MedTrace Logo

Hysteroscopic Versus Laparoscopic Tubal Occlusion in Cases of Hydrosalpinx and Planning for IVF

NCT04037813 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 108

Last updated 2022-02-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

compare the efficacy of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic tubal occlusion for the patients of communicating hydrosalpinx scheduled for IVF. half of the patients will undergo hysteroscopic tubal occlusion while the other half will undergo laparoscopic tubal occlusion.

Conditions

  • Tubal Obstruction

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic and hysteroscopic tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinx

For hysteroscopic tubal occlusion group it will be done under general anesthesia using standard, rigid 4-mm hysteroscopy with a 30° forward-oblique lens and a 5.5-mm diagnostic sheath (Karl Storz , Germany). Uterine distension allowed a panoramic view of the uterine cavity and identification of the tubal ostia.The roller ball (Ball Electrode, unipolar, 5 Fr) will be used for the coagulation of the interstitial part of the tube and the uterine cornu area. For laparoscopic tubal occlusion group it will be done under general anesthesia using bipolar coagulation and a proximal tubal cut.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mahmoud A Abdelsalam, Msc · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-08-15
Primary Completion
2020-08-15
Completion
2020-09-15

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04037813 on ClinicalTrials.gov