Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pattern - Reach Aim 2 (NCT NCT04216264)

NCT ID: NCT04216264

Last Updated: 2022-11-16

Results Overview

Completed Likert scale with 1=very unsatisfied, 2=unsatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5=very satisfied

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

28 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

3 to 6 months after baseline assessment

Results posted on

2022-11-16

Participant Flow

Participants are recruited as caregiver/child dyads.

Participants will be screened for eligibility and if eligible and they consent, complete a questionnaire identifying current potential risks for obesity in infancy. Once one of the three domains is identified, parents will be given scripted educational and supportive messaging relevant to the domain.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Standard Response Caregiver/Child Dyad - Caregiver
Standard response: Parents pick from a menu of behavior changes
Standard Response Caregiver/Child Dyad - Child
Standard response: Parents pick from a menu of behavior changes
Targeted Response Caregiver/Child Dyad - Caregiver
Targeted response: Stepped up phone interaction with parents based on menu of behavior changes
Targeted Response Caregiver/Child Dyad - Child
Targeted response: Stepped up phone interaction with parents based on menu of behavior changes
Overall Study
STARTED
7
7
7
7
Overall Study
COMPLETED
5
5
2
2
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
2
5
5

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Pattern - Reach Aim 2

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Standard Response Caregiver/Child Dyad - Child
n=7 Participants
Standard response: Parents pick from a menu of behavior changes
Targeted Response Caregiver/Child Dyad - Child
n=7 Participants
Targeted response: Stepped up phone interaction with parents based on menu of behavior changes
Total
n=14 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
14 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Continuous
1 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=99 Participants
1 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=107 Participants
1 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
14 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
14 Participants
n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 to 6 months after baseline assessment

Population: Caregiver/child dyads who completed the study.

Completed Likert scale with 1=very unsatisfied, 2=unsatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5=very satisfied

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Targeted Response Caregiver/Child Dyads
n=2 Participants
Targeted response: Stepped up phone interaction with parents based on menu of behavior changes
Standard Response Caregiver/Child Dyads
n=5 Participants
Standard response: Parents pick from a menu of behavior changes
Number of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied With Information Given to Them, as Measured by Follow up Questionnaire
2 Participants
4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 to 6 months after baseline assessment

Population: Participants with data collected.

Number of successful contacts with families divided by number of attempts to contact by research staff x 100

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Targeted Response Caregiver/Child Dyads
n=3 Participants
Targeted response: Stepped up phone interaction with parents based on menu of behavior changes
Standard Response Caregiver/Child Dyads
n=7 Participants
Standard response: Parents pick from a menu of behavior changes
Percentage of Successful Contacts With Families Via Telephone and/or in Clinic
100 percentage of contacts
85.8 percentage of contacts

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 to 6 months after baseline assessment

Population: Participants with data collected.

Dyad caregivers were asked what type of milk was being consumed by the infant, with 4 options available: 1) Formula only, 2) Mostly formula and some breast milk, 3) Mostly breast milk, but some formula, or 4) Breast milk only.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Targeted Response Caregiver/Child Dyads
n=3 Participants
Targeted response: Stepped up phone interaction with parents based on menu of behavior changes
Standard Response Caregiver/Child Dyads
n=7 Participants
Standard response: Parents pick from a menu of behavior changes
Percent of Participants Exclusively Breastfeeding at 4 Months Postnatal Age
33.3 percentage of participants
71.4 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 to 6 months after baseline assessment

Population: Participants with data collected.

Dyads caregivers were asked, "Is your baby eating solid foods yet or do you put any solid foods in the bottle?", with 2 options available: 1) Yes or 2) No

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Targeted Response Caregiver/Child Dyads
n=3 Participants
Targeted response: Stepped up phone interaction with parents based on menu of behavior changes
Standard Response Caregiver/Child Dyads
n=7 Participants
Standard response: Parents pick from a menu of behavior changes
Percent of Participants Delaying Complementary Feeding Until 4 Months Postnatal Age
33.3 percentage of participants
71.4 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 to 6 months after baseline assessment

Population: Participants with data collected.

Dyad caregivers were asked "I watch TV or look at or use my phone while feeding my baby" and responded with one of 5 Likert-scale responses: 1) Never, 2) Seldom, 3) Half of the time, 4) Most of the time, 5) Always

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Targeted Response Caregiver/Child Dyads
n=3 Participants
Targeted response: Stepped up phone interaction with parents based on menu of behavior changes
Standard Response Caregiver/Child Dyads
n=7 Participants
Standard response: Parents pick from a menu of behavior changes
Percent of Participants Reporting "Never" Engaging in Screentime While Feeding and With '0' Minutes of Active TV Watching at 4 Months Postnatal Age
100 percentage of participants
42.9 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

Standard Response Caregiver/Child Dyad - Child

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Targeted Response Caregiver/Child Dyad - Child

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Charles Wood

Duke University

Phone: 919-620-4772

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place