Trial Outcomes & Findings for Collaborating to Implement Cross-System Interventions in Child Welfare and Substance Use (NCT NCT03931005)
NCT ID: NCT03931005
Last Updated: 2026-04-07
Results Overview
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - 4 survey items that assess participants' agreement about the degree to which they perceive the intervention to be acceptable. Participants rate their agreement along a 5 point scale, where 1= completely disagree and 5= completely agree. Scores from the four items will be averaged where higher scores denote greater perceived acceptability. (Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., … Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(108), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3)
COMPLETED
NA
9 participants
One time point (Post-test only), 8 weeks after presenting the toolkit
2026-04-07
Participant Flow
Implementation Technical Assistance Providers contracted to support implementation of Ohio START as of January 2024.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CASPI
Use of the Collaborating Across Systems for Program Implementation (CASPI) toolkit to facilitate implementation support.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Collaborating to Implement Cross-System Interventions in Child Welfare and Substance Use
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CASPI
n=9 Participants
Use of the Collaborating Across Systems for Program Implementation (CASPI) toolkit to facilitate implementation support.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
|
9 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
9 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
9 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=527 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: One time point (Post-test only), 8 weeks after presenting the toolkitAcceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - 4 survey items that assess participants' agreement about the degree to which they perceive the intervention to be acceptable. Participants rate their agreement along a 5 point scale, where 1= completely disagree and 5= completely agree. Scores from the four items will be averaged where higher scores denote greater perceived acceptability. (Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., … Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(108), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CASPI
n=9 Participants
Use of the Collaborating Across Systems for Program Implementation (CASPI) toolkit to facilitate implementation support.
|
|---|---|
|
Perceived Acceptability
|
4.3 Scale points
Standard Deviation .65
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: One time point (Post-test only), 8 weeks after introducing the toolkitIntervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - 4 survey items that assess participants' agreement about the degree to which they perceive the intervention to be appropriate. Participants rate their agreement along a 5 point scale, where 1= completely disagree and 5= completely agree. Scores from the four items will be averaged where higher scores denote greater perceived appropriateness. (Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., … Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(108), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CASPI
n=9 Participants
Use of the Collaborating Across Systems for Program Implementation (CASPI) toolkit to facilitate implementation support.
|
|---|---|
|
Perceived Appropriateness
|
4.1 Scale points
Standard Deviation .58
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: One time point (Post-test only), 8 weeks after introducing the toolkitFeasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - 4 survey items that assess participants' agreement about the degree to which they perceive the intervention to be feasible. Participants rate their agreement along a 5 point scale, where 1= completely disagree and 5= completely agree. Scores from the four items will be averaged where higher scores denote greater perceived feasibility. (Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., … Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(108), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CASPI
n=9 Participants
Use of the Collaborating Across Systems for Program Implementation (CASPI) toolkit to facilitate implementation support.
|
|---|---|
|
Perceived Feasibility
|
4.1 Scale points
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
Adverse Events
Decision-Support
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place