Review of Efficacy of Used ultraSonic Energy Device
NCT04226482 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2020-05-18
Summary
Single-use medical instruments are intended by the manufacturers for single-use only or for single-patient-use only. Nevertheless, single-use instruments are being reused more than once in many countries around the world. The reasons are mainly economic in developing countries and environmental in developed countries. Concerns are being raised regarding reused instruments sterility and efficacy. Since there is paucity of evidence on safety of multiple use of single-use instruments in surgery, we decided to conduct a clinical study comparing the same surgical procedure performed with new versus reused surgical instrument. We decided to study laparoscopic appendectomy which is a simple and the most common emergency surgery. Instrument under the scrutiny is ultrasonic scalpel which uses high-frequency ultrasound vibration for coagulating and cutting tissue. In the studied period of time, all eligible patients with acute appendicitis will be randomized in two groups, first having surgery with new device and the second having surgery with reused device. Removed appendix will be analyzed for lateral thermal damage and the patients will be followed-up for one month for potential differences in clinical outcomes like pain-killers consumption, length of stay and postoperative complications.
Conditions
- Appendicitis Acute
- Safety Issues
- Complication of Surgical Procedure
- Device Induced Injury
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
New Device
Laparoscopic appendectomy using new ultrasonic shears.
- DEVICE
-
Used Device
Laparoscopic appendectomy using reprocessed ultrasonic shears.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital of Split
collaborator OTHER -
General Hospital Zadar
collaborator OTHER -
University of Split, School of Medicine
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jakov Mihanovic, MD · General Hospital Zadar
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 5 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-05-27
- Primary Completion
- 2020-04-13
- Completion
- 2020-05-14
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Croatia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block vs. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05632991 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
NCT02185716 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
4-Point TAP Block vs. Combined RSB-OSTAP Block for Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07264608 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Ultrasonic Dissection Assisted Minilaparotomy Cholecystectomy
NCT01723540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Effect of Subcostal TAP Block
NCT02708017 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasonically Activated Scalpel Versus Electrocautery Based Dissection in Acute Cholecystitis Trial
NCT03014817 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery: Using Natural Orfices
NCT00530998 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
"The Efficiency of Laparoscopic-assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain
NCT04641403 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
USG-guided M-TAPA vs OSTAP Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05108129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery: Using Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES)
NCT00531219 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
EOIB for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06656299 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01595165 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
External Oblique Plane Block and Subcostal Tap Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07061262 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of TENS on Patient Outcomes After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05962853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Versus Paravertebral Block in the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02379780 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lung Ultrasound, Cholecystectomy, Atelectasis
NCT06664658 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video-assisted Umbilical Fascial Closure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05208385 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Quadratus Lumborum Block With the Transversus Abdominis Plan Block
NCT03112915 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02712151 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Modified-thoracoabdominal Nerves Block Through a Perichondrial Approach
NCT05017090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
External Oblique Intercostal Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients
NCT06201364 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Ultrasound Assessment of Airway Edema During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07021482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Acupressure Application on Patients' Nausea, Vomiting, Pain, and Sleep Quality
NCT05003284 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Application Effects on Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06008262 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of OSTAP, ESP Block,Injection of Local Anesthetic to Trocar Insertion for Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03719157 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA