MedTrace Logo

The Effect of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion on Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients

NCT04010032 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2019-12-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a programmed intermittent bolus injection method compared to conventional continuous infusion in the management of epidural analgesia in pediatric patients correctional osteotomy. As a prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial, the investigators compare the quality of pain control after surgery.

Conditions

  • Correctional Osteotomy

Interventions

DEVICE

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus

bolus administration of 0.15 ml of ropivacaine 0.15 ml / kg into epidural space every hour(intermittent bolus injection) using PCA device

DEVICE

Continuous epidural infusion

Continuous infusion of 0.15% ropivacaine 0.15 ml / kg / h into the epidural space using PCA device using PCA device

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Yonsei University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
4 Years
Max Age
13 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-01-31
Primary Completion
2021-06-30
Completion
2021-06-30

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04010032 on ClinicalTrials.gov