Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Medical Compression Bandage Application Techniques by Measuring Interface Pressures Depending on Whether or Not the Heel is Included in Patients With Open Venous Ulcers (NCT NCT04046120)

NCT ID: NCT04046120

Last Updated: 2026-03-19

Results Overview

Compare the interface pressure measurements generated by a medical compression bandage between two groups of patients with open venous ulcer(s) : * experimental group: uncovered heel * control group: heel covered by the bandage.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

102 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At V3 (i.e. between 4 to 8 weeks): 48h after the final bandagin (which occurs at V2)

Results posted on

2026-03-19

Participant Flow

24 months of recruiting in hospital Each participant was followed between 4 to 6 weeks Recruitment began on the first inclusion : 10/11/2019 and the research ended with the last visite of the last patient on 06/03/2022. This study was designed as a monocentric, prospective, controlled, randomized in parallel groups, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Eligible according to the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Heel Included
The bandage is made by including the heel as recommended in routine.
Heel Not Included
he bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered. Heel-free bandage: The bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered.
Overall Study
STARTED
51
51
Overall Study
COMPLETED
43
42
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
8
9

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Heel Included
The bandage is made by including the heel as recommended in routine.
Heel Not Included
he bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered. Heel-free bandage: The bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered.
Overall Study
Wounds healed before the end of follow-up
3
2
Overall Study
Patient hospitalized
0
1
Overall Study
Death
0
1
Overall Study
Change of arm after randomization
1
1
Overall Study
Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol:
0
1
Overall Study
Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage
2
1
Overall Study
Bandage redone between V2 and V3
1
0
Overall Study
Postponed visit- COVID
1
2

Baseline Characteristics

The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: * Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients * Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients * Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients * Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients * Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient * Patient hospitalized: 1 patient * Death: 1 patient * Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Heel Included
n=51 Participants
The bandage is made by including the heel as recommended in routine.
Heel Not Included
n=51 Participants
he bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered. Heel-free bandage: The bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered.
Total
n=102 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
41 Participants
n=51 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: * Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients * Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients * Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients * Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients * Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient * Patient hospitalized: 1 patient * Death: 1 patient * Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
44 Participants
n=51 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: * Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients * Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients * Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients * Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients * Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient * Patient hospitalized: 1 patient * Death: 1 patient * Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
85 Participants
n=102 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: * Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients * Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients * Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients * Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients * Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient * Patient hospitalized: 1 patient * Death: 1 patient * Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
Age, Continuous
74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4 • n=51 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient Patient hospitalized: 1 patient Death: 1 patient Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
77.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=51 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient Patient hospitalized: 1 patient Death: 1 patient Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
76.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=102 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient Patient hospitalized: 1 patient Death: 1 patient Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
n=51 Participants
32 Participants
n=51 Participants
49 Participants
n=102 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants
n=51 Participants
19 Participants
n=51 Participants
53 Participants
n=102 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
France
51 Participants
n=51 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient Patient hospitalized: 1 patient Death: 1 patient Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
51 Participants
n=51 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient Patient hospitalized: 1 patient Death: 1 patient Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
102 Participants
n=102 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient Patient hospitalized: 1 patient Death: 1 patient Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: * Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients * Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients * Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients * Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients * Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient * Patient hospitalized: 1 patient * Death: 1 patient * Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
0 Participants
n=51 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: * Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients * Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients * Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients * Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients * Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient * Patient hospitalized: 1 patient * Death: 1 patient * Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
0 Participants
n=102 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: * Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients * Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients * Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients * Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients * Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient * Patient hospitalized: 1 patient * Death: 1 patient * Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants
n=51 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: * Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients * Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients * Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients * Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients * Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient * Patient hospitalized: 1 patient * Death: 1 patient * Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
7 Participants
n=51 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: * Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients * Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients * Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients * Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients * Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient * Patient hospitalized: 1 patient * Death: 1 patient * Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient
17 Participants
n=102 Participants • The per-protocol population included 85 patients. Reasons for exclusion of the 17 patients below: * Wounds healed before the end of follow-up: 5 patients * Postponed visit - COVID: 3 patients * Discontinuation of the study due to inability to tolerate the bandage: 3 patients * Change of arm after randomization: 2 patients * Refusal by the nursing home to carry out the protocol: 1 patient * Patient hospitalized: 1 patient * Death: 1 patient * Bandage redone between V2 and V3: 1 patient

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At V3 (i.e. between 4 to 8 weeks): 48h after the final bandagin (which occurs at V2)

Compare the interface pressure measurements generated by a medical compression bandage between two groups of patients with open venous ulcer(s) : * experimental group: uncovered heel * control group: heel covered by the bandage.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Heel Included
n=43 Participants
The bandage is made by including the heel as recommended in routine.
Heel Not Included
n=42 Participants
he bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered. Heel-free bandage: The bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered.
Interface Pressure at V3
28.4 mmHg
Interval 26.2 to 30.5
30.1 mmHg
Interval 28.0 to 32.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 0 and the last day at V3 (between week 4 and week 8)

Compare the evolution or appearance of an edema in the ankle. The circumference of the ankle is measured with a tape measure using a technique called the figure of 8.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Heel Included
n=43 Participants
The bandage is made by including the heel as recommended in routine.
Heel Not Included
n=42 Participants
he bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered. Heel-free bandage: The bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered.
Ankle Circumference
62.4 cm
Interval 60.9 to 63.9
58.9 cm
Interval 57.4 to 60.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 48 hours before the last visit of the protocol V3 (V3 which occurs between 4 to 8 weeks)

Compare, between the two groups, the interface pressures measured during the installation of bandage at home by the home nurse (V2 follow-up visit), compared to the recommended pressures (30-40 mmHg)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Heel Included
n=43 Participants
The bandage is made by including the heel as recommended in routine.
Heel Not Included
n=42 Participants
he bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered. Heel-free bandage: The bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered.
Interface Pressure at V2
36.4 mmHg
Interval 34.6 to 38.2
39.7 mmHg
Interval 37.9 to 41.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At V2 and at V3, 48 hours apart (V3 which occurs between 4 to 8 weeks)

Compare, between the two groups, the evolution of interface pressures after 48 hours of bandage wear.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Heel Included
n=43 Participants
The bandage is made by including the heel as recommended in routine.
Heel Not Included
n=42 Participants
he bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered. Heel-free bandage: The bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered.
Interface Pressure Between V2 and V3
-8 mmHg
Interval -9.8 to -6.2
-9.7 mmHg
Interval -11.5 to -7.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At the last visit of the protocol (Between 4 and 8 weeks)

Between the two groups, compare patient satisfaction with a heterogeneous questionnaire. There is no scale or score. It is asked which type of bandage the patient prefers: with or without heel included?

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Heel Included
n=43 Participants
The bandage is made by including the heel as recommended in routine.
Heel Not Included
n=42 Participants
he bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered. Heel-free bandage: The bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered.
Patient Satisfaction: Questionnaire
Among the patients who have experienced the two technics "I prefer the heel-wrapped technique"
8 Participants
6 Participants
Patient Satisfaction: Questionnaire
Among the patients who have experienced the two technics 'I don't know'
2 Participants
9 Participants
Patient Satisfaction: Questionnaire
Among the patients who have experienced the two technics"I prefer the heel-free technic"
3 Participants
20 Participants
Patient Satisfaction: Questionnaire
Missing data
30 Participants
7 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 0

Evaluate the number of bandage repairs required to reach the recommended therapeutic pressure

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Heel Included
n=43 Participants
The bandage is made by including the heel as recommended in routine.
Heel Not Included
n=42 Participants
he bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered. Heel-free bandage: The bandage is made by leaving the heel uncovered.
Number of Bandage Repairs
one bandage repair
37 Participants
30 Participants
Number of Bandage Repairs
2 bandage repair
5 Participants
12 Participants
Number of Bandage Repairs
3 bandage repair
1 Participants
0 Participants

Adverse Events

Heel Included

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Heel Not Included

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Madam Anne MAUVILAIN-POTTIER

CHU of Nantes - Mobile vascular wound care unit

Phone: 0240083473

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place