MedTrace Logo

Effect of Laparoscopic Suturing Versus Bipolar Coagulation on Ovarian Reserve in Patients Undergoing Endometriotic Ovarian Cystectomy.

NCT03989856 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2019-06-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In women undergoing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy which is less harmfull on the ovarian reserve (electrocoagulation or suturing).

Conditions

  • Ovary Injury

Interventions

DEVICE

2-0 polyglican absorbable sutures

The sutures will be performed with intracorporeal knots using 2-0 polyglican absorbable sutures (Vicryl; Ethicon Inc., New Jersey, USA). Suture is performed using needle holders for the closure of ovarian parenchyma and controlling bleeding. Bleeding from ovarian hilus will only resolve by suturing.

DEVICE

Diathermy

bipolar coagulation technique will be used to control significant bleeding (40 W current; Richard Wolf, Germany). I

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ain Shams University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohamed Abd elfattah elsenitt, Lecturer · Ain Shams University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-03-15
Primary Completion
2019-09-20
Completion
2019-09-20

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03989856 on ClinicalTrials.gov