Trial Outcomes & Findings for Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT) (NCT NCT04280705)
NCT ID: NCT04280705
Last Updated: 2022-03-14
Results Overview
Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1062 participants
Day 1 through Day 29
2022-03-14
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited at the participating sites from those admitted with symptoms of COVID-19 confirmed by PCR. Enrollment occurred between 21FEB2020 and 20APR2020.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
Placebo: The supplied placebo lyophilized formulation is identical in physical appearance to the active lyophilized formulation and contains the same inactive ingredients. Alternatively, a placebo of normal saline of equal volume may be given if there are limitations on matching placebo supplies.
|
Remdesivir
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
Remdesivir: Drug Remdesivir is a single diastereomer monophosphoramidate prodrug designed for the intracellular delivery of a modified adenine nucleoside analog GS-441524. In addition to the active ingredient, the lyophilized formulation of Remdesivir contains the following inactive ingredients: water for injection, sulfobutylether beta-cyclodextrin sodium (SBECD), and hydrochloric acid and/or sodium hydroxide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
521
|
541
|
|
Overall Study
Received Treatment
|
517
|
531
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
508
|
517
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
24
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
Placebo: The supplied placebo lyophilized formulation is identical in physical appearance to the active lyophilized formulation and contains the same inactive ingredients. Alternatively, a placebo of normal saline of equal volume may be given if there are limitations on matching placebo supplies.
|
Remdesivir
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
Remdesivir: Drug Remdesivir is a single diastereomer monophosphoramidate prodrug designed for the intracellular delivery of a modified adenine nucleoside analog GS-441524. In addition to the active ingredient, the lyophilized formulation of Remdesivir contains the following inactive ingredients: water for injection, sulfobutylether beta-cyclodextrin sodium (SBECD), and hydrochloric acid and/or sodium hydroxide.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Enrolled but not treated
|
4
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
7
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Transferred to another hospital
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Total
n=1062 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
373 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
382 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
755 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
324 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
354 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
678 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
197 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
187 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
384 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 • n=99 Participants
|
58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6 • n=107 Participants
|
58.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.0 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
189 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
189 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
378 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
332 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
352 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
684 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
116 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
250 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
32 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
56 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
135 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
117 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
109 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
226 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
287 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
279 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
566 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
55 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
121 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Greece
|
19 participants
n=99 Participants
|
14 participants
n=107 Participants
|
33 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
|
12 participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 participants
n=107 Participants
|
21 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
|
7 participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 participants
n=107 Participants
|
16 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
410 participants
n=99 Participants
|
427 participants
n=107 Participants
|
837 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
7 participants
n=99 Participants
|
8 participants
n=107 Participants
|
15 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
21 participants
n=99 Participants
|
22 participants
n=107 Participants
|
43 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
|
6 participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 participants
n=107 Participants
|
10 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
21 participants
n=99 Participants
|
25 participants
n=107 Participants
|
46 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
6 participants
n=99 Participants
|
7 participants
n=107 Participants
|
13 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
12 participants
n=99 Participants
|
16 participants
n=107 Participants
|
28 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Disease severity
Mild-to-moderate disease severity
|
50 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Disease severity
Severe disease severity
|
471 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
486 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
957 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Recovery
|
15 Days
Interval 13.0 to 18.0
|
10 Days
Interval 9.0 to 11.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Recovery by Race
Asian
|
12.0 Days
Interval 9.0 to 15.0
|
11.0 Days
Interval 9.0 to 15.0
|
|
Time to Recovery by Race
Black or African American
|
15.0 Days
Interval 10.0 to 21.0
|
10.0 Days
Interval 7.0 to 16.0
|
|
Time to Recovery by Race
White
|
15.0 Days
Interval 12.0 to 19.0
|
9.0 Days
Interval 8.0 to 12.0
|
|
Time to Recovery by Race
Other
|
24.0 Days
Interval 15.0 to
A large number of participants at the median estimate resulted in little variability at the 50th percentile and the methodology described by Klein and Moeschberger (1997) was unable to compute an upper confidence limit.
|
9.0 Days
Interval 6.0 to 14.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized and for whom Ethnicity was reported
Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=489 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=516 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Recovery by Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
15.0 Days
Interval 13.0 to 18.0
|
10.0 Days
Interval 8.0 to 12.0
|
|
Time to Recovery by Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
|
12.5 Days
Interval 9.0 to 22.0
|
10.0 Days
Interval 7.0 to 14.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale: 1) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 3) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Recovery by Sex
Female
|
15.0 Days
Interval 12.0 to 19.0
|
10.0 Days
Interval 8.0 to 13.0
|
|
Time to Recovery by Sex
Male
|
15.0 Days
Interval 12.0 to 19.0
|
9.0 Days
Interval 8.0 to 12.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate ALT was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=463 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=465 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT)
Day 3
|
14.3 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 88
|
2.9 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 31.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT)
Day 5
|
23.1 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 70.6
|
10.8 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 55.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT)
Day 11
|
27.7 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 89.8
|
3.4 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 48.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT)
Day 15
|
28.1 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 110.1
|
1.7 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 47.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT)
Day 29
|
-3.9 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 62.2
|
-6.8 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 43.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT)
Day 8
|
24.2 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 79.7
|
8.9 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 54.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate AST was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=438 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=445 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Transaminase (AST)
Day 3
|
13.7 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 90.7
|
-2.0 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 29.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Transaminase (AST)
Day 5
|
12.8 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 66.2
|
6.0 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 58.9
|
|
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Transaminase (AST)
Day 8
|
13.1 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 114.6
|
1.1 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 55.9
|
|
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Transaminase (AST)
Day 11
|
11.5 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 78.8
|
-0.3 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 51.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Transaminase (AST)
Day 15
|
4.2 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 73.0
|
-2.3 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 60.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Transaminase (AST)
Day 29
|
-18.4 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 47.2
|
-14.0 Units/Liter (U/L)
Standard Deviation 52.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate serum creatinine was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=475 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=482 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Creatinine
Day 3
|
0.037 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.517
|
0.038 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.569
|
|
Change From Baseline in Creatinine
Day 5
|
-0.695 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 17.552
|
0.075 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.762
|
|
Change From Baseline in Creatinine
Day 8
|
-0.882 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 19.637
|
0.158 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.951
|
|
Change From Baseline in Creatinine
Day 11
|
1.173 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 15.440
|
0.236 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.057
|
|
Change From Baseline in Creatinine
Day 15
|
-1.239 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 22.755
|
0.319 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 2.147
|
|
Change From Baseline in Creatinine
Day 29
|
-1.863 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 26.093
|
0.075 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.644
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate serum glucose was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=456 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=459 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Glucose
Day 3
|
-0.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 53.4
|
-3.0 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 49.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Glucose
Day 5
|
6.3 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 60.2
|
2.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 63.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Glucose
Day 8
|
2.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 73.3
|
3.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 68.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Glucose
Day 11
|
1.0 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 70.1
|
-0.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 77.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Glucose
Day 15
|
-2.8 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 64.4
|
-2.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 75.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Glucose
Day 29
|
-13.5 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 96.8
|
-11.7 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 75.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate hemoglobin was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=475 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=475 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Day 3
|
-0.52 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
-0.69 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 5.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Day 5
|
-0.83 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
-0.99 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 5.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Day 8
|
-1.22 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.42
|
-0.49 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 6.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Day 11
|
-1.66 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.67
|
-1.29 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Day 15
|
-1.51 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
-1.02 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 3.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Day 29
|
-1.02 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
-1.21 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
Standard Deviation 7.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate platelets was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=471 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=474 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Platelets
Day 3
|
39.3 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 60.0
|
46.0 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 62.6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Platelets
Day 5
|
76.5 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 100.5
|
90.1 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 99.9
|
|
Change From Baseline in Platelets
Day 8
|
111.8 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 137.4
|
130.8 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 128.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Platelets
Day 11
|
109.3 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 149.3
|
101.0 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 145.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Platelets
Day 15
|
96.5 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 154.2
|
71.1 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 133.3
|
|
Change From Baseline in Platelets
Day 29
|
32.7 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 124.2
|
39.6 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 107.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate PT was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=339 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=352 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Prothrombin Time (PT)
Day 3
|
-0.18 seconds
Standard Deviation 4.28
|
0.44 seconds
Standard Deviation 5.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Prothrombin Time (PT)
Day 5
|
-0.30 seconds
Standard Deviation 4.72
|
1.15 seconds
Standard Deviation 5.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in Prothrombin Time (PT)
Day 8
|
0.01 seconds
Standard Deviation 2.59
|
1.43 seconds
Standard Deviation 3.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Prothrombin Time (PT)
Day 11
|
0.86 seconds
Standard Deviation 7.85
|
1.88 seconds
Standard Deviation 5.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Prothrombin Time (PT)
Day 15
|
0.34 seconds
Standard Deviation 4.33
|
-0.03 seconds
Standard Deviation 4.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Prothrombin Time (PT)
Day 29
|
-0.28 seconds
Standard Deviation 3.20
|
-0.63 seconds
Standard Deviation 3.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate total bilirubin was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=451 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=456 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin
Day 3
|
0.08 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-0.04 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin
Day 5
|
0.58 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 4.13
|
-0.03 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin
Day 8
|
0.22 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
0.01 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin
Day 11
|
0.23 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 2.79
|
0.07 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin
Day 15
|
0.00 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
0.09 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin
Day 29
|
-0.17 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
-0.12 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate WBC was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=474 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=475 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
Day 3
|
18.691 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 424.837
|
-18.970 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 301.944
|
|
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
Day 5
|
9.886 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 566.175
|
-28.209 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 412.615
|
|
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
Day 8
|
27.223 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 479.095
|
-45.997 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 602.461
|
|
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
Day 11
|
1.967 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 16.042
|
-34.702 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 574.065
|
|
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
Day 15
|
56.311 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 620.551
|
-70.884 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 600.011
|
|
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count (WBC)
Day 29
|
-0.898 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 17.801
|
0.251 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 3.987
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate neutrophils was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=463 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=459 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Neutrophils
Day 3
|
9.429 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 260.345
|
-8.093 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 135.068
|
|
Change From Baseline in Neutrophils
Day 5
|
4.177 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 362.782
|
-15.067 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 216.532
|
|
Change From Baseline in Neutrophils
Day 8
|
17.916 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 305.321
|
-28.179 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 365.099
|
|
Change From Baseline in Neutrophils
Day 11
|
3.010 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 27.502
|
-21.773 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 354.025
|
|
Change From Baseline in Neutrophils
Day 15
|
36.024 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 389.093
|
-39.988 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 333.088
|
|
Change From Baseline in Neutrophils
Day 29
|
-1.269 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 7.160
|
-0.840 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 3.666
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate lymphocytes was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=463 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=459 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes
Day 5
|
4.064 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 141.580
|
-11.723 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 167.428
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes
Day 8
|
8.006 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 137.149
|
-15.455 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 194.111
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes
Day 3
|
5.883 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 118.740
|
-7.847 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 131.548
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes
Day 11
|
0.393 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 1.371
|
-12.016 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 183.060
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes
Day 15
|
14.793 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 159.583
|
-23.836 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 218.653
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes
Day 29
|
0.668 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 1.406
|
0.743 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.664
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate monocytes was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=463 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=458 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Monocytes
Day 3
|
2.448 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 41.304
|
-2.940 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 46.752
|
|
Change From Baseline in Monocytes
Day 5
|
1.498 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 57.686
|
-2.628 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 39.329
|
|
Change From Baseline in Monocytes
Day 8
|
2.324 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 36.626
|
-3.645 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 48.636
|
|
Change From Baseline in Monocytes
Day 11
|
0.383 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.744
|
-2.539 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 43.454
|
|
Change From Baseline in Monocytes
Day 15
|
6.475 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 69.019
|
-8.738 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 74.365
|
|
Change From Baseline in Monocytes
Day 29
|
0.125 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.485
|
0.117 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.340
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate basophils was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=455 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=452 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Basophils
Day 3
|
0.020 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.257
|
0.005 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.043
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basophils
Day 5
|
0.038 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.501
|
0.005 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.370
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basophils
Day 8
|
0.196 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 3.132
|
0.005 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.368
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basophils
Day 11
|
0.024 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.042
|
0.028 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.053
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basophils
Day 15
|
0.158 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 1.913
|
-0.058 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 1.028
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basophils
Day 29
|
0.040 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.073
|
0.029 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.054
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15 and 29Population: The safety population includes all treated participants with available data at baseline and the post baseline assessment point, analyzed as treated.
Blood to evaluate eosinophils was collected at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29, with the Day 1 assessment serving as baseline. Participants who had been discharged had blood collected if infection control measures allowed for in-person visits after discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=456 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=455 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Eosinophils
Day 3
|
0.634 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 10.614
|
0.016 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.727
|
|
Change From Baseline in Eosinophils
Day 5
|
0.666 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 11.977
|
-0.066 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 2.807
|
|
Change From Baseline in Eosinophils
Day 8
|
0.596 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 8.875
|
-0.221 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 4.108
|
|
Change From Baseline in Eosinophils
Day 11
|
0.093 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.190
|
-0.088 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 2.973
|
|
Change From Baseline in Eosinophils
Day 15
|
1.992 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 20.365
|
-0.420 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 5.378
|
|
Change From Baseline in Eosinophils
Day 29
|
0.241 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.324
|
0.211 10^9 cells/liter
Standard Deviation 0.267
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15, 22, and 29Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized with data at baseline and at each timepoint.
The NEW score has demonstrated an ability to discriminate patients at risk of poor outcomes. This score is based on 7 clinical parameters (respiration rate, oxygen saturation, any supplemental oxygen, temperature, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, level of consciousness). The NEW Score is being used as an efficacy measure. The minimum score is 0, representing the better outcome, and the maximum value is 19, representing the worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=499 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=502 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) From Baseline
Day 3
|
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
-0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
|
Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) From Baseline
Day 5
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
-0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
|
Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) From Baseline
Day 8
|
-0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
-0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
|
Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) From Baseline
Day 11
|
-0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
-0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
|
Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) From Baseline
Day 15
|
-1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
-1.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.6
|
|
Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) From Baseline
Day 22
|
-1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
-1.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
|
Change in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) From Baseline
Day 29
|
-3.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
-3.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
Death at or before study Visit
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
Hospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMO
|
30 percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 34.0
|
24 percentage of participants
Interval 21.0 to 28.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
Hospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2
|
19 percentage of participants
Interval 16.0 to 22.0
|
18 percentage of participants
Interval 15.0 to 21.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
|
39 percentage of participants
Interval 35.0 to 43.0
|
43 percentage of participants
Interval 39.0 to 47.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
Hospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing care
|
12 percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 15.0
|
14 percentage of participants
Interval 11.0 to 17.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
Hospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req care
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
Not hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
No clinical status score reported - Hospitalized
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
No clinical status score reported - Discharged
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 1
No clinical status score reported - Discontinued
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
Death at or before study Visit
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
Hospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMO
|
36 percentage of participants
Interval 32.0 to 40.0
|
28 percentage of participants
Interval 25.0 to 32.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
Hospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2
|
17 percentage of participants
Interval 14.0 to 21.0
|
16 percentage of participants
Interval 13.0 to 19.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
|
32 percentage of participants
Interval 29.0 to 37.0
|
37 percentage of participants
Interval 33.0 to 41.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
Hospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing care
|
12 percentage of participants
Interval 9.0 to 15.0
|
13 percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 16.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
Hospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req care
|
0.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
Not hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
No clinical status score reported - Hospitalized
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
No clinical status score reported - Discharged
|
0.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 3
No clinical status score reported - Discontinued
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 5Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
Death at or before study Visit
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
Hospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMO
|
37 percentage of participants
Interval 33.0 to 41.0
|
28 percentage of participants
Interval 24.0 to 32.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
Hospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2
|
14 percentage of participants
Interval 12.0 to 18.0
|
12 percentage of participants
Interval 9.0 to 15.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
|
26 percentage of participants
Interval 23.0 to 30.0
|
28 percentage of participants
Interval 24.0 to 31.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
Hospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing care
|
11 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 13.0
|
15 percentage of participants
Interval 12.0 to 18.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
Hospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req care
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
Not hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
|
0.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
No clinical status score reported - Hospitalized
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
No clinical status score reported - Discharged
|
7 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 9.0
|
12 percentage of participants
Interval 9.0 to 15.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 5
No clinical status score reported - Discontinued
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 8Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
Death at or before study Visit
|
7 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 9.0
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
Hospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMO
|
33 percentage of participants
Interval 29.0 to 37.0
|
24 percentage of participants
Interval 21.0 to 28.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
Hospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 12.0
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 12.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
|
15 percentage of participants
Interval 13.0 to 19.0
|
17 percentage of participants
Interval 14.0 to 21.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
Hospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing care
|
10 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 13.0
|
11 percentage of participants
Interval 9.0 to 14.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
Hospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req care
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
Not hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
|
0.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
No clinical status score reported - Hospitalized
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
No clinical status score reported - Discharged
|
22 percentage of participants
Interval 19.0 to 26.0
|
30 percentage of participants
Interval 27.0 to 34.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 8
No clinical status score reported - Discontinued
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
4 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 11Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
Death at or before study Visit
|
8 percentage of participants
Interval 6.0 to 11.0
|
4 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
Hospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMO
|
28 percentage of participants
Interval 25.0 to 32.0
|
22 percentage of participants
Interval 19.0 to 26.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
Hospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2
|
7 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 10.0
|
6 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 8.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
|
13 percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 16.0
|
11 percentage of participants
Interval 9.0 to 14.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
Hospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing care
|
6 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 9.0
|
7 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 9.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
Hospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req care
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
Not hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2
|
0.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
|
0.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
No clinical status score reported - Hospitalized
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
No clinical status score reported - Discharged
|
33 percentage of participants
Interval 29.0 to 37.0
|
44 percentage of participants
Interval 40.0 to 48.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 11
No clinical status score reported - Discontinued
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
4 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 15Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
Death at or before study Visit
|
11 percentage of participants
Interval 9.0 to 14.0
|
6 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 9.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
Hospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMO
|
22 percentage of participants
Interval 19.0 to 26.0
|
15 percentage of participants
Interval 13.0 to 19.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
Hospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2
|
4 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 6.0
|
4 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
|
11 percentage of participants
Interval 9.0 to 14.0
|
10 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 13.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
Hospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing care
|
6 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 9.0
|
7 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 9.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
Hospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req care
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
Not hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2
|
17 percentage of participants
Interval 14.0 to 21.0
|
19 percentage of participants
Interval 16.0 to 22.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
|
22 percentage of participants
Interval 19.0 to 26.0
|
29 percentage of participants
Interval 25.0 to 33.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
No clinical status score reported - Hospitalized
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
No clinical status score reported - Discharged
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 15
No clinical status score reported - Discontinued
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
|
5 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 7.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 22Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
Death at or before study Visit
|
13 percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 16.0
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 12.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
Hospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMO
|
14 percentage of participants
Interval 12.0 to 18.0
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 12.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
Hospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
|
8 percentage of participants
Interval 6.0 to 11.0
|
5 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 8.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
Hospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing care
|
5 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 8.0
|
6 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 8.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
Hospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req care
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
Not hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2
|
18 percentage of participants
Interval 15.0 to 22.0
|
19 percentage of participants
Interval 16.0 to 23.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
|
32 percentage of participants
Interval 29.0 to 37.0
|
39 percentage of participants
Interval 35.0 to 43.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
No clinical status score reported - Hospitalized
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
No clinical status score reported - Discharged
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
No clinical status score reported - Discontinued
|
4 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
6 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 8.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 22
Completed study without reporting score
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 29Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities
|
36 percentage of participants
Interval 32.0 to 41.0
|
46 percentage of participants
Interval 42.0 to 50.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
No clinical status score reported - Discharged
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
Death at or before study Visit
|
15 percentage of participants
Interval 12.0 to 18.0
|
11 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 14.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
Hospitalized, on invasive mech. vent. or ECMO
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 11.0
|
6 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 8.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
Hospitalized, on non-invasive vent./high flow O2
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
|
4 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 6.0
|
4 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
Hospitalized, not on O2, requiring ongoing care
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
Hospitalized, not requiring O2, no longer req care
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
Not hospitalized, limit on activities/req home O2
|
19 percentage of participants
Interval 16.0 to 23.0
|
20 percentage of participants
Interval 17.0 to 23.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
No clinical status score reported - Hospitalized
|
0.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
No clinical status score reported - Discontinued
|
5 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 7.0
|
7 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 9.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants at Each Clinical Status Using Ordinal Scale at Day 29
Completed study without reporting score
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The safety population includes all participants with available data post baseline, analyzed as treated.
Grade 3 AEs are defined as events that interrupt usual activities of daily living, or significantly affects clinical status, or may require intensive therapeutic intervention. Severe events are usually incapacitating. Grade 4 AEs are defined as events that are potentially life threatening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=516 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=532 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Grade 3 and 4 Clinical and/or Laboratory Adverse Events (AEs)
|
57 percentage of participants
Interval 52.8 to 61.5
|
51 percentage of participants
Interval 47.0 to 55.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The safety population includes all participants with available data post baseline, analyzed as treated.
An SAE is defined as an AE or suspected adverse reaction is considered serious if, in the view of either the investigator or the sponsor, it results in death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=516 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=532 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
|
32 percentage of participants
Interval 27.7 to 35.7
|
24 percentage of participants
Interval 20.9 to 28.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 10Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
Participants may have been discontinued from investigational therapeutics due to discharge or death. The halting or slowing of the infusion for any reason was collected, as was missed doses in the series of 10 doses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Discontinued or Temporarily Suspended From Investigational Therapeutics
Discontinued due to discharge
|
30 percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 34.0
|
41 percentage of participants
Interval 37.0 to 45.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Discontinued or Temporarily Suspended From Investigational Therapeutics
Discontinued due to death
|
4 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Discontinued or Temporarily Suspended From Investigational Therapeutics
Any infusions halted or slowed
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Discontinued or Temporarily Suspended From Investigational Therapeutics
Missed any maintenance dose
|
21 percentage of participants
Interval 18.0 to 25.0
|
16 percentage of participants
Interval 13.0 to 19.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized
Duration of hospitalization was determined two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Hospitalization
Restricted to participants who did not die
|
14 Days
Interval 7.0 to 27.0
|
10 Days
Interval 5.0 to 21.0
|
|
Duration of Hospitalization
Including imputation for participants who died
|
17 Days
Interval 8.0 to 28.0
|
12 Days
Interval 6.0 to 28.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The analysis population is restricted to randomized participants who were not on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen at baseline but who subsequently required non-invasive or high-flow oxygen.
Duration of new non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen use was measured in days among participants who were not on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen use at baseline, determined two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=64 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=52 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of New Non-invasive Ventilation or High Flow Oxygen Use
Including imputations for participants who died
|
4 Days
Interval 2.0 to 23.5
|
3 Days
Interval 1.0 to 10.5
|
|
Duration of New Non-invasive Ventilation or High Flow Oxygen Use
Among participants who did not die
|
3 Days
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
3 Days
Interval 1.0 to 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The analysis population is restricted to randomized participants who were not on oxygen at baseline but who subsequently required oxygen.
Duration of new oxygen use was measured in days among participants who were not on oxygen at baseline, determined two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die .
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=27 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of New Oxygen Use
Including imputations for participants who died
|
5.5 Days
Interval 1.0 to 15.0
|
4 Days
Interval 2.0 to 12.0
|
|
Duration of New Oxygen Use
Among participants who did not die
|
3 Days
Interval 1.0 to 13.0
|
3.5 Days
Interval 2.0 to 5.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The analysis population is restricted to randomized participants not on a ventilator or ECMO at baseline but who subsequently required a ventilator or ECMO.
Duration of new ventilator or ECMO use was measured in days among participants who were not on a ventilator or ECMO at baseline, determined two ways. The first includes imputations for participants who died. The second method is restricted to participants who did not die
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=82 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=52 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of New Ventilator or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Use
Including imputations for participants who died
|
23 Days
Interval 12.0 to 28.0
|
21.5 Days
Interval 9.0 to 28.0
|
|
Duration of New Ventilator or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Use
Among participants who did not die
|
16 Days
Interval 9.0 to 24.0
|
14 Days
Interval 5.0 to 26.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The analysis population is restricted to randomized participants who were not on non-invasive or high-flow oxygen at baseline.
New non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen use was determined as the percentage of subject not on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=266 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=307 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Requiring New Non-invasive Ventilation or High-flow Oxygen Use
|
24 percentage of participants
Interval 19.0 to 30.0
|
17 percentage of participants
Interval 13.0 to 22.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The analysis population is restricted to randomized participants not requiring oxygen at baseline.
The percentage of participants requiring new oxygen use was determined as the percentage of participants not requiring oxygen at baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=63 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=75 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Requiring New Oxygen Use
|
44 percentage of participants
Interval 33.0 to 57.0
|
36 percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 47.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The analysis population is restricted to randomized participants not on a ventilator or ECMO at baseline.
The percentage of participants requiring new ventilator or ECMO use was determined as the percentage not on a ventilator or ECMO at baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=364 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=402 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Requiring New Ventilator or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Use
|
23 percentage of participants
Interval 19.0 to 27.0
|
13 percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 17.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15, 22, and 29Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population includes all participants who were randomized reporting a clinical score. Missing values were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward. Clinical scores of 8 were carried forward from the date of death for participants who died.
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. A positive change indicates a worsening and a negative change is an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=518 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=533 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in the Ordinal Scale
Day 29
|
-2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
-2.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
|
Mean Change in the Ordinal Scale
Day 3
|
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
|
Mean Change in the Ordinal Scale
Day 5
|
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
|
Mean Change in the Ordinal Scale
Day 8
|
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
-0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
|
Mean Change in the Ordinal Scale
Day 11
|
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
-0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
|
Mean Change in the Ordinal Scale
Day 15
|
-1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
-1.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Mean Change in the Ordinal Scale
Day 22
|
-1.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
-2.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 15Population: The ITT population consists of all participants as randomized.
The mortality rate was determined as the proportion of participants who died by study Day 15.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
14-day Participant Mortality
|
0.12 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.09 to 0.15
|
0.07 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.05 to 0.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The ITT population includes all participants as randomized
The mortality rate was determined as the proportion of participants who died by study Day 29.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
29-day Participant Mortality
|
0.15 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.12 to 0.19
|
0.11 Proportion of participants
Interval 0.09 to 0.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The ITT population includes all participants as randomized
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 8) Death; 7) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 6) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 5) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 3) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 2) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 1) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Time to improvement by at least one category was determined for each participant
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to an Improvement by at Least One Category Using an Ordinal Scale
|
9 Days
Interval 8.0 to 11.0
|
7 Days
Interval 6.0 to 8.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The ITT population includes all participants as randomized
The ordinal scale is an assessment of the clinical status at the first assessment of a given study day. The scale is as follows: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 7) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 8) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Time to improvement by at least two categories was determined for each participant
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to an Improvement of at Least Two Categories Using an Ordinal Scale
|
14 Days
Interval 13.0 to 15.0
|
11 Days
Interval 10.0 to 13.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29Population: The ITT population includes all participants as randomized.
The NEW score has demonstrated an ability to discriminate patients at risk of poor outcomes. This score is based on 7 clinical parameters (respiration rate, oxygen saturation, any supplemental oxygen, temperature, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, level of consciousness). The NEW Score is being used as an efficacy measure. The minimum score is 0, representing the better outcome, and the maximum value is 19, representing the worse outcome. The time to discharge or a NEWS of less than or equal to 2 was determined for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=521 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=541 Participants
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Discharge or to a NEWS of 2 or Less and Maintained for 24 Hours, Whichever Occurs First
|
12 Days
Interval 10.0 to 15.0
|
8 Days
Interval 7.0 to 9.0
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Remdesivir
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=516 participants at risk
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=532 participants at risk
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Coagulopathy
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
1.4%
7/516 • Number of events 7 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
1.9%
10/532 • Number of events 10 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.94%
5/532 • Number of events 6 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.58%
3/516 • Number of events 3 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.78%
4/516 • Number of events 4 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.58%
3/516 • Number of events 3 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.38%
2/532 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
|
0.39%
2/516 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pulseless electrical activity
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac tamponade
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.56%
3/532 • Number of events 3 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal perforation
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal perforation
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peptic ulcer haemorrhage
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
General disorders
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
|
0.58%
3/516 • Number of events 3 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.94%
5/532 • Number of events 5 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.39%
2/516 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Ischaemic hepatitis
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
2.9%
15/516 • Number of events 15 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
1.5%
8/532 • Number of events 8 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.97%
5/516 • Number of events 5 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.38%
2/532 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
|
0.39%
2/516 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 pneumonia
|
0.39%
2/516 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.39%
2/516 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.39%
2/516 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Catheter bacteraemia
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infectious pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal bacteraemia
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial sepsis
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Endocarditis bacterial
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pneumothorax
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Investigations
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
|
0.39%
2/516 • Number of events 3 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.94%
5/532 • Number of events 5 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.39%
2/516 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Investigations
Oxygen saturation decreased
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Acidosis
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myopathy
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.56%
3/532 • Number of events 3 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.38%
2/532 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebellar infarction
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Depressed level of consciousness
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhagic transformation stroke
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Intensive care unit acquired weakness
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorder
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
2.3%
12/516 • Number of events 12 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
1.3%
7/532 • Number of events 7 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.97%
5/516 • Number of events 5 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.38%
2/532 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
0.58%
3/516 • Number of events 3 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
11.2%
58/516 • Number of events 59 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
6.6%
35/532 • Number of events 36 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
2.7%
14/516 • Number of events 14 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
1.5%
8/532 • Number of events 8 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
2.1%
11/516 • Number of events 11 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
1.1%
6/532 • Number of events 6 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.97%
5/516 • Number of events 5 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
1.3%
7/532 • Number of events 7 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.97%
5/516 • Number of events 5 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.94%
5/532 • Number of events 5 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.78%
4/516 • Number of events 4 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.94%
5/532 • Number of events 5 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.78%
4/516 • Number of events 4 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.75%
4/532 • Number of events 4 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
0.39%
2/516 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.75%
4/532 • Number of events 4 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.56%
3/532 • Number of events 3 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory disorder
|
0.39%
2/516 • Number of events 2 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.00%
0/532 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Subcutaneous emphysema
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Endotracheal intubation
|
1.7%
9/516 • Number of events 9 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
1.1%
6/532 • Number of events 6 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Mechanical ventilation
|
0.58%
3/516 • Number of events 3 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
1.4%
7/516 • Number of events 7 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.75%
4/532 • Number of events 4 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Shock
|
0.78%
4/516 • Number of events 4 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.94%
5/532 • Number of events 5 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.19%
1/516 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Embolism venous
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery occlusion
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Shock haemorrhagic
|
0.00%
0/516 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
0.19%
1/532 • Number of events 1 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=516 participants at risk
200 mg of Remdesivir placebo administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir placebo while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
Remdesivir
n=532 participants at risk
200 mg of Remdesivir administered intravenously on Day 1, followed by a 100 mg once-daily maintenance dose of Remdesivir while hospitalized for up to a 10 days total course.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
|
14.3%
74/516 • Number of events 81 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
10.3%
55/532 • Number of events 59 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
12.0%
62/516 • Number of events 69 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
9.0%
48/532 • Number of events 51 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
10.5%
54/516 • Number of events 63 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
8.3%
44/532 • Number of events 56 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
10.1%
52/516 • Number of events 58 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
7.9%
42/532 • Number of events 52 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
6.2%
32/516 • Number of events 37 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
7.1%
38/532 • Number of events 52 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
6.6%
34/516 • Number of events 43 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
6.4%
34/532 • Number of events 36 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
7.0%
36/516 • Number of events 41 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
5.8%
31/532 • Number of events 33 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
|
5.2%
27/516 • Number of events 31 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
7.3%
39/532 • Number of events 45 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
6.4%
33/516 • Number of events 35 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
3.4%
18/532 • Number of events 19 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
5.8%
30/516 • Number of events 34 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
2.4%
13/532 • Number of events 15 • Grade 3 and 4 serious and non-serious adverse events were collected for 29 days after the first dose. Laboratory values were systematically assessed at Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 while participants were inpatient, and at Days 15 and 29.
Given the nature of severity of the underlying illness, participants were expected to have many symptoms and abnormalities in vital signs and laboratory values. All Grade 3 and 4 AEs were captured as AEs in this trial. In addition, any Grade 2 or higher, suspected drug-related hypersensitivity reaction was to be reported as an AE in this trial. All cause mortality was calculated for the ITT population, while SAEs and AEs reflect the as treated population.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60