Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Block in Kyphoplasty
NCT04201678 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2020-07-21
Summary
As of October 2019, when the investigators received the approval of the ethics committee, patients who were decided to undergo kyphoplasty with vertebral compression fracture will be included in the study. The patients will be divided into three groups according to the anesthetic method as conventional local anesthesia infiltration (CLIA) method and extrapedicular infiltration anesthesia (EPIAA) and 30 other patients as US guided erector spina group (ESP) for a total of 60 patients. The degree of pain in the intraoperative period will be assessed using a numerical rating scale. Patients with severe pain (NRS\> 4) will receive 50 micrograms of fentanyl as an additional analgesic. Sedation levels of the patients will be evaluated with ramsey sedation scale (1-6). Patients with a sedation score of 1 will receive 2 mg of midazolam. During the procedure, pain scores at 0 minutes, 15, 30 and 45 minutes, sedation scores, additional analgesic and sedation amounts administered, and hemodynamic parameters will be recorded. The statistical difference between the groups will be compared
Conditions
- Spinal Fractures
- Anesthesia, Regional
- Anesthetics, Local
- Analgesia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
EPIAA Group (Extrapedicular infiltration anesthesia)
The first step was to determine the pedicle to be vertebroplasty, and 5 mL of 1% Lidocaine Hydrochloride bilaterally to infiltrate the skin, subcutaneous tissue and a portion of the lumbodorsal muscles from a point of 1 cm to the pedicle projection point. The anesthesia process of the CLIA + EPIA group also includes the third step called EPIA. For this stage, the anesthetic needle (50 mm 22 Gauge) is first drawn into the subcutaneous tissue, then through the lateral superior articular process to the lateral half of the pedicle and the upper border of the transverse process (5-10 degrees with sagittal plane and 5-10 with coronal plane), and after negative aspiration 3 mL 2% Lidocaine Hydrochloride and 7 mL 0.5% bupivacaine mixture will be applied bilaterally
- PROCEDURE
-
CLIA Group (conventional local anesthesia infiltration)
The first step was to determine the pedicle to be vertebroplasty, and 5 mL of 1% Lidocaine Hydrochloride bilaterally to infiltrate the skin, subcutaneous tissue and a portion of the lumbodorsal muscles from a point of 1 cm to the pedicle projection point. In the CLIA group, the needle (50 mm 22 Gauge) was directed towards the laminar periosteum at the pedicular projection point at the 10-15 ° angle with the sagittal plane. A mixture of 3 mL of 2% Lidocaine Hydrochloride and 7 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine will be applied bilaterally.
- PROCEDURE
-
ESP Group (Erector Spina Block)
The first step was to determine the pedicle to be vertebroplasty, and 5 mL of 1% Lidocaine Hydrochloride bilaterally to infiltrate the skin, subcutaneous tissue and a portion of the lumbodorsal muscles from a point of 1 cm to the pedicle projection point. In the ESP group, a high-frequency-50 15-6 MHz linear ultrasound probe will be placed vertically approximately 3 cm laterally at the point of application. Once the erector spinae muscle and transverse process have been identified, the peripheral nerve blockage needle (50 mm 22 Gauge) will be advanced from caudal to cranial between the fascia of the erector spina muscle and the transverse process. After 1 ml normal saline injection, this plane was opened. Bilateral 3 mL of 2% Lidocaine Hydrochloride and 7 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine will be administered.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Gulhane School of Medicine
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mehmet B EŞKİN · Gulhane Training and Research Hospital
-
Ayşegül Ceylan · Gulhane Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-10-23
- Primary Completion
- 2020-06-01
- Completion
- 2020-06-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Block Method for Pain After Back Surgery
NCT07346599 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Erector Spina Plane Block and Lumbar Plexus Block in Femoral Fracture Surgery
NCT05817916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block Performed Under Direct Vision on Postoperative Pain in Spine Surgery
NCT03960528 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Intraoperative and Postoperative Effects of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spina Plane Block and Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Stabilization Surgery
NCT05845788 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Intraoperative Placement of Superficial Erector Spinae Plane Block; A New Approach in Spine Surgery
NCT05244031 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Three Different Anagesic Techniques In Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fixation Surgery
NCT06801574 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of SPSIPB and ESPB in Anterior Cervical Discectomy
NCT06639022 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Carotid Endarterectomy
NCT04224844 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spina Plane Block for Multilevel Major Spinal Surgery
NCT05983393 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Psoas Compartment Block in Hip Surgery
NCT03904095 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Block Vs Ketamine-based Multimodal Analgesia Protocol in Lumber Decompressive Surgery
NCT07001605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Erector Spina Plan Block Application Time on Postoperative Anxiety
NCT05406128 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block For Enhancement Of Quality of Recovery After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
NCT07166900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cost Effect of Erector Spina Plane Block
NCT04130945 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Regional Analgesia for Anterior Cervical Disc and Fusion Surgery
NCT05680142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral ESP Block and Wound Infiltration for Spinal Surgical Analgesia
NCT04642625 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Vertebral Surgery
NCT04548076 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
USG Guided ESP Block in Spinal Surgery
NCT04148729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Knee Prosthesis
NCT04544423 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block and Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane(TLIP) Block for the Management of Postoperative Pain in Spinal Surgery
NCT04028154 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Erectae Spinae Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesis in Lumbar Surgeries
NCT05123092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-guided ESP Block vs. Wound Infiltration in Lumbar Surgery: A Comparative Analysis (ESP:Erector Spinae Plane)
NCT06567964 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Block Versus Local Field Block in Lumbar Spine Surgeries
NCT05570565 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Patients: a Retrospective Study
NCT03897933 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Classical and Modified Erector Spinae Plane Blocks After Lumbar Spinal Surgery
NCT07348523 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA