Trial Outcomes & Findings for Bridging the Childhood Epilepsy Treatment Gap in Africa (NCT NCT04290975)
NCT ID: NCT04290975
Last Updated: 2026-02-20
Results Overview
Percentage of children in each arm of the study who were seizure-free for 6 months, or longer, measured specifically at 24 months after enrollment. Physicians with expertise in epilepsy, blinded as to study arm, utilized review of seizure diaries maintained by parents plus medical history, to determine whether each child had been seizure free for six months, or longer, 24 months after enrollment in the cluster RCT.
COMPLETED
NA
1672 participants
Outcome measured 18 months to 24 months after enrollment
2026-02-20
Participant Flow
June 15, 2020 - Sept. 9, 2021, mothers of 41,623 children in the study area consented to their children being screened for epilepsy. Of 1852 children who screened positive for epilepsy, 1764 children (TSC=879 in 30 clusters; EUC=885 in 30 clusters) were initially diagnosed with epilepsy; 1672 children with a final diagnosis of epilepsy (TSC=846 in 30 clusters; EUC=826 in 30 clusters) enrolled in the epilepsy outcomes cluster RCT. Neither mothers nor CHWs were considered enrolled in the RCT.
Children who screened positive for epilepsy were assigned to a study arm (TSC or EUC) based upon their home address, and whether the participating PHC (cluster) closest to their home was randomly assigned to TSC or EUC. Among children with positive epilepsy screens, those who lived in a TSC area were referred to the PHC for diagnosis and treatment by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the task-shifted protocol; those in EUC areas were referred to physicians for diagnosis and treatment.
Unit of analysis: Clusters (Primary Healthcare Centers)
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty (30) clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty (30) clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
846 30
|
826 30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
763 30
|
724 30
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
83 0
|
102 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty (30) clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty (30) clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
50
|
54
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
23
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
10
|
19
|
Baseline Characteristics
Bridging the Childhood Epilepsy Treatment Gap in Africa
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Task-shifted Arm
n=846 Participants
In the task-shifted care arm (TSC), all children will be prescribed anti-seizure medication and receive follow-up care from a community health worker (CHW), with a physician consult available to the CHW as needed.
Task-shifting epilepsy care to epilepsy-trained community health workers (CHWs): Children with previously untreated epilepsy, identified via community-based screening and diagnositic evaluations, receive epilepsy care (including anti-seizure medication management) from epilepsy-trained community health workers (CHWs).
|
Enhanced Usual Care Arm
n=826 Participants
In the enhanced usual care arm (EUC), all children will be prescribed anti-seizure medication and receive follow-up care from a physician. A CHW collecting standardized data will mirror the intervention arm. In addition, the CHW will enhance the physician care by assisting parents navigate the healthcare system.
Enhanced usual care for epilepsy (EUC): Children with previously untreated epilepsy, identified via community-based screening and diagnostic evaluations, receive epilepsy care by physicians, as routinely done in Nigeria. The usual physician care is enhanced by community health workers (CHWs), who do not participate in the child's epilepsy care, but who help families navigate the healthcare system.
|
Total
n=1672 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
846 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
826 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
1672 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
306 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
289 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
595 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
540 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
537 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
1077 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Hausa
|
755 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
774 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
1529 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Fulani
|
51 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Yoruba
|
7 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Igbo
|
2 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Other
|
31 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Nigeria
|
846 participants
n=14 Participants
|
826 participants
n=14 Participants
|
1672 participants
n=29 Participants
|
|
Mean Baseline Seizures per month
|
20.6 Number of Seizures per Month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3 • n=14 Participants
|
18.8 Number of Seizures per Month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7 • n=14 Participants
|
19.7 Number of Seizures per Month
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.0 • n=29 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Outcome measured 18 months to 24 months after enrollmentPopulation: Enrolled children at 24-month following enrollment follow-up visit with blinded physicians.
Percentage of children in each arm of the study who were seizure-free for 6 months, or longer, measured specifically at 24 months after enrollment. Physicians with expertise in epilepsy, blinded as to study arm, utilized review of seizure diaries maintained by parents plus medical history, to determine whether each child had been seizure free for six months, or longer, 24 months after enrollment in the cluster RCT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=846 Participants
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=826 Participants
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Seizure-free for 6 Months, or Longer, Measured at 24 Months After Enrollment
|
371 Participants
|
299 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Outcome measured 18 months to 24 months after enrollmentPopulation: Outcome variance estimates adjusted for cluster correlation. At 24 months the secondary outcome is captured for 1488 of 1672 randomized, eligible study subjects. 101/826 (12.2%) EUC patients and 83/846 (9.8%) TSC patients are missing this secondary outcome at 24 months, as blinded physicians in some instances were unable to determine the percentage decrease in seizure frequency.
75% or greater reduction in seizure frequency (including seizure freedom) for 6 months or longer was determined by the blinded physician at the 24-month follow-up visit, compared to seizure frequency reported at time of enrollment. Outcome variance estimates were adjusted for cluster correlation. At 24 months this secondary outcome is captured for 1488 of 1672 randomized, eligible patients. 101/826 (12.2%) EUC patients and 83/846 (9.8%) TSC patients are missing the secondary outcome at 24 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=763 Participants
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=725 Participants
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
75% or Greater Reduction in Seizure Frequency as Determined by the Blinded Physician at 24 Months Follow-up Visit
|
636 Participants
|
531 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Outcome measured from prescription of the first anti-seizure medication during 24 months after enrollmentPercentage of children seizure-free for 6 months or longer in response to the first anti-epileptic drug prescribed, as measured by questions in standardized case report forms completed by physicians with epilepsy expertise, blinded as to the arm of the study. The blinded physicians will review a daily seizure log which indicates the occurrence and duration of each seizure, maintained by the parent/guardian, to facilitate the blinded physician evaluation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=488 Participants
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=440 Participants
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Seizure Freedom for Six Months or Longer in Response to the First Prescribed Anti-epileptic Drug
|
306 Participants
|
149 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Diagnostic accuracy measured at 1 month after enrollment.Population: Children who screened positive for epilepsy were assigned to the participating primary healthcare center (PHC) closest to their home address, either a PHC randomly assigned to the task-shifted care (TSC) arm or the enhanced usual physician epilepsy care (EUC) arm. The TSC study subjects had diagnostic evaluations by epilepsy-trained community health workers (CHWs), while the EUC study subjects were referred directly to physicians for diagnostic evaluations.
Diagnostic accuracy was determined based upon diagnosis of epilepsy (or"not epilepsy") by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, blinded as to study arm, or "blinded physicians". Non-inferiority of TSC arm diagnostic accuracy was declared if the lower limit for the ratio of the odds of being accurately diagnosed in the intervention (TSC) versus standard-of-care enhanced by community health workers (CHWs) helping parents navigate the healthcare system is below the odds ratio implied by a 10% absolute difference between study arms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=879 Participants
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=885 Participants
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic Accuracy
|
846 Participants
|
826 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Deaths measured for 25 months after enrollment.Population: This analysis was performed on the "Epilepsy Outcomes Population" or those diagnosed with epilepsy who were enrolled in the clinical trial.
Differences in mortality between study arms that cannot be explained by potential differences in disease severity
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=846 Participants
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=826 Participants
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mortality
|
50 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 months after enrollmentDifference in the number of children who experienced status epilepticus among children in both arms of the study, as measured by questions in standardized case report forms completed by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, who are blinded as to the arm of the study. The blinded physicians will review a daily seizure log which indicates estimated seizure duration for each seizure, maintained by the parent/guardian, to facilitate the blinded physician evaluation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=822 Participants
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=792 Participants
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Children Who Experienced Status Epilepticus
|
194 Participants
|
196 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Morbidity outcomes measured for 24 months after enrollment.Differences in morbidity, including neurodevelopmental morbidity (e.g., cerebral palsy), associated with epilepsy between study arms that emerged during the cRCT. Evaluations for CP were conducted during the 24-month follow-up period. Evaluations for wasting and for stunting were performed during follow-up visits of the 24-month study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=846 Participants
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=826 Participants
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Morbidity
Cerebral palsy
|
163 Participants
|
197 Participants
|
|
Morbidity
Wasting
|
162 Participants
|
184 Participants
|
|
Morbidity
Stunting
|
478 Participants
|
476 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 months after enrollmentPopulation: This analysis was performed upon the "Diagnostic Accuracy Population", among those children who screened positive for epilepsy by arm of the study.
Differences by study arm in cumulative number of children for whom EEGs were ordered
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=879 Participants
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=885 Participants
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Children for Whom an EEG Was Ordered
|
6 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 months after enrollment.Population: Task-shifted protocol violations by CHWs when providing epilepsy care for the 846 children assigned to TSC in 30 clusters.
Reported protocol violations among the study subjects receiving task-shifted epilepsy care from community health workers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=846 Participants
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Task-shifted Protocol Adherence
|
0 # protocol violations by CHWs
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 months after enrollment.6-month seizure-free intervals as determined by evaluations by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, blinded as to the arm of the study, at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months after enrollment. These blinded physicians with expertise in epilepsy will record seizure frequency (including seizure-freedom) on standardized case report forms, facilitated by blinded physician review of daily seizure logs maintained by parents/guardians that will indicate the specific dates and durations of all recorded seizures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=846 Participants
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=826 Participants
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Anytime 6-month Seizure-free Interval
|
448 Participants
|
440 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Outcome measured for 24 months after enrollment.Population: The seizure disability weights were determined for the epilepsy outcomes population of the BRIDGE cluster randomized clinical trial, with 846 children enrolled across 30 clusters in the Task-Shifted Epilepsy Care (TSC) arm, and 826 children enrolled across 30 clusters in the Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care (EUC) arm.
Seizure disability weights were determined for all enrolled children in each arm of the cluster randomized clinical trial (cRCT), beginning with information from enrollment, collected at each study visit, for the total duration of the study subject's enrollment in the study. For each follow-up visit, we computed average monthly seizure frequency over the reported study intervals. We time-weighted the disability weights across the 24-month study horizon for each enrolled child. The seizure disability weights are measured on a 0-1 scale, with "0" representing perfect health and "1" representing death. The seizure disability weight represents the severity of a non-fatal health state, with the lower score being more favorable.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=30 clusters
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=30 clusters
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Seizure Disability Weights
|
0.59 units on a scale, 0 to 1.
Interval 0.57 to 0.6
|
0.63 units on a scale, 0 to 1.
Interval 0.61 to 0.65
|
Adverse Events
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=846 participants at risk
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=826 participants at risk
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Malaria
|
0.59%
5/846 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.36%
3/826 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Stevens Johnson Syndrome
|
0.12%
1/846 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.00%
0/826 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Burns
|
0.35%
3/846 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.00%
0/826 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Typhoid Fever
|
0.00%
0/846 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.24%
2/826 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
General disorders
Drug Injestion
|
0.12%
1/846 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.00%
0/826 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Infections and infestations
meningitis
|
0.12%
1/846 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.00%
0/826 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Social circumstances
sexual assault
|
0.12%
1/846 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.00%
0/826 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fall resulting in fracture
|
0.00%
0/846 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.12%
1/826 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
General disorders
Hospitalization
|
3.1%
26/846 • Number of events 26 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
2.4%
20/826 • Number of events 20 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Task-shifted Epilepsy Care Arm (TSC)
n=846 participants at risk
In the task-shifted arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for untreated epilepsy underwent a diagnostic evaluation by an epilepsy-trained community health worker (CHW), supervised remotely by a physician with epilepsy expertise. Children who were diagnosed with untreated epilepsy after screening positive for epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) by the epilepsy-trained CHW according to a task-shifted protocol, and received follow-up care from an epilepsy-trained CHW, according to the specified task-shifted epilepsy protocol. These epilepsy-trained CHWs were supervised remotely by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, and were able to consult physicians with questions on an as-needed basis.
|
Enhanced Usual Epilepsy Care Arm (EUC)
n=826 participants at risk
In the enhanced usual care arm composed of thirty clusters, each cluster being a primary healthcare center (PHC) serving a local community, all children who screened positive for epilepsy were referred to a physician according to standard medical practice at the PHC. The diagnostic evaluation was performed by the physician in the community. Children diagnosed by the physician as having epilepsy were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM) and received follow-up care from a physician.
In addition to the usual epilepsy care provided by the physician, each child in the EUC arm was followed by an epilepsy-trained CHW, who followed the child's progress, helped the family navigate the healthcare system (including finding a physician). The usual physician care of epilepsy was enhanced by the support of a CHW, but epilepsy diagnosis and treatment was provided by a physician, not by the epilepsy-trained CHW.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Clinic evaluation for febrile illness
|
0.47%
4/846 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.00%
0/826 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
rash
|
0.12%
1/846 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.12%
1/826 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fracture
|
0.12%
1/846 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.12%
1/826 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hydropneumothorax of unknown likely infectious etiology
|
0.12%
1/846 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.00%
0/826 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Clinic visit for sudden increase in seizure frequency
|
0.00%
0/846 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.24%
2/826 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
burn
|
0.00%
0/846 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.24%
2/826 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
|
General disorders
accidental drug ingestion/overdose
|
0.00%
0/846 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
0.12%
1/826 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collection on study subjects from the time of enrollment until 1 month after completion of the 24-month follow-up visit for the cluster randomized clinical trial.
Standard NIH definitions for adverse events and classifying adverse events was taken from common data elements, incorporated into the study protocol and training of all study staff. The recording of adverse events was recorded in a systematic manner using REDCap-based case report forms at all scheduled study visits. Parents of study subjects were instructed to call their study community health worker to report adverse events between study visits.
|
Additional Information
Edwin Trevathan, MD, MPH, Amos Christie Chair in Global Health, Professor of Pediatrics & Neurology
Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place