Clinical Outcomes of NOSES Versus Traditional Robotic-assisted Surgery for Patients With Colorectal Cancer

NCT04230772 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 550

Last updated 2020-01-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this study, the investigators will compare the clinical outcomes of the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus traditional robotic-assisted surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Conditions

  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Neoplasms Malignant
  • Complication of Surgical Procedure
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery

In the experimental group, patients will be performed robotic colorectal resection with natural orifice specimen extraction.

PROCEDURE

Traditional Robotic-assisted Surgery

In the active comparator group, patients will be performed traditional robotic-assisted colorectal resection.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Taiyuan Li

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Taiyuan Li, M.D., Ph.D · Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-02-01
Primary Completion
2021-12-31
Completion
2022-12-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04230772 on ClinicalTrials.gov