Crestal vs Lateral Sinus Lift Augmentation

NCT04111250 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 15

Last updated 2019-10-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) of split-mouth design was to compare patient preference and effectiveness of two different techniques for lifting the maxillary sinus: the crestal approach versus the lateral window approach.

Conditions

  • Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
  • Bone Atrophy, Alveolar

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Maxillary sinus augmentation

Raise the sinus membrane to graft bone substitute to augment the sinus cavity allowing implants placement.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospital San Pietro Fatebenefratelli

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
100 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-11-01
Primary Completion
2018-03-30
Completion
2019-04-02

Countries

  • Albania

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04111250 on ClinicalTrials.gov