Trial Outcomes & Findings for Behavioral Economics and Adherence in Teens (BEAT!) (NCT NCT03958331)

NCT ID: NCT03958331

Last Updated: 2022-09-23

Results Overview

A total mean adherence rates will be calculated based on daily adherence rates captured through the SimpleMed Pillboxes or AdhereTech bottles. Scores range from 0-100%, with higher scores representing better adherence.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

104 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Month 7

Results posted on

2022-09-23

Participant Flow

We had a run-in period, in which 64 participants were not randomized to either control or treatment groups. The primary participants in this study were adolescents and caregivers did not receive the intervention. Caregivers completed parental permission (consent) forms, demographic information related to their child and provided data for two of the secondary outcomes.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Control Group
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individualized Adherence Feedback Report: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Treatment Group
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy
Not Randomized (High Adherence)
This group demonstrated adherence rates of \>95% and thus were not randomized to either treatment arm per protocol
Overall Study
STARTED
21
19
64
Overall Study
COMPLETED
14
17
47
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
7
2
17

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Control Group
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individualized Adherence Feedback Report: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Treatment Group
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy
Not Randomized (High Adherence)
This group demonstrated adherence rates of \>95% and thus were not randomized to either treatment arm per protocol
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
3
1
5
Overall Study
Weaned from medicine
2
0
0
Overall Study
Withdrawn by study staff due to non-compliance with study procedures
2
1
12

Baseline Characteristics

Behavioral Economics and Adherence in Teens (BEAT!)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Control Group
n=21 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individualized Adherence Feedback Report: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Treatment Group
n=19 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy
Not Randomized
n=64 Participants
No interventions were provided to these participants as they demonstrated high adherence and were not eligible for randomization based on the run-in period.
Total
n=104 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
15.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=99 Participants
14.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=107 Participants
15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=206 Participants
15.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
38 Participants
n=206 Participants
55 Participants
n=7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
10 Participants
n=107 Participants
26 Participants
n=206 Participants
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
n=99 Participants
18 Participants
n=107 Participants
62 Participants
n=206 Participants
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
15 Participants
n=107 Participants
58 Participants
n=206 Participants
86 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
Monotherapy versus Polytherapy
Monotherapy
21 Participants
n=99 Participants
17 Participants
n=107 Participants
61 Participants
n=206 Participants
99 Participants
n=7 Participants
Monotherapy versus Polytherapy
Polytherapy
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
Monotherapy versus Polytherapy
Unknown
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
Seizure Type
Focal
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
9 Participants
n=206 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
Seizure Type
Generalized
14 Participants
n=99 Participants
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
46 Participants
n=206 Participants
69 Participants
n=7 Participants
Seizure Type
Unclassified
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
Seizure Type
Unknown
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
Seizures in the Past 3 months
No
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
39 Participants
n=206 Participants
65 Participants
n=7 Participants
Seizures in the Past 3 months
Yes
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
14 Participants
n=206 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
Seizures in the Past 3 months
Unknown
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
11 Participants
n=206 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
Family Insurance
Private
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
17 Participants
n=107 Participants
43 Participants
n=206 Participants
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
Family Insurance
Public
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
18 Participants
n=206 Participants
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
Family Insurance
Public and Private
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
Family Insurance
Not insured
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
Primary Caregiver
Mother/Stepmother
16 Participants
n=99 Participants
16 Participants
n=107 Participants
51 Participants
n=206 Participants
83 Participants
n=7 Participants
Primary Caregiver
Father/Stepfather
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
Primary Caregiver
Other: Grandmother, Uncle, Aunt
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
Primary Caregiver
Unknown
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
11 Participants
n=206 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 7

Population: Adherence data missing for 2 participants

A total mean adherence rates will be calculated based on daily adherence rates captured through the SimpleMed Pillboxes or AdhereTech bottles. Scores range from 0-100%, with higher scores representing better adherence.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=19 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individualized Adherence Feedback Report: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Treatment Group
n=19 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy
Electronically Monitored Adherence
45.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.0
50.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 9

The Global Assessment of Severity of Epilepsy (GASE) is a one item clinician-rated measure of seizure severity. The total score ranges from 1-7, with higher scores representing more severe epilepsy

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=13 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individualized Adherence Feedback Report: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Treatment Group
n=15 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy
Seizure Severity-Clinician Report
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 9

Population: The number of participants analyzed does not match the participant flow as some participants did not complete this particular measure.

The Seizure Severity Scale-Adapted for Children is a caregiver-reported questionnaire, which is 9-items and assess seizure severity, including intrusiveness, frequency, length, and disruptiveness of seizures. A total score is calculated, ranging from 0-3, with higher scores representing worse seizure severity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=12 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individualized Adherence Feedback Report: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Treatment Group
n=16 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy
Seizure Severity-Parent Report
0.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
1.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 9

The PedsQL-Epilepsy Module is a 29 item measure with several subscales (Impact, Cognitive, Executive Functioning, Sleep, Mood/Behavior) will be used. Scores range from 0-100 for each subscale, with higher scores representing better quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=13 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individualized Adherence Feedback Report: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Treatment Group
n=16 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy
PedsQL Epilepsy Module - Parent Report
Impact (parent)
83.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.5
78.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.0
PedsQL Epilepsy Module - Parent Report
Cognitive (parent)
63.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.9
72.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.8
PedsQL Epilepsy Module - Parent Report
Sleep (parent)
60.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.1
65.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.2
PedsQL Epilepsy Module - Parent Report
Executive functioning (parent)
71.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.2
72.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.9
PedsQL Epilepsy Module - Parent Report
Mood/Behavior (parent)
66.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.5
67.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 9-month

Population: The flow diagram differs in sample size as one less adolescent completed this measure. Thus, the sample size is n=12.

The PedsQL Epilepsy Module is a 29-item health-related quality of life instrument with five subscales, including Impact, Cognitive, Executive Functioning, Sleep, and Mood/Behavior). Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores representing better quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=12 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individualized Adherence Feedback Report: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Treatment Group
n=16 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy
PedsQL Epilepsy Module-Adolescent Report
Impact
80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.5
82.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.7
PedsQL Epilepsy Module-Adolescent Report
Cognitive
73.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.9
71.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.1
PedsQL Epilepsy Module-Adolescent Report
Sleep
56.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.4
67.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.2
PedsQL Epilepsy Module-Adolescent Report
Executive Functioning
75.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.5
65.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.7
PedsQL Epilepsy Module-Adolescent Report
Mood/Behavior
65.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.1
71.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Month 7

Population: Participant numbers are lower than the Participant Flow data as some participants did not complete this particular measure.

Adolescents completed this study specific Satisfaction measure, which was 23-items. This measure assesses satisfaction with the intervention content, relevance, helpfulness, and ease of use. Assessment of perceptions of the impact of what was learned from the intervention were also assessed. Eighteen of the items used a Likert format with the following ratings: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree. A total scale was calculated for the 18 items, which ranges from 18-72, with higher scores reflecting higher satisfaction. Finally, five open-ended items assessing what was most and least helpful about the intervention, what changes adolescents want to see in the intervention, and any additional input.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=13 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individualized Adherence Feedback Report: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Treatment Group
n=17 Participants
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy
Satisfaction-Teen Report Total Score
53.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
50.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.0

Adverse Events

Control Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Treatment Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Control Group
n=21 participants at risk
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individualized Adherence Feedback Report: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors
Treatment Group
n=19 participants at risk
Automated reminders and individualized adherence feedback reports with social norms comparisons Automated Digital Reminders: Reminders from electronic monitors via texts or alarms/lights Individual Adherence Feedback Report with Social Norms: Feedback report on individual adherence behaviors compared to other adolescents with epilepsy
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy monitoring unit/overnight EEG
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
We collected this data through medical chart review
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 4 • 9 months
We collected this data through medical chart review
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
We collected this data through medical chart review
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
We collected this data through medical chart review
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear tube removal/myringoplasty
0.00%
0/21 • 9 months
We collected this data through medical chart review
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
We collected this data through medical chart review
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal Ideation
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
We collected this data through medical chart review
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • 9 months
We collected this data through medical chart review

Additional Information

Dr. Avani Modi

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Phone: 513-636-4864

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place