Examining and Comparing the Temporal Changes and Results of Cosmetic, Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction Achieved With Immediate and Delayed-immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Procedures and Contralateral Symmetrization Techniques

NCT04356235 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 528

Last updated 2020-04-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a response-adaptive (RAR) prospective randomized study with a long-term follow-up and the aim of this clinical study is to measure with qualitative and quantitative indicators the changes in cosmetic results, quality of life and patient satisfaction after breast reconstructive surgery with silicone implant (following SSM, ASM or NSM mastectomy) and symmetrization (mastopexy and/or silicone implant and/or Ultrapro mesh sling technique) over time.

According to the hypothesis of the study, the results of implant-based breast reconstruction and symmetrization following advanced postmastectomy techniques significantly decrease over time and later results limited patient satisfaction rate.

This is mainly due to the fact that over time, the natural breast differs from the reconstructed breast with silicone implant. Because of the different biological properties (gravity results ptosis on breast with mastopexy, significant volume increasement of the breast with mastopexy due to endocrine therapy, gradually progressive capsular contracture on the tumorous side, nipple flattening, nipple tattoo fading etc.) the two sides change differently resulting in significant asymmetry and consequently could lead to decreased patient satisfaction.

The high degree of asymmetry over time (which can be similar to the difference between the result of a simple mastectomy and natural breast (control group)), may indicates additional surgeries or usage of medical devices, putting a financial burden on the patient and the health system. On the other hand, the symmetry can be achieved with bilateral skin-sparing mastectomies and implant-based immediate or delayed-immediate reconstructions is clearly better and change less with time. The mastectomy of the contralateral disease-free side is considered as an unreasonable burden for moderate risk patients.

The information such as the need for multiple surgeries, change in symmetry over time etc., should be an important part of the professional decision-making mechanism and the surgeon should inform the patient during the primer surgery. Nowadays due to the lack of evidence-based knowledge, it is not part of the patient's information and surgical planning internationally. Planning breast units, attention, capacity and financial resources must also be provided to meet the long-term needs of patients who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Simple mastectomy with an external prosthesis can be an alternative for patients with intolerable degree of asymmetry or on the contrary, the results may justify the need for bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction even in the absence of high oncological risk and for purely symmetrical and cosmetic reasons.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

A: expander-silicone implant exchange and contralateral symmetrization with mastopexy and if needed with volume reduction

expander-silicone implant exchange and contralateral symmetrization with mastopexy and if needed with volume reduction

PROCEDURE

B: expander-silicone implant exchange with contralateral symmetrization with mastopexy and Ultrapro sling

expander-silicone implant exchange with contralateral symmetrization with mastopexy and Ultrapro sling

PROCEDURE

C: expander-silicone implant exchange and contralateral symmetrization with mastopexy and silicone implant augmentation

expander-silicone implant exchange and contralateral symmetrization with mastopexy and silicone implant augmentation

PROCEDURE

D: expander-silicone implant exchange and contralateral symmetrization with mastopexy and Utrapro sling and silicone implant augmentation

expander-silicone implant exchange and contralateral symmetrization with mastopexy and Utrapro sling and silicone implant augmentation

PROCEDURE

E: unilateral simple mastectomy

unilateral simple mastectomy

PROCEDURE

F: after bilateral SSM, ASM, NSM, expander-implant exchange

after bilateral SSM, ASM, NSM, expander-implant exchange

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Institute of Oncology, Hungary

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-04-27
Primary Completion
2022-04-10
Completion
2027-04-10

Countries

  • Hungary

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04356235 on ClinicalTrials.gov