Comparison of "Roll-over' Technique With Standard Abdominal Paracentesis in Suspected Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
NCT04232384 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 71
Last updated 2022-03-17
Summary
The study will be a randomized trial that will compare two techniques of abdominal paracentesis in patients with suspected peritoneal carcinomatosis. The patients will undergo abdominal paracentesis by the standard technique and a rollover technique. In the standard technique, the patients will lie flat for 10 minutes and abdominal paracentesis will be taken for ascitic fluid cytology. In the rollover group, patients with suspected peritoneal carcinomatosis will be rolled over thrice laterally on each side by 90 degrees and sample will then be obtained for ascitic fluid cytology. both the samples will be processed by blinded cytopathologist for tumour cellularity and diagnostic yield.
Conditions
- Ascites
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- Peritoneum Neoplasm
- Tuberculous Peritonitis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard Paracentesis
The patients will be asked to lie supine for 10 minutes and no changes in posture will be allowed for this period. Abdominal paracentesis will be done either by blind technique (in case the ascites is clinically detectable) or ultrasonography guided (in cases the ascites is not clinically detectable).
- PROCEDURE
-
Roll Over Paracentesis
Patients with ascites will be rolled over thrice in bed laterally upto 90 degrees on either side (Figure 1) and ascitic fluid sample is drawn within 1 minute of the last rollover. There will be four steps to this i.e roll over to one side at 90 degrees and then 180 degrees to the other side, then back to the first side and then back to the center (to complete three turns). This will be done after the disinfection and cleaning of the anterior abdominal wall have been done and the personnel involved in the procedure are ready for the paracentesis. The ascitic paracentesis will be initiated within one minute of the completion of the turn. One assistant will maintain a stopwatch during this period to ensure compliance with this.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Vishal Sharma, MD · Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 12 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-06-15
- Primary Completion
- 2021-07-01
- Completion
- 2021-07-01
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Timing of Surgical Intervention After Percutaneous Catheter Drainage in STEP UP Approach for Severe Acute Pancreatitis
NCT01527084 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EUS Guided Drainage of Post Pancreatitis Pancreatic Fluid Collection
NCT06280248 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Perform Necrotic Cavity Lavage or Not After Debridement of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis
NCT04275466 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT04847297 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Early Versus Standard Endoscopic Interventions for Peripancreatic Fluid Collections
NCT05281458 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Cystogastrostomy Versus Endoscopic Cystogastrostomy
NCT02041793 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Endoscopic Stenting and Cholecystojejunostomy for PreoperativeDrainage Before Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT01913275 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Precutting Versus Conventional Over-the-Wire Sphinchterotomy For Managment Of Large Common Bile Duct Stones
NCT06106724 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life Assessment Between Internal Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Drainage in Biliary Obstruction
NCT04857424 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Spyglass+RFA Versus Cytobrush+RFA for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT05233293 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage
NCT01686425 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Trial Comparing Endoscopy and Surgery for Pancreatic Cyst-gastrostomy
NCT00826501 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-guided Biliary Drainage Versus Percutanenous Transhepatic Biliary Darinage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction After Failed ERCP
NCT02103413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Active Versus Non Active Drainage for the Treatment of Infected Intra-abdominal Collection
NCT01513421 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Fistulotomy as the Primary Cannulation Technique for All Patients Undergoing ERCP: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
NCT04559867 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dual-lumen Catheter-guided Mini-forceps Biopsy and Brush Cytology with Vacuum Aspiration in Suspicious Biliary Strictures
NCT06612931 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A RCT of Low MBO Drainage Strategies
NCT06196164 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Parietal Peritoneum as a Substitute Graft for Venous Reconstruction in HPB Surgery
NCT02121886 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Early (4 Days) Versus Standard Drainage of the Abdominal Cavity After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT01368094 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial on Pancreatic Stent Tube in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT00628186 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Pancreatectomy: A Randomized Prospective Trial
NCT02230436 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial of Percutaneous vs. Endoscopic Drainage of Suspected Klatskin Tumors
NCT03172832 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Modified vs Conventional Blumgart Anastomosis of LPD for the Effects of Pancreatic Fistula of Periampullary Carcinoma
NCT06076252 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Versus Radiologic Biliary Drainage for Perihilar Malignant Obstruction
NCT05078801 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Modified Duct-to-mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT03600584 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA