A Clinical Investigation to Assess the Performance of a Polyurethane Condom Versus a Latex Condom in Healthy Monogamous Couples

NCT04134039 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 470

Last updated 2021-09-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This investigation is designed to evaluate the performance rate of a polyurethane (PU) condom versus a standard natural rubber latex (NRL) condom.

Conditions

  • Control of Pregnancy
  • Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Infections

Interventions

DEVICE

Polyurethane (PU) condom

A minimum of 5 condoms (maximum 7 condoms) of each condom type will be provided to couples to be used during vaginal intercourse over a 4 week period, the assessment period. Couples will repeat the assessment period each of the 2 condom types.

DEVICE

Natural Rubber Latex (NRL) condom

A minimum of 5 condoms (maximum 7 condoms) of each condom type will be provided to couples to be used during vaginal intercourse over a 4 week period, the assessment period. Couples will repeat the assessment period each of the 2 condom types.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Novotech (Australia) Pty Limited

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Unnop Jaisamrarn, MD · King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-02-09
Primary Completion
2021-07-05
Completion
2021-07-05

Countries

  • Thailand

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04134039 on ClinicalTrials.gov