Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of Heat on Rivastigmine TDS Products (NCT NCT03915626)
NCT ID: NCT03915626
Last Updated: 2022-04-04
Results Overview
Blood samples were obtained at the following time points: -60 min (before patch application) and then 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 5 h 15 min, 5 h 30 min, 5 h 45 min, 6 h, 6 h 15 min, 6 h 30 min, 6 h 45 min, 7 h, 7 h 30 min, 8 h, 8 h 30 min, 9 h, 9 h 15 min, 9 h 30 min, 10 h, 11 h, 12 h post patch administration.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
7 participants
0-12 hours for each subject for each of the four study sessions
2022-04-04
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Rivastigmine RLD and Generic Patches
Session 1: RLD patch worn for 9 hours, then at least one week wash out period, Session 2: Generic patch worn for 9 hours, then at least one week wash out period, Session 3: RLD patch worn for 9 hours includes 90 minute heat application (5 h-6 h 30 min), then at least one week wash out period Session 4: Generic patch worn for 9 hours includes 90 minute heat application (5 h-6 h 30 min)
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Rivastigmine RLD and Generic Patches
Session 1: RLD patch worn for 9 hours, then at least one week wash out period, Session 2: Generic patch worn for 9 hours, then at least one week wash out period, Session 3: RLD patch worn for 9 hours includes 90 minute heat application (5 h-6 h 30 min), then at least one week wash out period Session 4: Generic patch worn for 9 hours includes 90 minute heat application (5 h-6 h 30 min)
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
study was halted due to COVID-19; once started again volunteer could no longer participate
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Effect of Heat on Rivastigmine TDS Products
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Rivastigmine RLD and Generic Patches
n=7 Participants
Session 1: RLD patch worn for 9 hours, then at least one week wash out period, Session 2: Generic patch worn for 9 hours, then at least one week wash out period, Session 3: RLD patch worn for 9 hours includes 90 minute heat application (5 h-6 h 30 min), then at least one week wash out period Session 4: Generic patch worn for 9 hours includes 90 minute heat application (5 h-6 h 30 min)
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
28.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.43 • n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
7 participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-12 hours for each subject for each of the four study sessionsBlood samples were obtained at the following time points: -60 min (before patch application) and then 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 5 h 15 min, 5 h 30 min, 5 h 45 min, 6 h, 6 h 15 min, 6 h 30 min, 6 h 45 min, 7 h, 7 h 30 min, 8 h, 8 h 30 min, 9 h, 9 h 15 min, 9 h 30 min, 10 h, 11 h, 12 h post patch administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RLD Patch
n=6 Participants
RLD rivastigmine patch (4.6 mg/24 hours); worn for 9 hours
Rivastigmine (RLD) transdermal patch: brand name patch
|
Generic Patch
n=6 Participants
generic rivastigmine patch (4.6 mg/24 hours); worn for 9 hours
Rivastigmine (generic) transdermal patch: generic patch
|
RLD Patch With Heat
n=6 Participants
RLD rivastigmine patch (4.6 mg/24 hours); worn for 9 hours; 90 min heat application
Rivastigmine (RLD) transdermal patch: brand name patch
|
Generic Patch With Heat
n=6 Participants
generic rivastigmine patch (4.6 mg/24 hours); worn for 9 hours; 90 min heat application
Rivastigmine (generic) transdermal patch: generic patch
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-12 Hours
|
19.99 ng*h/mL
Standard Deviation 14.35
|
19.22 ng*h/mL
Standard Deviation 11.41
|
19.22 ng*h/mL
Standard Deviation 11.41
|
16.57 ng*h/mL
Standard Deviation 9.66
|
Adverse Events
RLD Patch
Generic Patch
RLD Patch With Heat
Generic Patch With Heat
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
RLD Patch
n=7 participants at risk
RLD rivastigmine patch (4.6 mg/24 hours); worn for 9 hours
Rivastigmine (RLD) transdermal patch: brand name patch
|
Generic Patch
n=7 participants at risk
generic rivastigmine patch (4.6 mg/24 hours); worn for 9 hours
Rivastigmine (generic) transdermal patch: generic patch
|
RLD Patch With Heat
n=6 participants at risk
RLD rivastigmine patch (4.6 mg/24 hours); worn for 9 hours; 90 min heat application
Rivastigmine (RLD) transdermal patch: brand name patch
|
Generic Patch With Heat
n=6 participants at risk
generic rivastigmine patch (4.6 mg/24 hours); worn for 9 hours; 90 min heat application
Rivastigmine (generic) transdermal patch: generic patch
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/7 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Decreased heart rate
|
0.00%
0/7 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Increased heart rate
|
0.00%
0/7 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Decreased blood pressure
|
42.9%
3/7 • Number of events 3 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Increased blood pressure
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
|
Investigations
SOMNOLENCE (SLEEPINESS)
|
0.00%
0/7 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ERYTHEMA (skin reddening)
|
100.0%
7/7 • Number of events 7 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
100.0%
7/7 • Number of events 7 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 6 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
100.0%
6/6 • Number of events 6 • Subjects were observed for the 12 hours during product administration and then were followed up with a phone call up to 72 h after product removal; ~4 days for each of the four study sessions.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Audra L. Stinchcomb
University of Maryland, Baltimore School of Pharmacy
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place