate a parent for the final data collection, we found their name listed as deceased in vital records. Data represent individual parents and children enrolled as dyads.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Monica L. Oxford, Executive Director, Barnard Center for Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health
University of Washington
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place