MedTrace Logo

Endoscopic Approaches To The Maxillary Sinus: A Comparative Study

NCT03962413 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2020-05-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of endoscopic pre lacrimal recess approach, canine fossa approach and middle meatal antrostomy approach regarding:

1. Assessment of the accessibility of each approach to visualize and reach the different walls and recesses of the maxillary sinus.
2. Any intraoperative or postoperative complications.
3. Any post-operative recurrence or residue detected by endoscopic examination or by MSCT scan.

Conditions

  • Maxillary Sinus Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Endoscopic Approaches To Maxillary Sinus

The first group (group A): The middle meatal antrostomy approach. The second group (group B): The endoscopic prelacrimal recess approach The third group (group c): The canine fossa approach.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • ahmed ae abdelwahab, professor · Assiut University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-10-01
Primary Completion
2021-09-01
Completion
2021-10-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03962413 on ClinicalTrials.gov