Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of the Precision and Sensitivity of Tilmanocept Uptake Value (TUV) on Tc 99m Tilmanocept Planar Imaging (NCT NCT03938636)
NCT ID: NCT03938636
Last Updated: 2023-08-24
Results Overview
The camera-specific precision of TUVjoint in subjects with active RA and Healthy Controls (HCs), which is described as the Root Mean Square Difference (RMSD) between the 15-minute planar images (referred to as A and B images at 60 and 180 minutes). The RMSD is calculated as the square root of the mean squared deviation from zero.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
116 participants
Day 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes (60A) and 75 minutes (60B) and at 180 minutes (180A) and 195 minutes (180B).
2023-08-24
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
Arm 1 comprises disease-free HCs. Arm 1 was designed to evaluate image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and to collect normative HC data.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
Arm 2 comprises clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 was designed to evaluate image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα Therapy
Arm 3 comprises clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment who are candidates for initiation of, or change to, new anti-TNFα therapy. Arm 3 was designed to assess the efficacy of global TUVs, obtained before and after initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy, to predict future clinical responsiveness to the new therapy.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
44
|
41
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
44
|
38
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
Arm 1 comprises disease-free HCs. Arm 1 was designed to evaluate image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and to collect normative HC data.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
Arm 2 comprises clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 was designed to evaluate image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα Therapy
Arm 3 comprises clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment who are candidates for initiation of, or change to, new anti-TNFα therapy. Arm 3 was designed to assess the efficacy of global TUVs, obtained before and after initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy, to predict future clinical responsiveness to the new therapy.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Subject withdrew due to death in family
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Missed visit
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation of the Precision and Sensitivity of Tilmanocept Uptake Value (TUV) on Tc 99m Tilmanocept Planar Imaging
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
n=44 Participants
Arm 1 comprised disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data.
Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
n=41 Participants
Arm 2 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects Who Are Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα Therapy
n=31 Participants
Arm 3 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment who were candidates for new anti-TNFα therapy. Arm 3 assessed the efficacy of global TUVs, obtained before and after initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy, to predict future clinical responsiveness to the new therapy.
Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
Total
n=116 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
44 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
97 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
36.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.98 • n=39 Participants
|
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.19 • n=41 Participants
|
57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.68 • n=35 Participants
|
49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.28 • n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
26 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
31 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
17 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
24 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
44 participants
n=39 Participants
|
41 participants
n=41 Participants
|
31 participants
n=35 Participants
|
116 participants
n=31 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes (60A) and 75 minutes (60B) and at 180 minutes (180A) and 195 minutes (180B).Population: Planned interim analysis of first 15 subjects in Arms 1 and 2
The camera-specific precision of TUVjoint in subjects with active RA and Healthy Controls (HCs), which is described as the Root Mean Square Difference (RMSD) between the 15-minute planar images (referred to as A and B images at 60 and 180 minutes). The RMSD is calculated as the square root of the mean squared deviation from zero.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
n=15 Participants
Arm 1 comprised disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
n=15 Participants
Arm 2 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.159 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.11 to 0.23
|
0.067 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.091 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.14
|
0.124 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.09 to 0.19
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.087 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.13
|
0.125 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.09 to 0.19
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.094 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.14
|
0.130 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.09 to 0.2
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.077 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.12
|
0.070 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.09
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.078 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.11
|
0.080 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.058 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.04 to 0.09
|
0.066 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.064 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
0.099 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.14
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.080 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.12
|
0.077 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.11
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.050 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.03 to 0.07
|
0.043 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.03 to 0.07
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left wrist, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.089 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.13
|
0.086 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.13
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.124 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.08 to 0.17
|
0.083 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.11
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.096 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.14
|
0.165 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.12 to 0.25
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.097 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.15
|
0.152 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.11 to 0.23
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.058 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.04 to 0.09
|
0.069 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.067 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
0.062 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.090 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.14
|
0.095 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.14
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.080 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.12
|
0.070 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.11
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.062 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
0.059 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.04 to 0.09
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.084 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.12
|
0.095 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.14
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.048 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.04 to 0.07
|
0.111 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.08 to 0.17
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right wrist 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B
|
0.070 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
0.097 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.15
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.119 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.09 to 0.18
|
0.113 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.08 to 0.17
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.086 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.13
|
0.167 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.11 to 0.23
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.090 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.14
|
0.097 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.14
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.110 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.14
|
0.106 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.08 to 0.16
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.097 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.13
|
0.114 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.08 to 0.18
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.071 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.04 to 0.09
|
0.106 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.08 to 0.16
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.050 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.03 to 0.07
|
0.075 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.11
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.057 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.04 to 0.08
|
0.131 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.09 to 0.2
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.068 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
0.083 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.13
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.077 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
0.073 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.11
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Left wrist, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.085 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.11
|
0.137 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.09 to 0.18
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.079 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.12
|
0.109 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.08 to 0.16
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.097 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.15
|
0.184 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.13 to 0.27
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.083 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.13
|
0.138 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.1 to 0.2
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.103 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.14
|
0.105 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.08 to 0.16
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.076 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.1
|
0.078 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.12
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.065 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.05 to 0.09
|
0.107 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.14
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.086 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.13
|
0.088 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.13
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.056 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.04 to 0.08
|
0.125 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.09 to 0.19
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.048 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.03 to 0.07
|
0.099 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.07 to 0.15
|
|
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV
Right wrist, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B
|
0.087 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.06 to 0.11
|
0.163 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.11 to 0.22
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes and 180 minutes.Population: Planned interim analysis of first 15 subjects in Arms 1 and 2
The stability of the mean/variance relationship, which is assessed by comparing the Coefficient of Variation (CV) of TUVjoint and TUVglobal in subjects with active RA and in healthy control subjects at 60 and 180 minutes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
n=15 Participants
Arm 1 comprised disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
n=15 Participants
Arm 2 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Global TUV at 60 min
|
263.31 Coefficient of variation
|
208.79 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min
|
16.92295 Coefficient of variation
|
13.189704 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min
|
19.613096 Coefficient of variation
|
20.477108 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min
|
18.651035 Coefficient of variation
|
16.378147 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min
|
18.511573 Coefficient of variation
|
13.970308 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min
|
21.20135 Coefficient of variation
|
12.21378 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min
|
12.819593 Coefficient of variation
|
11.370952 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min
|
17.553684 Coefficient of variation
|
9.7087077 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min
|
17.847881 Coefficient of variation
|
12.604637 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min
|
17.407371 Coefficient of variation
|
15.660407 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min
|
14.424961 Coefficient of variation
|
10.066291 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left wrist TUV at 60 min
|
14.401304 Coefficient of variation
|
8.7901247 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min
|
13.628956 Coefficient of variation
|
11.48462 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min
|
19.774959 Coefficient of variation
|
18.014491 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min
|
20.228576 Coefficient of variation
|
23.49369 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min
|
18.728588 Coefficient of variation
|
18.207621 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min
|
19.283062 Coefficient of variation
|
12.958136 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min
|
14.308134 Coefficient of variation
|
11.080537 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min
|
18.710387 Coefficient of variation
|
12.508548 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min
|
14.969821 Coefficient of variation
|
12.831644 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min
|
18.369256 Coefficient of variation
|
16.271218 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min
|
18.873772 Coefficient of variation
|
16.805949 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right wrist TUV at 60 min
|
13.05914 Coefficient of variation
|
10.202857 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Global TUV at 180 min
|
355.82 Coefficient of variation
|
287.80 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min
|
19.4363 Coefficient of variation
|
12.081512 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min
|
21.914899 Coefficient of variation
|
19.814146 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min
|
24.269644 Coefficient of variation
|
15.786226 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min
|
23.438328 Coefficient of variation
|
17.776583 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min
|
21.045602 Coefficient of variation
|
14.647724 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min
|
18.335106 Coefficient of variation
|
15.40672 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min
|
19.144279 Coefficient of variation
|
10.324402 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min
|
16.707115 Coefficient of variation
|
11.347808 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min
|
20.968296 Coefficient of variation
|
11.384086 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min
|
15.155009 Coefficient of variation
|
12.16714 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Left wrist TUV at 180 min
|
17.46611 Coefficient of variation
|
10.10065 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min
|
18.333323 Coefficient of variation
|
12.726762 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min
|
19.876281 Coefficient of variation
|
16.017255 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min
|
19.314268 Coefficient of variation
|
19.791295 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min
|
21.176376 Coefficient of variation
|
18.332795 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min
|
21.480266 Coefficient of variation
|
13.444692 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min
|
16.290041 Coefficient of variation
|
10.408102 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min
|
18.330801 Coefficient of variation
|
11.916304 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min
|
17.515896 Coefficient of variation
|
10.748883 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min
|
20.621393 Coefficient of variation
|
16.172441 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min
|
18.927298 Coefficient of variation
|
14.872591 Coefficient of variation
|
|
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship
Right wrist TUV at 180 min
|
16.823037 Coefficient of variation
|
10.559086 Coefficient of variation
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Imaging (60 minutes after tilmanocept injection) on Day 0 and at 5 weeks after new therapy initiation; Assessment of CDAI and ACR Response Criteria at 12 and 24 weeks after new therapy initiation.Population: All Arm 3 subjects with data at the specified timepoint (Week 12 or Week 24)
The Kendall rank correlation of the change in global TUV from baseline to 5 weeks (ΔTUVglobal\[5w\]) and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy defined by the change from baseline of CDAI to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks (ΔCDAI12w and ΔCDAI24w).• The Kendall rank correlation of ΔTUVglobal\[5w\] and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy from baseline to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks defined by ACR Response Criteria (ΔACR12w and ΔACR24w)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
n=29 Participants
Arm 1 comprised disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
Arm 2 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔCDAI12w (overall) - Reader 1
|
0.248 Kendall rank correlation
Interval 0.003 to 0.494
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔCDAI12w (overall) - Reader 2
|
0.238 Kendall rank correlation
Interval 0.002 to 0.474
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔCDAI24w (overall) - Reader 1
|
0.115 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.221 to 0.452
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔCDAI24w (overall) - Reader 2
|
0.121 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.207 to 0.449
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 1
|
0.165 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.077 to 0.407
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 2
|
0.154 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.096 to 0.405
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ACR24w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 1
|
0.226 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.024 to 0.476
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 2
|
0.235 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.013 to 0.483
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 1
|
0.119 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.152 to 0.389
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 2
|
0.138 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.124 to 0.399
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 1
|
0.161 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.146 to 0.469
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 2
|
0.194 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.11 to 0.499
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (ESR) - Reader 1
|
-0.199 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.506 to 0.107
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (ESR) - Reader 2
|
-0.110 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.412 to 0.192
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (ESR) - Reader 1
|
-0.267 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.588 to 0.053
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (ESR) - Reader 2
|
-0.186 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.493 to 0.121
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 1
|
0.110 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.153 to 0.374
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 2
|
0.105 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.153 to 0.362
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 1
|
-0.125 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.447 to 0.197
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 2
|
-0.121 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.433 to 0.19
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 1
|
0.299 Kendall rank correlation
Interval 0.108 to 0.49
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 2
|
0.261 Kendall rank correlation
Interval 0.037 to 0.484
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 1
|
0.051 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.257 to 0.359
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 2
|
0.070 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.226 to 0.366
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 1
|
0.137 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.09 to 0.365
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 2
|
0.115 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.117 to 0.348
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 1
|
-0.057 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.349 to 0.234
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 2
|
-0.032 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.323 to 0.259
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (HAQ-DI Score) - Reader 1
|
0.025 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.237 to 0.286
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (HAQ-DI Score) - Reader 2
|
0.083 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.167 to 0.333
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (HAQ-DI Score) - Reader 1
|
-0.032 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.339 to 0.276
|
—
|
|
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy
ΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (HAQ-DI Score) - Reader 2
|
0.051 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.227 to 0.329
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Imaging (60 minutes after tilmanocept injection) on Day 0 and Day 8Population: All Arm 2 subjects with evaluable images at Days 0 and 8
Longitudinal (8-day) variation of TUV analyzed for each DAS28 joint, defined as the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and 95% confidence interval for the RMSD for each joint at Day 0 vs Day 8
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
n=35 Participants
Arm 1 comprised disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
Arm 2 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.183 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.147 to 0.237
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.135 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.109 to 0.175
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.151 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.122 to 0.196
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.221 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.174 to 0.28
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.179 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.145 to 0.234
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.235 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.186 to 0.299
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.263 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.213 to 0.342
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.198 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.16 to 0.257
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.172 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.139 to 0.224
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.229 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.185 to 0.298
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.233 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.181 to 0.291
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.107 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.084 to 0.135
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.142 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.115 to 0.185
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.134 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.109 to 0.175
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.131 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.106 to 0.171
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.208 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.167 to 0.268
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.213 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.167 to 0.269
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.221 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.176 to 0.283
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.227 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.182 to 0.292
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.212 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.169 to 0.271
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.261 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.206 to 0.332
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.244 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.196 to 0.315
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view
|
0.078 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.063 to 0.102
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.180 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.137 to 0.219
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.170 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.137 to 0.221
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.148 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.119 to 0.191
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.130 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.104 to 0.168
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.180 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.142 to 0.228
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.346 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.277 to 0.445
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.245 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.198 to 0.318
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.160 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.129 to 0.208
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.202 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.163 to 0.262
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.242 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.193 to 0.31
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.106 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.079 to 0.126
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.137 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.109 to 0.175
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.120 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.096 to 0.154
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.124 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.099 to 0.16
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.159 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.128 to 0.206
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.165 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.133 to 0.213
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.237 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.192 to 0.309
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.172 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.138 to 0.222
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.219 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.178 to 0.286
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.271 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.215 to 0.345
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view
|
0.084 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.062 to 0.098
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.251 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.203 to 0.326
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.229 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.182 to 0.293
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.225 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.18 to 0.29
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.224 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.182 to 0.292
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.357 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.289 to 0.465
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.303 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.245 to 0.395
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.254 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.199 to 0.321
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.251 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.203 to 0.326
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.240 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.187 to 0.3
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.313 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.254 to 0.408
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.180 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.146 to 0.234
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.288 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.233 to 0.375
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.214 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.173 to 0.278
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.143 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.114 to 0.183
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.188 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.149 to 0.239
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.247 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.195 to 0.314
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.307 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.249 to 0.4
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.253 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.204 to 0.328
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.221 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.178 to 0.286
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.246 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.2 to 0.321
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.367 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.297 to 0.477
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view
|
0.133 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.108 to 0.173
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.112 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.087 to 0.139
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.112 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.09 to 0.144
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.105 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.085 to 0.136
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.109 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.088 to 0.142
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.152 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.123 to 0.198
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.227 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.18 to 0.29
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.133 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.108 to 0.173
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.205 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.161 to 0.259
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.281 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.221 to 0.356
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Left wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.081 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.062 to 0.099
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.149 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.12 to 0.194
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.141 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.111 to 0.179
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.132 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.107 to 0.173
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.137 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.109 to 0.175
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.165 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.134 to 0.215
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
1.834 Pixel intensity
Interval 1.471 to 2.365
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.178 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.144 to 0.231
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.199 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.16 to 0.257
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.200 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.162 to 0.26
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.215 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.174 to 0.279
|
—
|
|
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV
Right wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view
|
0.081 Pixel intensity
Interval 0.065 to 0.104
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Images obtained 60 minutes after tilmanocept injection on Day 0.Population: Healthy control subjects with evaluable scans. Unevaluable scans included those with poor hand placement/positioning and low signal (overlapping with background) in most of the fingers.
The normal range of tilmanocept uptake values (TUVs) in hand and wrist joints of healthy control subjects, expressed as the mean and standard deviation. TUV is defined as the average pixel intensity of the region of interest (hand or wrist joint) divided by the average pixel intensity of the reference region (includes the region from one wrist region of interest diameter above the wrist region of interest down to the fingertips)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
n=29 Participants
Arm 1 comprised disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
Arm 2 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
1.01 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.213
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
1.20 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.257
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
1.05 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.185
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
1.33 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.200
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.85 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.169
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.92 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.180
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.86 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.158
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
1.00 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.170
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.79 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.158
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.90 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.197
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.86 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.186
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
1.04 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.174
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.77 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.192
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.90 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.201
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.80 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.144
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
1.01 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.161
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.73 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.186
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.82 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.189
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.80 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.162
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Metacarpophalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.92 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.169
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.75 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.158
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.89 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.192
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.79 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.175
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.93 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.166
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.71 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.170
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.77 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.179
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.68 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.129
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.79 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.155
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.70 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.184
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.73 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.192
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.69 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.126
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.82 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.146
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.66 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.143
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.72 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.167
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.64 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.128
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.75 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.156
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.59 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.147
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.66 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.59 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.124
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.69 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.135
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Wrist, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
1.32 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.229
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Wrist, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
1.48 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.243
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Wrist, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
1.40 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.183
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Left Wrist, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
1.66 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.180
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.98 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.185
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
1.17 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.244
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
1.04 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.190
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
1.29 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.297
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.87 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.180
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.88 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.181
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.94 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.206
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
1.00 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.182
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.83 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.176
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.91 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.191
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.86 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.143
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
1.02 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.189
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.83 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.214
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.94 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.216
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.83 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
1.02 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.199
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.74 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.174
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.86 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.212
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.78 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.156
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Metacarpophalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.96 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.200
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.79 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.162
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.89 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.198
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.80 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.161
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.95 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.155
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.68 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.140
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.75 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.159
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.73 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.114
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.79 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.129
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.66 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.164
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.73 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.183
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.71 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.118
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.80 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.139
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.67 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.196
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.73 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.172
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.65 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.132
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.73 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.142
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
0.58 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.141
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
0.66 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.135
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
0.55 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.093
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
0.66 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.122
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Wrist, Anterior View, Reader 1
|
1.35 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.221
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Wrist, Anterior View, Reader 2
|
1.51 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.253
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Wrist, Posterior View, Reader 1
|
1.41 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.188
|
—
|
|
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint
Right Wrist, Posterior View, Reader 2
|
1.65 Pixel intensity
Standard Deviation 0.264
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: A SPECT/CT scan was performed at approximately 210 minutes after the tilmanocept injection on Day 8 of the trial.Population: All Arm 2 subjects who received SPECT/CT scan
Percent of Arm 2 subjects who had SPECT/CT scans who were determined to have bone involvement rather than localization within the synovial space of the hands and wrists
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
n=20 Participants
Arm 1 comprised disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
Arm 2 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Qualitative Evaluations of SPECT/CT as an Indication of Bone Involvement Rather Than Localization Within the Synovial Space in the Hands and Wrists of Arm 2 Subjects
|
0 Percent of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Images were obtained 60 minutes after tilmanocept injection on Day 0. New anti-TNFα therapy was initiated after completion of Day 0 procedures. CDAI and ACR were assessed on Day 0 and again 12 and 24 weeks after initiation of new anti-TNFα therapy.Population: All Arm 3 subjects with data at the specified timepoint (Week 12 or Week 24)
The correlation of the TUVglobal\[baseline\] and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy defined by the change from baseline (CFB) of CDAI to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks (ΔCDAI12w and ΔCDAI24w, respectively) and by ACR Response Criteria (ACR12w and ACR24w, respectively).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
n=29 Participants
Arm 1 comprised disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
Arm 2 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔCDAI12w (overall) - Reader 1
|
-0.045 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.32 to 0.229
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔCDAI24w (overall) - Reader 1
|
0.072 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.215 to 0.359
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 1
|
-0.100 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.387 to 0.186
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 1
|
-0.067 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.391 to 0.258
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 1
|
-0.086 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.317 to 0.144
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 1
|
0.130 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.171 to 0.43
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (ESR) - Reader 1
|
-0.176 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.473 to 0.12
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (ESR) - Reader 1
|
-0.261 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.471 to -0.051
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 1
|
-0.099 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.292 to 0.093
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 1
|
-0.062 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.303 to 0.178
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 1
|
-0.096 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.393 to 0.201
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 1
|
-0.070 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.323 to 0.183
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 1
|
0.121 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.212 to 0.454
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 1
|
0.057 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.254 to 0.369
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔCDAI12w (overall) - Reader 2
|
-0.029 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.299 to 0.241
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔCDAI24w (overall) - Reader 2
|
0.109 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.176 to 0.393
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 2
|
-0.073 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.356 to 0.21
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 2
|
-0.025 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.349 to 0.298
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 2
|
-0.057 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.298 to 0.184
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 2
|
0.175 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.131 to 0.482
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (ESR) - Reader 2
|
-0.145 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.454 to 0.165
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (ESR) - Reader 2
|
-0.234 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.468 to 0.001
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 2
|
-0.110 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.303 to 0.083
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 2
|
-0.028 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.263 to 0.207
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 2
|
-0.096 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.384 to 0.192
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 2
|
-0.038 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.295 to 0.219
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 2
|
0.110 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.223 to 0.443
|
—
|
|
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)
TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 2
|
0.064 Kendall rank correlation
Interval -0.251 to 0.379
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
RA Subjects Who Are Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα Therapy
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
n=44 participants at risk
Arm 1 included inflammatory-disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data.
Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
n=41 participants at risk
Arm 2 included clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects Who Are Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα Therapy
n=31 participants at risk
Arm 3 included clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment who were candidates for new anti-TNFα therapy. Arm 3 assessed the efficacy of global TUVs, obtained before and after initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy, to predict future clinical responsiveness to the new therapy.
Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
n=44 participants at risk
Arm 1 included inflammatory-disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data.
Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
n=41 participants at risk
Arm 2 included clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
RA Subjects Who Are Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα Therapy
n=31 participants at risk
Arm 3 included clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment who were candidates for new anti-TNFα therapy. Arm 3 assessed the efficacy of global TUVs, obtained before and after initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy, to predict future clinical responsiveness to the new therapy.
Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous floaters
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Eye disorders
Hordeolum
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site bruising
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Corona virus infection
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed mood
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Knee arthroplasty
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/44 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
0.00%
0/41 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place