Trial Outcomes & Findings for " Application of Art Therapy in Oncology: Evaluation of the Symptomatic of Patients Suffering From a Cancerous Disease" (NCT NCT04195217)
NCT ID: NCT04195217
Last Updated: 2026-08-28
Results Overview
The aim is to evaluate the impact of art therapy as a supportive care on the improvement of the well-being felt after a session of cancer treatments (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, ...), during 6 sessions, in patients having a cancerous pathology. The primary endpoint is the 6-session average of the difference between the ESAS score associated with the patient's well-being symptom (a symptom of "feeling good" on the ESAS assessment), obtained before and after the treatment session. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (SESA) is a 9-item symptom rating scale. The quote goes from 0 to 10. A score close to zero means a better result. Well-being (0=well, 10=bad)
COMPLETED
NA
86 participants
Before and after each chimotherapy session - 6 sessions between 6 weeks to 6 months
2026-08-28
Participant Flow
Recruitment via oral information, posters, and flyers in the oncology-hematology day unit. Participation is voluntary with no compensation. After written information and a 24h-7d reflection period, patients sign informed consent. Randomization (1:1) to control or art-therapy group. Follow-up includes questionnaires and medical records. Study lasts 66-68 months, with 6 sessions per patient over 4-6 months.
No participants were excluded prior to allocation, as no issues or protocol deviations were identified during the enrollment process.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
With Art Therapy
Art therapy as supportive care in 6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments with or without additional supportive care
|
Without Art Therapy
6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments without art therapy with other supportive care added.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
43
|
43
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
31
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
With Art Therapy
n=31 Participants
Art therapy as supportive care in 6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments with or without additional supportive care
|
Without Art Therapy
n=36 Participants
6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments without art therapy with other supportive care added.
|
Total
n=67 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=31 Participants
|
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=36 Participants
|
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=67 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=31 Participants • Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
|
21 Participants
n=36 Participants • Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
|
43 Participants
n=67 Participants • Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=31 Participants • Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
|
15 Participants
n=36 Participants • Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
|
24 Participants
n=67 Participants • Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Type of cancer
Solid cancer
|
27 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
|
Type of cancer
Hematologic cancer
|
4 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
|
Other supportive care
|
24 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Before and after each chimotherapy session - 6 sessions between 6 weeks to 6 monthsPopulation: Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
The aim is to evaluate the impact of art therapy as a supportive care on the improvement of the well-being felt after a session of cancer treatments (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, ...), during 6 sessions, in patients having a cancerous pathology. The primary endpoint is the 6-session average of the difference between the ESAS score associated with the patient's well-being symptom (a symptom of "feeling good" on the ESAS assessment), obtained before and after the treatment session. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (SESA) is a 9-item symptom rating scale. The quote goes from 0 to 10. A score close to zero means a better result. Well-being (0=well, 10=bad)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Without Art Therapy
n=36 Participants
6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments without art therapy with other supportive care added.
|
With Art Therapy
n=31 Participants
Art therapy as supportive care in 6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments with or without additional supportive care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average, Over the 6 Treatment Sessions, of the Change in the ESAS 'Well-being" Assessed Before and After Each Treatment Session.
|
2.64 score on scale
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
1.20 score on scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Before and after each chemotherapy session - 6 sessions between 6 weeks to 6 monthsPopulation: Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
For each of the other symptoms of the ESAS scale, : pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, lack of appetite, difficulty breathing, the average over 6 treatment sessions, the difference between the ESAS score associated with the symptom studied, obtained before and after each treatment session. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (SESA) is a 9-item symptom rating scale. The quote goes from 0 to 10. For symptoms assessed within the 1st secondary endpoint, the ESAS score correlates positively to symptom intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Without Art Therapy
n=36 Participants
6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments without art therapy with other supportive care added.
|
With Art Therapy
n=31 Participants
Art therapy as supportive care in 6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments with or without additional supportive care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average Over the 6 Treatment Sessions of the Difference Between ESAS Scores for Each One of the Other Symptoms, Measured Before and After Each Treatment Session
|
1.17 score on scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
0.67 score on scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 sessions between 6 weeks to 6 monthsPopulation: Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
To determine the impact of the 6 sessions of art therapy as supportive care to cancer treatments on the evolution of symptoms, by the ESAS scale, before the first session of art therapy, and after the last session (6th) The secondary judgment criterion 2 corresponds, for each of the ESAS symptoms, to the difference in ESAS score associated with the symptom studied, before the first and the last treatment session (6th). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (SESA) is a 9-item symptom rating scale. The quote goes from 0 to 10. Symptom intensity (0-10) and for well-being a score close to zero means a better result.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Without Art Therapy
n=36 Participants
6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments without art therapy with other supportive care added.
|
With Art Therapy
n=31 Participants
Art therapy as supportive care in 6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments with or without additional supportive care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in ESAS Scores for Each Symptom Between the First Treatment Session and the Last (6th) Session.
|
-0.28 score on scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
-0.26 score on scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 sessions between 6 weeks to 6 monthsPopulation: Between January 7, 2020, and March 17, 2025, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group.
Secondary endpoint 3 is the difference in total FACT-G quality of life score score between inclusion and the end of the 6 sessions of cancer treatment. This questionnaire contains 27 items constructed on a Likert scale with 5 coded response modes: 0 "Not at all" / 1 "A little" / 2 "Moderately" / 3 "A lot" / 4 "Enormously". A score is calculated by dimension ( physical, social, emotional and functional). These scores range from 0 to 28 where 0 represents a low level of well-being and 28 a high level of well-being. This score corresponds to the sum of the raw scores obtained for each dimension, and varies from 0 (low level) to 108 (good level of general well-being). Score global FACT-G (0-108)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Without Art Therapy
n=36 Participants
6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments without art therapy with other supportive care added.
|
With Art Therapy
n=31 Participants
Art therapy as supportive care in 6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments with or without additional supportive care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in the Total FACT-G Quality-of-life Score Between the First Session and the End of the 6 Anticancer Treatment Sessions.
|
-1.1 score on scale
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
5.7 score on scale
Standard Deviation 15.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: End of 6 session between 6 weeks to 6 monthsPopulation: Between Jan 7, 2020, and Mar 17, 2025, 86 patients were enrolled. Six patients did not receive any chemotherapy session (5 in the art therapy group and 1 in the control group), and 13 were excluded due to insufficient participation. This resulted in an analyzed population of 67 patients: 31 in the art therapy group and 36 in the control group Participants' satisfaction with art therapy and their perceived effects can only be assessed in the intervention group and not the control group.
Questionnaire (created by the principal investigator) designed to evaluate patient satisfaction, after 6 sessions of art therapy, on this type of therapy as supportive treatment in onco-therapy. It is composed of 5 questions relating to the feeling of art therapy sessions by the patient. They are rated from 0 to 5 (a better score is close to 5) in relation The secondary endpoint 4 is the satisfaction questionnaire for art therapy, performed only in patients in the therapy group by art.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Without Art Therapy
6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments without art therapy with other supportive care added.
|
With Art Therapy
n=31 Participants
Art therapy as supportive care in 6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments with or without additional supportive care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants' Satisfaction With Art Therapy as Well as Their Subjective Perception of the Effects Experienced During and After the Sessions
Feeling better thanks to art therapy
|
0 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Participants' Satisfaction With Art Therapy as Well as Their Subjective Perception of the Effects Experienced During and After the Sessions
Continue to perform art therapy at home
|
0 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
Adverse Events
With Art Therapy
Without Art Therapy
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place