Evaluation and Comparison of Efficacy Between Extracorporeal Magnetic Innervation and High-intensity Kegel Exercise Regimen in Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Female

NCT04307680 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2020-08-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled study is to evaluate and compare efficacy between the most available conservative treatment (magnetic stimulation and Kegel exercise) for stress urinary incontinence in Croatia. We will assess quality-of-life, patient global improvement, and vaginal pressure measured with perineometer in three different time points: at the enrollment, after 8 weeks of treatment and 3 months after the both treatments are done.

Conditions

  • Stress Urinary Incontinence

Interventions

DEVICE

Peritron perineometer

Perineometry will be used to assess quality of each observed treatment modality.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Zagreb

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-08-02
Primary Completion
2021-01-02
Completion
2021-01-10

Countries

  • Croatia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04307680 on ClinicalTrials.gov