Effectiveness of Adductor Canal Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine
NCT04003506 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2023-12-01
Summary
With aging of population, osteoarthritis of knees and hips become major orthopaedic problems in Hong Kong. Osteoarthritis of knees and hips are associated with significant pain problem and functional disability. Total joints replacement is the ultimate surgical procedures to deal with such problems.
However total joints replacement is associated with significant tissue damage and post-operative pain problems, which would affect post-operative recovery and rehabilitation.
The primary aims of total knee replacement are improvement in functional activities and reduce pain due to degenerated knee joints. However, there are around 20-30% of patients would develop significant pain problem despite uncomplicated total knee replacement. It accounts for major post-operative problems and burdens.
Procedure specific analgesic method with multi-model analgesia technique is well-known to be useful in post-operative pain management, which reduces the post-operative pain score. However, despite using of multi-modal analgesic technique, pain after total joint replacement is still the most unsolved issue. It prolongs the recovery period and increases post-operative analgesic consumptions.
Multimodal analgesia, including periarticular local infiltration of analgesia (LIA), regional nerve block, opioid and non-opioid have been shown to be effective in managing postoperative pain.
Periarticular LIA has been shown to be an effective way of pain management. Regional nerve block using femoral nerve block or adductor canal block (ACB) is also a well-established anlagesic technique after total knee replacement. Comparing with femoral nerve block, it involves more sensory blockade so has the advantage of quadriceps sparing, less affecting the post-operative mobilization.
From most recent systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials, it becomes clear that periarticular LIA has better pain control with less opioid consumption than ACB alone. However, duration of a single-dose LIA may not be long enough after total knee replacement. Recent meta-analysis has shown that combined ACB with LIA could significantly reduce pain scores and morphine consumption compared LIA alone after TKA. Standard bupivacaine, levobupivocaine, ropivocaine were used in ACB in these studies. They are local anaesthetic with half-life ranging from 3-6 hours.
With the availability of liposomal bupivacaine (LB), ACB using LB may further prolong the analgesic effect of ACB as the therapeutic levels of bupivacaine, which are below the toxic range and sustained for 72 hours after injection. Therefore, the issue is whether ACB using LB has even longer analgesic effect than plain bupivacaine or ropivacaine. There was only one study directly compared ACB using LB and 0.1% ropivociane infusion. It was shown that LB had significant impact in pain control in the first 36 hours. However, this was a retrospective study and there was difference in delivery of local anaesthetics (single shot injection for liposomal bupivacaine but continuous infusion for ropivacaine).
The primary aim of this study is to investigate whether ACB using liposomal bupivacaine has even longer analgesic effect than standard bupivacaine (SB) and its cost effectiveness. Secondary aims are to evaluate the pharmacokinetic data of standard bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine in adductor canal block and pharmacokinetic data of ropivocaine level in LIA.
Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Liposomal bupivacaine
LIA with ACB will be given using 10ml of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine + 10ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine
- DRUG
-
Bupivacaine Injection
LIA with ACB will be given using 20ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The University of Hong Kong
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Chi Wing Chan, MBBS · Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-10-31
- Completion
- 2026-10-31
- FDA Drug
- Yes
Countries
- Hong Kong
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Adductor Canal Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Analgesia Post Total Knee Arthroscopy
NCT02033603 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Two Different Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04286035 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Adductor Canal Block Versus Intra-articular Steroid and Lignocaine in Knee Osteoarthritis Pain Management
NCT04264481 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Direct vs Postoperative Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Nerve Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03733509 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05715437 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Replacement
NCT02100579 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Epidural Catheter With or Without Adductor Canal Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02121392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Versus Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03145584 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intra-articular Analgesia Versus Adductor Canal Block for Arthroscopic Knee Surgery
NCT05004506 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Two Different Regional Analgesia Techniques for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06179641 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Different Bupivacaine Volumes in Infiltration Between Popliteal Artery and Capsule of Knee Block
NCT05438992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Femoral Nerve Catheter and Adductor Canal Block With Steroid Adjuvant in Total Knee Replacement (TKR)
NCT01973530 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Multimodal Drug Infiltration in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is Posterior Capsular Infiltration Worth the Risk?
NCT02860949 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Epidural Analgesia vs Adductor Canal Block in Bilateral TKA
NCT03205540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Low vs Standard Local Anesthetics Boluses for Continuous Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06179628 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02453360 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Control After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Benefit In Adding Single Shot Adductor Canal Block to Existing Pain Regimen Protocol?
NCT02740192 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Adductor Canal Block and Recovery After Total Knee Replacement Surgery
NCT02411149 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Continuous Infusion and Intermittent Bolus Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05518513 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Adductor Canal Block for Medial Compartment Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01818531 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of the Minimum Effective Concentration of Bupivacaine (EC50) in Femoral Block for Analgesia by Ultrasound After Knee Surgery
NCT02124005 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Adductor Canal Block and Arthroscopic Knee Surgery, High Pain Responders
NCT02001662 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Systemic Lidocaine Versus Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04828083 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Single-injection Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia
NCT04400708 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy Between Adductor Canal Block + IPACK Block and Adductor Canal Block + Genicular Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07324486 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA