Trial Outcomes & Findings for First in Human Dose Escalation of M3258 as a Single Agent and Expansion Study of M3258 in Combination With Dexamethasone (NCT NCT04075721)
NCT ID: NCT04075721
Last Updated: 2023-03-24
Results Overview
DLT: any of adverse events (AEs), assessed by Investigator and/Sponsor at any dose, regimen, and judged not to be related to underlying disease/any previous/concomitant medication/concurrent condition during first cycle of study treatment. DLT was confirmed by Safety Monitoring Committee. DLTs: Grade (Gr) greater than/equal to (\>=) 3 nonhematologic AE with exception of: Single laboratory values out of abnormal range; Gr3 diarrhea persisting less than or equal to \[\<=\] 72 hour (hr); Nausea and vomiting \<= 72 hr; Transient Gr3 fatigue, local reactions, flu-like symptoms \<= 72 hr; Gr3 nonrecurrent skin toxicity; Asymptomatic Gr \>= 3 lipase/amylase elevation. Any Gr \>= 4 hematologic AE: Gr \>= 3 febrile neutropenia with Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) \<1000 per cube millimeter and temperature of \>38.3 Celsius (°C); Gr \>= 3 thrombocytopenia; Gr4 thrombocytopenia lasting \>7 days.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
10 participants
Day 1 up to Day 28
2023-03-24
Participant Flow
First participant signed informed consent: 26 September 2019, Last participant last visit: 01 April 2021.
This study was planned to be conducted in 2 parts; Part A: Dose escalation part and Part B: Dose expansion part. However, because of early discontinuation, only Part A was conducted; due to lack of participant enrollment before Part A reached its primary objective and before Part B was started.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis Set
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Pharmacodynamics (Pd) Analysis Set
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
First in Human Dose Escalation of M3258 as a Single Agent and Expansion Study of M3258 in Combination With Dexamethasone
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
Total
n=10 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 28Population: DLT analysis set: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and meet at least 1 of criteria specified in statistical analysis plan.
DLT: any of adverse events (AEs), assessed by Investigator and/Sponsor at any dose, regimen, and judged not to be related to underlying disease/any previous/concomitant medication/concurrent condition during first cycle of study treatment. DLT was confirmed by Safety Monitoring Committee. DLTs: Grade (Gr) greater than/equal to (\>=) 3 nonhematologic AE with exception of: Single laboratory values out of abnormal range; Gr3 diarrhea persisting less than or equal to \[\<=\] 72 hour (hr); Nausea and vomiting \<= 72 hr; Transient Gr3 fatigue, local reactions, flu-like symptoms \<= 72 hr; Gr3 nonrecurrent skin toxicity; Asymptomatic Gr \>= 3 lipase/amylase elevation. Any Gr \>= 4 hematologic AE: Gr \>= 3 febrile neutropenia with Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) \<1000 per cube millimeter and temperature of \>38.3 Celsius (°C); Gr \>= 3 thrombocytopenia; Gr4 thrombocytopenia lasting \>7 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=3 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) as Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 5.0
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
Adverse Event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: events that started from first dose of study intervention to 30 days after end of study intervention, or the cutoff date, whichever occurred first. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs (Serious AE: AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect) and non-serious TEAEs. TRAEs are defined as those AEs which are reasonably related to the study intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related Adverse Event (TRAEs)
Participants with TEAEs
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related Adverse Event (TRAEs)
Participants with TRAEs
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 29 up to 20.1 weeksPopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
Adverse Event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: events that started from first dose of study intervention to 30 days after end of study intervention, or the cutoff date, whichever occurred first. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs (Serious AE: AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect) and non-serious TEAEs. TRAEs are defined as those AEs which are reasonably related to the study intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) Outside of Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Period That Safety Monitoring Committee Deems Relevant for Determination of the Maximum Tolerated Dose
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose (Baseline), pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
12-lead ECG were recorded after the participants have rested for at least 15 minutes in supine position. Change from baseline in 12-Lead ECG findings that is QT interval - Fridericia's correction formula at pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=1 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=3 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=1 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings: QT Interval - Fridericia's Correction Formula
|
-10.0 milliseconds (msec)
Full Range -10 • Interval -10.0 to -10.0
|
6.3 milliseconds (msec)
Full Range -17 • Interval -17.0 to 45.0
|
6.0 milliseconds (msec)
Full Range 6 • Interval 6.0 to 6.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
ECOG performance status measured to assess participant's performance status on a scale of 0 to 5, where 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair for more than 50 percent of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5 = dead. ECOG performance status was reported in terms of number of participants with shifts in score from baseline value vs worst post-baseline value (that is \[i.e.\] highest score).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 1
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 0
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 1
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score
Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry, and coagulation. Number of participants with shifts from baseline (Grade \<3) to \>= Grade 3 were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, v5.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild, Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe. Grade 4: Life-threatening and Grade 5: Death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade Less Than (<) 3 in Clinical Laboratory Parameters to Grade Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3 on Treatment
Hematology
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade Less Than (<) 3 in Clinical Laboratory Parameters to Grade Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3 on Treatment
Chemistry
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade Less Than (<) 3 in Clinical Laboratory Parameters to Grade Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3 on Treatment
Coagulation
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
The number of participants with treatment-emergent changes from baseline in increased Body Temperature (degree Celsius \[°C\]) were reported by using criteria: Baseline temperature (temp.) less than (\<) 37°C, on treatment change \<1°C, 1 - \<2°C, 2 - \<3°C and greater than or equal to (\>=)3°C; Baseline temp. 37 - \<38°C, on treatment change \<1°C, 1 - \<2°C, 2 - \<3°C and \>=3°C; Baseline temp. 38 - \<39°C, on treatment change \<1°C, 1 - \<2°C, 2 - \<3°C and \>=3°C; Baseline temp. 39-\<40°C, on treatment change \<1°C, 1 - \<2°C, 2 - \<3°C and \>=3°C; Baseline temp. \>=40°C, on treatment change \<1°C, 1 - \<2°C, 2 - \<3°C and \>=3°C.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. <37°C, on treatment change <1°C
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp.<37°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°C
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. <37°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. <37°C, on treatment change >=3°C
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change <1°C
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change >=3°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change <1°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change >=3°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change <1°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change >=3°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change <1°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase
Baseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change >=3°C
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
The number of participants with treatment-emergent changes from baseline (BS) in Increase (Ic.)/Decrease (Dc.) Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (millimeter of mercury \[mmHg\]) were reported by using criteria: Ic./Dc. BS SBP/DBP \<140/\<90 mmHg, on maximal treatment (TR) change =\<20 mmHg, \>20 - =\<40 mmHg and \>40 mmHg; Ic./Dc. BS SBP/DBP \>=140/\>=90 mmHg, on maximal TR change =\<20 mmHg, \>20 - =\<40 mmHg and \>40 mmHg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg,on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
The number of participants with treatment-emergent changes from baseline in Increase (Ic.)/Decrease (Dc.) maximal Respiration Rate (RR) were reported by using criteria: Ic./Dc. BS RR \<20 breaths per minute (breaths/min), on TR change (ch) =\<5 breaths/min, \>5 - =\<10 breaths/min and \>10 breaths/min. Ic./Dc. BS RR \>=20 breaths/min, on TR ch =\<5 breaths/min, \>5 - =\<10 breaths/min and \>10 breaths/min.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/min
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Ic.BS RR<20 breaths/min, on TR Ch >5 - = <10 breaths/min
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/min
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/min
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
IC.BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >5 - =<10 breaths/min
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Ic. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/min
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/min
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR Ch >5 - =<10 breaths/min
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/min
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/min
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Dc.BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >5 - =<10 breaths/min
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease
Dc. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/min
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants, who received at least one dose of study intervention, have no clinically important protocol deviations or important events affecting PK, and provide at least one measurable post-dose concentration. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. Single dose PK data on Day 1 were summarized by dose level, such that all 10 mg arms were combined as descriptive statistics of PK were only calculated for N greater than (\>) 2 in which a measurement of greater than (\>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) represents a valid measurement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=5 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=3 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Single Dose: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M3258
|
153 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Interval 151.0 to 156.0
|
215 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Interval 206.0 to 223.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8 or Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants, who received at least one dose of study intervention, have no clinically important protocol deviations or important events affecting PK, and provide at least one measurable post-dose concentration. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=1 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=3 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=3 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Mutilple Dose: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M3258
|
NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Based on pre-specified criteria Geometric Mean and 95% Confidence Interval were not calculated if fewer than 2 participants have reportable parameter values.
|
213 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Interval 208.0 to 217.0
|
511 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Interval 507.0 to 516.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: PK analysis set included all participants, who received at least one dose of study intervention, have no clinically important protocol deviations or important events affecting PK, and provide at least one measurable post-dose concentration. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). AUC0-t was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule. Single dose PK data on Day 1 were summarized by dose level, such that all 10 mg arms were combined as descriptive statistics of PK were only calculated for N greater than (\>) 2 in which a measurement of greater than (\>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) represents a valid measurement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=5 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=3 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Single Dose: Area Under Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-t) of M3258
|
2000 hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Interval 2000.0 to 2010.0
|
3300 hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Interval 3300.0 to 3310.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: The most participants who had evaluable PK, samples at 24 hour (Day 2) were collected. Therefore, the AUC0-t and AUC0-24 would not differ and AUC0-24 at single dose was not reported. It was also planned to carry the trough value at steady state for QD dosing forward and impute it as trough value at 24 hours. Due to the change from the QD to twice per week dosing this did not apply anymore and AUC0-24 at steady state was not calculated.
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to 24 hours post dosing for M3258. Single dose PK data on Day 1 were summarized by dose level, such that all 10 mg arms were combined as descriptive statistics of PK were only calculated for N greater than (\>) 2 in which a measurement of greater than (\>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) represents a valid measurement.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8 or Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: The most participants who had evaluable PK, samples at 24 hour (Day 2) were collected. Therefore, the AUC0-t and AUC0-24 would not differ and AUC0-24 at single dose was not reported. It was also planned to carry the trough value at steady state for QD dosing forward and impute it as trough value at 24 hours. Due to the change from the QD to twice per week dosing this did not apply anymore and AUC0-24 at steady state was not calculated.
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to 24 hours post dosing for M3258.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose), 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: The Pharmacodynamic (Pd) population included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention, had no clinically important protocol deviations or important events affecting Pd, and provide at least one measurable Pd endpoint post-dose. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.
Ratio to baseline was calculated dividing post-baseline measurements by the baseline measurement. Single dose Pd data on Day 1 were summarized by dose level, such that all 10 mg arms were combined as descriptive statistics of PK were only calculated for N greater than (\>) 2 in which a measurement of greater than (\>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) represents a valid measurement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=3 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Single Dose: Ratio to Baseline in Large Multifunctional Protease 7 (LMP7) Activity at Cycle 1 Day 1
Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 hours post-dose
|
0.308 ratio
Interval 0.21 to 0.41
|
0.370 ratio
Interval 0.31 to 0.43
|
—
|
|
Part A: Single Dose: Ratio to Baseline in Large Multifunctional Protease 7 (LMP7) Activity at Cycle 1 Day 1
Cycle 1 Day 1: 6 hours post-dose
|
0.337 ratio
Interval 0.2 to 0.55
|
0.178 ratio
Interval 0.15 to 0.21
|
—
|
|
Part A: Single Dose: Ratio to Baseline in Large Multifunctional Protease 7 (LMP7) Activity at Cycle 1 Day 1
Cycle 1 Day 1: 24 hours post-dose
|
0.387 ratio
Interval 0.25 to 0.53
|
0.262 ratio
Interval 0.16 to 0.36
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose (Baseline), Pre-dose, 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15) (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: The Pd population included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention, had no clinically important protocol deviations or important events affecting Pd, and provide at least one measurable Pd endpoint post-dose. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.
Ratio to baseline was calculated dividing post-baseline measurements by the baseline measurement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=1 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Multiple Dose: Ratio to Baseline in Large Multifunctional Protease 7 (LMP7) Activity at Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15)
Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): Pre-dose
|
0.26 ratio
Interval 0.26 to 0.26
|
0.364 ratio
Interval 0.36 to 0.37
|
0.31 ratio
Interval 0.31 to 0.31
|
|
Part A: Multiple Dose: Ratio to Baseline in Large Multifunctional Protease 7 (LMP7) Activity at Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15)
Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): 2 hours post-dose
|
0.25 ratio
Interval 0.25 to 0.25
|
0.202 ratio
Interval 0.17 to 0.24
|
0.299 ratio
Interval 0.16 to 0.44
|
|
Part A: Multiple Dose: Ratio to Baseline in Large Multifunctional Protease 7 (LMP7) Activity at Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15)
Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): 6 hours post-dose
|
—
|
0.178 ratio
Interval 0.17 to 0.19
|
0.22 ratio
Interval 0.22 to 0.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the trial medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in serum monoclonal (M)-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=1 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=3 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Serum Monoclonal (M)-Protein Level Measured Using Electrophoresis
Cycle 2 Day 1
|
—
|
-0.113 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
Interval -0.21 to -0.05
|
0.000 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Serum Monoclonal (M)-Protein Level Measured Using Electrophoresis
Cycle 3 Day 1
|
—
|
0.107 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
Interval -0.14 to 0.36
|
0.100 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
Interval 0.1 to 0.1
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Serum Monoclonal (M)-Protein Level Measured Using Electrophoresis
Cycle 4 Day 1
|
—
|
0.050 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
Interval -0.08 to 0.23
|
—
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Serum Monoclonal (M)-Protein Level Measured Using Electrophoresis
Cycle 6 Day 1
|
—
|
0.100 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
Interval 0.1 to 0.1
|
—
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Serum Monoclonal (M)-Protein Level Measured Using Electrophoresis
End of Study Intervention
|
0.100 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
Interval 0.1 to 0.1
|
0.678 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
Interval 0.27 to 1.68
|
1.223 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
Interval 0.68 to 1.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the trial medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints. None of the participants were analyzed in M3258 10 mg QD arm at specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in urine M-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=1 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Urine M-protein Level Using Electrophoresis
Cycle 2 Day 1
|
—
|
25.25 milligrams per day (mg/day)
Interval -59.5 to 110.0
|
26.50 milligrams per day (mg/day)
Interval 26.5 to 26.5
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Urine M-protein Level Using Electrophoresis
Cycle 3 Day 1
|
—
|
256.00 milligrams per day (mg/day)
Interval 256.0 to 256.0
|
67.00 milligrams per day (mg/day)
Interval 67.0 to 67.0
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Urine M-protein Level Using Electrophoresis
Cycle 4 Day 1
|
—
|
-130.00 milligrams per day (mg/day)
Interval -130.0 to 130.0
|
—
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Urine M-protein Level Using Electrophoresis
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
—
|
268.00 milligrams per day (mg/day)
Interval 268.0 to 268.0
|
—
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Urine M-protein Level Using Electrophoresis
Cycle 6 Day 1
|
—
|
3320.00 milligrams per day (mg/day)
Interval 3320.0 to 3320.0
|
—
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Urine M-protein Level Using Electrophoresis
End of Study Intervention
|
—
|
610.50 milligrams per day (mg/day)
Interval 51.0 to 1170.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the trial medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in free light chain ratio was reported at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=1 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=1 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Free Light Chain Ratio
Cycle 2 Day 1
|
0.000 ratio
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.000 ratio
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.000 ratio
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Free Light Chain Ratio
Cycle 3 Day 1
|
—
|
0.000 ratio
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0.010 ratio
Interval 0.01 to 0.01
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Free Light Chain Ratio
Cycle 4 Day 1
|
—
|
0.000 ratio
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
—
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Free Light Chain Ratio
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
—
|
0.000 ratio
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
—
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Free Light Chain Ratio
Cycle 6 Day 1
|
—
|
-0.010 ratio
Interval -0.01 to -0.01
|
—
|
|
Part A: Change From Baseline in Free Light Chain Ratio
End of Study Intervention
|
-0.005 ratio
Interval -0.01 to 0.0
|
-0.010 ratio
Interval -0.01 to -0.01
|
0.000 ratio
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from first dose of study treatment up to 18.2 monthsPopulation: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the trial medication.
OR is defined as a best overall response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the IMWG Criteria: sCR: CR (negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow); normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/\>= 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level \< 100 mg/24 hours; PR: \>= 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by \>= 90%/to \< 200 mg/24 hours. In addition to the above, if present at baseline a \>= 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 Participants
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR) as Assessed by Investigator Using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria
Stringent Complete Response
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR) as Assessed by Investigator Using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria
Complete Response
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR) as Assessed by Investigator Using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria
Very good Partial Response
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Part A: Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR) as Assessed by Investigator Using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria
Partial Response
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from first documentation of objective response until date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 18.2 monthsPopulation: Data could not be calculated as none of the participants showed objective response.
DOR was defined participants with confirmed response, as time from first documentation of objective response (Complete Response \[CR\] or Partial Response \[PR\]) to date of first documentation of progression disease (PD)/death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PR: \>= 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by \>= 90%/to \< 200 mg/24 hours. In addition to the above, if present at baseline a \>= 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. PD: \>= 25% increase from lowest response value in serum. Development of new or increased size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. Hypercalcemia attributed to the plasma cell proliferative disorder.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from the first dose of study treatment up to documentation of first response, assessed up to 18.2 monthsPopulation: Data could not be calculated as none of the participants showed response.
Time to response was defined as the time from the first dose of M3258 to the documentation of first response (Complete Response \[CR\] or Partial Response \[PR\]). CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PR: \>= 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by \>= 90% or to \< 200 mg/24 hours. In addition to the above, if present at baseline a \>= 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
M3258 10 mg QD
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 participants at risk
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 participants at risk
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 participants at risk
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pathological fracture
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic pain
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Toxic skin eruption
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Orchitis
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord compression
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
M3258 10 mg QD
n=2 participants at risk
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg) orally, once daily (QD) until disease progression.
|
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 participants at risk
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 10 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week
n=4 participants at risk
Participants received M3258 at a dose of 20 mg orally, twice per week on Day 1 and Day 4 until disease progression.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus arrhythmia
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear congestion
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Eye disorders
Periorbital oedema
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous floaters
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
100.0%
2/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
100.0%
2/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash pruritic
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
50.0%
1/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Odynophagia
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Escherichia urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haematoma
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Tumour lysis syndrome
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D deficiency
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis of jaw
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pathological fracture
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pelvic pain
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lower respiratory tract congestion
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal oedema
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/2 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Time from first treatment up to final assessment at 18.2 months
Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of the study medication.
|
Additional Information
Communication Center
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place