Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Assess Recurrence of Actinic Keratosis in Participants Treated With Methyl Aminolevulinate Hydrochloride Cream or Vehicle Cream Who Achieved Complete Response to Treated Lesions in Earlier Study (NCT NCT04269395)
NCT ID: NCT04269395
Last Updated: 2023-10-10
Results Overview
Participants with recurrence are defined as the participants with recurrence of any (greater than and equal to \[\>=\] 1) cleared treated AK lesions. Number of participants with recurrence of any (\>=1) cleared treated AK lesions at Week 54 was reported.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
125 participants
At Week 54
2023-10-10
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at 31 study centers in United States from 7 April 2020 to 1 September 2021. Participants who completed study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response (CR) of all treated Actinic Keratosis (AKs) lesions at final visit of treatment, were continued to be followed in this for long-term follow-up (LTFU) study to assess recurrence.
125 participants (87 in Methyl aminolevulinate hydrochloride (MAL) 16.8% cream group and 38 in vehicle cream group) from main study RD.06.SPR.112199 were enrolled and treated in this study. Study was terminated early as in main study, primary analysis did not show superiority of MAL 16.8% cream with DL-PDT over vehicle cream with DL-PDT as of participant complete response (CR), and the sponsor decided not to apply for marketing authorization for the MAL 16.8% cream in combination with DL-PDT.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
MAL Cream Arm
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit of the active cream group (MAL), continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
Vehicle Cream Arm
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit in the vehicle cream group, continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
87
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
73
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
MAL Cream Arm
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit of the active cream group (MAL), continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
Vehicle Cream Arm
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit in the vehicle cream group, continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Study terminated by Sponsor
|
13
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Assess Recurrence of Actinic Keratosis in Participants Treated With Methyl Aminolevulinate Hydrochloride Cream or Vehicle Cream Who Achieved Complete Response to Treated Lesions in Earlier Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
MAL Cream Arm
n=87 Participants
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit of the active cream group (MAL), continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
Vehicle Cream Arm
n=38 Participants
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit in the vehicle cream group, continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
Total
n=125 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
69.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.88 • n=99 Participants
|
66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.89 • n=107 Participants
|
68.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.92 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
29 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
58 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
87 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type I
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type II
|
43 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type III
|
35 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type IV
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type V
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type VI
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 54Population: Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants with recurrence are defined as the participants with recurrence of any (greater than and equal to \[\>=\] 1) cleared treated AK lesions. Number of participants with recurrence of any (\>=1) cleared treated AK lesions at Week 54 was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MAL Cream Arm
n=75 Participants
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit of the active cream group (MAL), continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
Vehicle Cream Arm
n=30 Participants
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit in the vehicle cream group, continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Recurrence of Any (>=1) Cleared Treated AK Lesions at Week 54
|
30 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 28 and Week 54Population: Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses. Screen failures were not to be included in the safety population. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable at the specified timepoints.
Recurrence is defined as the percentage of recurrence of cleared treated lesions. Percent recurrence of cleared treated actinic keratosis lesions at Week 28 and Week 54 was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MAL Cream Arm
n=81 Participants
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit of the active cream group (MAL), continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
Vehicle Cream Arm
n=38 Participants
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit in the vehicle cream group, continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Recurrence of Cleared Treated AK Lesions at Week 28 and Week 54
At Week 28
|
6.91 Percent recurrence
Standard Deviation 14.875
|
7.50 Percent recurrence
Standard Deviation 16.154
|
|
Percent Recurrence of Cleared Treated AK Lesions at Week 28 and Week 54
At Week 54
|
10.46 Percent recurrence
Standard Deviation 15.692
|
12.72 Percent recurrence
Standard Deviation 20.669
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 28Population: Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants with recurrence are defined as the participants with recurrence of any (greater than and equal to \[\>=\] 1) cleared treated AK lesions. Number of participants with recurrence of any (\>=1) cleared treated AK lesions at Week 28 was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MAL Cream Arm
n=81 Participants
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit of the active cream group (MAL), continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
Vehicle Cream Arm
n=38 Participants
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit in the vehicle cream group, continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Recurrence of Any (>=1) Cleared Treated AK Lesions at Week 28
|
19 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
Adverse Events
MAL Cream Arm
Vehicle Cream Arm
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
MAL Cream Arm
n=87 participants at risk
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit of the active cream group (MAL), continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
Vehicle Cream Arm
n=38 participants at risk
Participants who completed the study RD.06.SPR.112199 (NCT04085367) and achieved complete response of all treated lesions at the final visit in the vehicle cream group, continued for long-term follow-up to evaluate recurrence of AKs in this study. No treatment was given to participants in this study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Actinic Keratosis
|
13.8%
12/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
13.2%
5/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Androgenetic Alopecia
|
0.00%
0/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.00%
0/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Application site erythema
|
3.4%
3/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Application site atrophy
|
2.3%
2/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Gait disturbance
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Corona virus infection
|
3.4%
3/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoporosis
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin papilloma
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of skin
|
0.00%
0/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
0.00%
0/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrist fracture
|
0.00%
0/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.00%
0/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
1.1%
1/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast mass
|
0.00%
0/87 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
2.6%
1/38 • From start of study drug administration up to Week 54
Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants and was to be used for all efficacy and safety analyses.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place