Trial Outcomes & Findings for Bispectral Index: A Comparison of Bifrontal Montage Agreement (NCT NCT04062240)
NCT ID: NCT04062240
Last Updated: 2023-02-21
Results Overview
Degree of variability between the values produced by the BIS sensors in a bifrontal montage when monitored simultaneously by use of a Bland-Altmann plot. The average value of each timed pair was plotted against the difference between the pairs. The BIS monitor outputs data on a scale of 0-100 in arbitrary units; 0 = an isoelectric state on EEG, 100 = fully awake patient. BIS values of 40-60 are thought to reduce the chance of patient recall during general anesthesia. For the purpose of this study, a smaller confidence interval is better as it indicates a higher level of agreement between the two BIS sensors.
COMPLETED
15 participants
10 minutes where both sensors are recording concurrently
2023-02-21
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Additional Bispectral Index (BIS) Sensor
Many providers caring for cardiovascular surgical patients utilizes BIS monitoring to gauge depth of anesthesia. The current practice involves placement of the BIS sensor on the patient's forehead per the manufacturer's recommendation on arrival to the operating room. The intervention in this study will add an additional BIS sensor to the patient's forehead. After syncing the two monitors for time, and ensuring appropriate skin contact and signal quality of both sensors, BIS monitoring will commence. BIS readings will be available every 12 seconds during the duration of the study, yielding up to 240 points of comparison per enrolled patient.
BIS sensor: BIS sensors will be labeled L and R. The degree of variability between the concurrent use of the sensors will be assessed .
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Additional Bispectral Index (BIS) Sensor
Many providers caring for cardiovascular surgical patients utilizes BIS monitoring to gauge depth of anesthesia. The current practice involves placement of the BIS sensor on the patient's forehead per the manufacturer's recommendation on arrival to the operating room. The intervention in this study will add an additional BIS sensor to the patient's forehead. After syncing the two monitors for time, and ensuring appropriate skin contact and signal quality of both sensors, BIS monitoring will commence. BIS readings will be available every 12 seconds during the duration of the study, yielding up to 240 points of comparison per enrolled patient.
BIS sensor: BIS sensors will be labeled L and R. The degree of variability between the concurrent use of the sensors will be assessed .
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
equipment malfunction
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Additional BIS Sensor
n=15 Participants
Many providers caring for cardiovascular surgical patients utilizes BIS monitoring to gauge depth of anesthesia. The current practice involves placement of the BIS sensor on the patient's forehead per the manufacturer's recommendation on arrival to the operating room. The intervention in this study will add an additional BIS sensor to the patient's forehead. After syncing the two monitors for time, and ensuring appropriate skin contact and signal quality of both sensors, BIS monitoring will commence. BIS readings will be available every 12 seconds during the duration of the study, yielding up to 240 points of comparison per enrolled patient.
BIS sensor: BIS sensors will be labeled L and R. The degree of variability between the concurrent use of the sensors will be assessed .
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
10 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
5 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 minutes where both sensors are recording concurrentlyDegree of variability between the values produced by the BIS sensors in a bifrontal montage when monitored simultaneously by use of a Bland-Altmann plot. The average value of each timed pair was plotted against the difference between the pairs. The BIS monitor outputs data on a scale of 0-100 in arbitrary units; 0 = an isoelectric state on EEG, 100 = fully awake patient. BIS values of 40-60 are thought to reduce the chance of patient recall during general anesthesia. For the purpose of this study, a smaller confidence interval is better as it indicates a higher level of agreement between the two BIS sensors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Additional BIS Sensor
n=14 Participants
Many providers caring for cardiovascular surgical patients utilizes BIS monitoring to gauge depth of anesthesia. The current practice involves placement of the BIS sensor on the patient's forehead per the manufacturer's recommendation on arrival to the operating room. The intervention in this study will add an additional BIS sensor to the patient's forehead. After syncing the two monitors for time, and ensuring appropriate skin contact and signal quality of both sensors, BIS monitoring will commence. BIS readings will be available every 12 seconds during the duration of the study, yielding up to 240 points of comparison per enrolled patient.
BIS sensor: BIS sensors will be labeled L and R. The degree of variability between the concurrent use of the sensors will be assessed .
|
|---|---|
|
BIS Montage
|
0.01 units on a scale
Interval -8.01 to 8.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 minutes where both sensors are recording concurrentlyPopulation: Due to the inconsistent usage and dosages of ketamine administered to the study population, no data was collected to examine this secondary measure.
Degree to which Ketamine may influence BIS values
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Additional BIS Sensor
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place