Comparing Pediatric Dental Oral Sedation Outcomes With and Without Meperidine in Children Aged 3-7 Years
NCT04068948 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 37
Last updated 2024-01-24
Summary
The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to assess the effects of oral sedation using midazolam and hydroxyzine with and without meperidine (a narcotic) on sedation outcomes in pediatric dental patients undergoing dental treatment at the University of Washington Center for Pediatric Dentistry. Procedural sedation can be offered as an option for dental treatment for a young, potentially uncooperative pediatric patient to safely and effectively complete dental restorative needs. Both sedation regimens are already regularly used for patients at the UW CPD. The goal of this study is to assess if removing a narcotic from the regimen will produce the same behavioral success outcomes as a regimen with a narcotic. Our hypothesis is that patients who receive oral sedation using midazolam, hydroxyzine, and meperidine will experience fewer behavioral failures than those who receive oral sedation using midazolam and hydroxyzine without meperidine.
The secondary objective of this project is to evaluate the relationship between child temperament and sedation outcome in each treatment group.
Conditions
- Dental Caries in Children
- Pediatric Dental Sedation
- Meperidine
- Hydroxyzine
- Midazolam
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Meperidine
This intervention assesses a child's behavioral outcome for dental procedural sedation in combination with midazolam and hydroxyzine. Children participating in the study will randomly be assigned to receive either a drug regimen of midazolam+hydroxyzine, or midazolam+hydroxyzine+meperidine.
- DRUG
-
Hydroxyzine
This intervention is given to children for a sedative effect. Children participating in the study will randomly be assigned to receive either a drug regimen of midazolam+hydroxyzine, or midazolam+hydroxyzine+meperidine.
- DRUG
-
Midazolam
This intervention is given to children for a sedative effect. Children participating in the study will randomly be assigned to receive either a drug regimen of midazolam+hydroxyzine, or midazolam+hydroxyzine+meperidine.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Travis M Nelson, DDS · University of Washington
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 3 Years
- Max Age
- 7 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-06-25
- Primary Completion
- 2022-12-31
- Completion
- 2023-01-31
- FDA Drug
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Premedication in Children
NCT02250703 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effects of Oral Midazolam in Comparison Promethazine With Nitrous Oxide for Uncooperative Children
NCT01118884 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Remimazolam Tosilate Sedation and Midazolam Sedation in Dental Patients
NCT04602845 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Nasal Versus Oral Midazolam Sedation in Routine Pediatric Dental Care
NCT02679781 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Nebulized Fentanyl, Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine as a Premedication in Pediatric Dental Surgeries
NCT04226885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dexmedetomidine Versus Pentobarbital for Pediatric Procedural Sedation
NCT00878345 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of Oral Midazolam Combined With Esketamine Administered Intranasally for Pediatric Preoperative Sedation
NCT05925283 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine
NCT02985697 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam Versus a Combination of the Two as a Premedication for Children Undergoing Bilateral Myringotomy Tube Insertion
NCT02134327 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dexmedetomidine Sedation With Third Molar Surgery
NCT01017237 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Deep-sedated Pediatric Dental Patients
NCT04509414 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Oral Dexmedetomidine vs Midazoam For Premedication
NCT03357718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sublingual Versus Intranasal Administration of Dexmedetomidine for Sedation of Children Undergoing Dental Treatment
NCT04237532 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Propofol vs. Nasal Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Agitation and Delirium
NCT06466915 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effect of Midazolam on White-coat Hypertensive Dental Patients
NCT01528371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing in Dexmedetomidine With po/pr Midazolam for Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department
NCT03399838 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Oral Propranolol for Reducing Pediatric Dental Patients Anxiety
NCT03388957 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
IN Midazolam vs IN Dexmedetomidine vs IN Ketamine During Minimal Procedures in Pediatric ED
NCT05934669 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Intravenous Anesthetic Requirements for Children Undergoing Dental Procedures
NCT03422978 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
a Phase III Trial of Safety and Efficacy of Premedication With Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Pediatric Patients
NCT04356638 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Emergence Agitation in Children With or Without Tube Insertion Under General Anesthesia
NCT01535287 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Intranasal Remimazolam for Premedication in Pediatric Patient
NCT04720963 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Dexmedetomidine as a Sole Premedication for BMT Placement
NCT05903326 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Interactive Tablet Compared to Oral Midazolam as Premedication in Preoperative Anxiety in Children
NCT04049201 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dexmedetomidine vs Fentanyl for BMT
NCT00654329 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4