Optimising Treatments for Faecal Incontinence

NCT04273009 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2020-02-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of the study is to directly compare two medical treatments for faecal incontinence: Renew™ Anal Insert and Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) for a period of 12 weeks. Both are routinely used in our practice.

Conditions

  • Faecal Incontinence
  • Pelvic Floor Disorders

Interventions

DEVICE

Renew VS PTNS

These will be prescribed and applied as described above.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • London North West Healthcare NHS Trust

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-12-15
Primary Completion
2018-08-11
Completion
2018-09-11

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04273009 on ClinicalTrials.gov