Trial Outcomes & Findings for Agonist-Antagonist Myoneural Interface for Functional Limb Restoration After Transtibial Amputation (NCT NCT03913273)
NCT ID: NCT03913273
Last Updated: 2026-02-17
Results Overview
The stability of joint position control in free space is quantified by the number of the distinct synergy activations (distinct movements) achieved out of a total of four targeted movements of interest: (1) ankle plantar flexion (toe down), (2) dorsiflexion (toe up), (3) subtalar joint eversion (sole of foot outward), and (4) subtalar joint inversion (sole of foot inward). For each movement, the subject is asked attempt the movement while the distinct synergy activation/neural signals are quantified using electromyography (EMG) data. An outcome of 4 indicates that the subject was able to produce distinct activations for each of the 4 targeted movements. An outcome of less than 4 indicates that although a subject attempted the movement, they were not able to successfully produce distinct activations for some portion of the targeted movements.
COMPLETED
NA
14 participants
1 time point, post-amputation
2026-02-17
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention Group
Intervention: AMI transtibial amputation
AMI transtibial amputation: Two Agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) were surgically constructed during a modified transtibial amputation procedure. Each AMI was made of natively innervated and vascularized muscle segments - an agonist and antagonist - that were surgically connected in series within the amputated residuum. Tarsal tunnels, including segments of each tunnel's native tendon component, were procured from the amputated joint. The tunnels were affixed to the residual limb tibia and the AMIs were constructed by coaptation of an agonist and an antagonist muscle to either end of the tendon passing through the tunnel. Consequently, the force produced by one muscle stretches its partner such that the AMI can communicate signals from the mechanoreceptors in both muscles to the central nervous system.
|
Control Group
Intervention: Standard transtibial amputation
Standard transtibial amputation: A standard transtibial amputation was performed according to traditional techniques. No surgical construction of agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) was performed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
7
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
7
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: AMI transtibial amputation
AMI transtibial amputation: Two Agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) were surgically constructed during a modified transtibial amputation procedure. Each AMI was made of natively innervated and vascularized muscle segments - an agonist and antagonist - that were surgically connected in series within the amputated residuum. Tarsal tunnels, including segments of each tunnel's native tendon component, were procured from the amputated joint. The tunnels were affixed to the residual limb tibia and the AMIs were constructed by coaptation of an agonist and an antagonist muscle to either end of the tendon passing through the tunnel. Consequently, the force produced by one muscle stretches its partner such that the AMI can communicate signals from the mechanoreceptors in both muscles to the central nervous system.
|
Control Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: Standard transtibial amputation
Standard transtibial amputation: A standard transtibial amputation was performed according to traditional techniques. No surgical construction of agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) was performed.
|
Total
n=14 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Amputation Type
agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) modified transtibial amputation
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Amputation Type
Conventional transtibial amputation
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Amputation Type
Ertl osteomyoplasty transtibial amputation
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 time point, post-amputationPopulation: Subjects in the intervention group had received an agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) modified transtibial amputation. Subjects in the control group had either received a conventional or Ertl osteomyoplasty transtibial amputation. The participants and research team were not blinded to the testing conditions. Participants were proficient in the use of standard passive prostheses and were capable of ambulation with variable cadence (K level 3 and 4).
The stability of joint position control in free space is quantified by the number of the distinct synergy activations (distinct movements) achieved out of a total of four targeted movements of interest: (1) ankle plantar flexion (toe down), (2) dorsiflexion (toe up), (3) subtalar joint eversion (sole of foot outward), and (4) subtalar joint inversion (sole of foot inward). For each movement, the subject is asked attempt the movement while the distinct synergy activation/neural signals are quantified using electromyography (EMG) data. An outcome of 4 indicates that the subject was able to produce distinct activations for each of the 4 targeted movements. An outcome of less than 4 indicates that although a subject attempted the movement, they were not able to successfully produce distinct activations for some portion of the targeted movements.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: AMI transtibial amputation
AMI transtibial amputation: Two Agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) were surgically constructed during a modified transtibial amputation procedure. Each AMI was made of natively innervated and vascularized muscle segments - an agonist and antagonist - that were surgically connected in series within the amputated residuum. Tarsal tunnels, including segments of each tunnel's native tendon component, were procured from the amputated joint. The tunnels were affixed to the residual limb tibia and the AMIs were constructed by coaptation of an agonist and an antagonist muscle to either end of the tendon passing through the tunnel. Consequently, the force produced by one muscle stretches its partner such that the AMI can communicate signals from the mechanoreceptors in both muscles to the central nervous system.
|
Control Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: Standard transtibial amputation
Standard transtibial amputation: A standard transtibial amputation was performed according to traditional techniques. No surgical construction of agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) was performed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stability of Joint Position Control in Free Space
|
4 Distinct synergy activations
Standard Deviation 0
|
3.1 Distinct synergy activations
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 time point, post-amputationPopulation: Subjects in the intervention group had received an agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) modified transtibial amputation. Subjects in the control group had either received a conventional or Ertl osteomyoplasty transtibial amputation. The participants and research team were not blinded to the testing conditions. Participants were proficient in the use of standard passive prostheses and were capable of ambulation with variable cadence (K level 3 and 4).
The economy of motion is computed as the total travel distance through synergy space, normalized by the minimum possible/most direct travel path, to reflect control efficiency. Given this definition, the economy of motion indicates the trajectory straightness of movements that were produced to achieve the target discrete movements. For this study, the movements were ankle plantar-dorsiflexion and subtalar inversion-eversion. An outcome of 100% represents how the two movements together could allow for an economy of the targeted movements in that space, indicating perfect economy of motion. The percentage may decrease if a subject achieves the targeted movements in a less efficient manner. For these movements, the economy of motion was evaluated under increasing time constraints from 2.0 s to 1.5 s, 1 s, 0.8 s, and 0.5 s.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: AMI transtibial amputation
AMI transtibial amputation: Two Agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) were surgically constructed during a modified transtibial amputation procedure. Each AMI was made of natively innervated and vascularized muscle segments - an agonist and antagonist - that were surgically connected in series within the amputated residuum. Tarsal tunnels, including segments of each tunnel's native tendon component, were procured from the amputated joint. The tunnels were affixed to the residual limb tibia and the AMIs were constructed by coaptation of an agonist and an antagonist muscle to either end of the tendon passing through the tunnel. Consequently, the force produced by one muscle stretches its partner such that the AMI can communicate signals from the mechanoreceptors in both muscles to the central nervous system.
|
Control Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: Standard transtibial amputation
Standard transtibial amputation: A standard transtibial amputation was performed according to traditional techniques. No surgical construction of agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) was performed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Economy of Motion for Free Space Movements
2 second Constraint
|
72.42 Percent (%) of efficiency in movement
Standard Deviation 3.55
|
69.38 Percent (%) of efficiency in movement
Standard Deviation 4.09
|
|
Economy of Motion for Free Space Movements
1.5 second Constraint
|
73.03 Percent (%) of efficiency in movement
Standard Deviation 5.18
|
70.29 Percent (%) of efficiency in movement
Standard Deviation 3.75
|
|
Economy of Motion for Free Space Movements
1 second Constraint
|
73.29 Percent (%) of efficiency in movement
Standard Deviation 3.95
|
69.02 Percent (%) of efficiency in movement
Standard Deviation 2.85
|
|
Economy of Motion for Free Space Movements
0.8 second Constraint
|
72.67 Percent (%) of efficiency in movement
Standard Deviation 2.70
|
69.18 Percent (%) of efficiency in movement
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
|
Economy of Motion for Free Space Movements
0.5 second Constraint
|
71.88 Percent (%) of efficiency in movement
Standard Deviation 3.95
|
66.96 Percent (%) of efficiency in movement
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 time point, post-amputationPopulation: Subjects in the intervention group had received an agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) modified transtibial amputation. Subjects in the control group had either received a conventional or Ertl osteomyoplasty transtibial amputation. The participants and research team were not blinded to the testing conditions. Participants were proficient in the use of standard passive prostheses and were capable of ambulation with variable cadence (K level 3 and 4).
To address the clinical trial aim of determining whether AMIs can improve prosthetic terrain adaptations, we assessed swing phase control during stair descent by measuring the capability of the neuroprosthesis to exhibit prosthetic ankle joint plantar flexion characteristic of stair descent. This metric was defined as the change in ankle joint angle from terminal stance to terminal swing, capturing the user's ability to distinctly control joint angle transitions across gait phases of stair descent. For further details see: H. Song, T.-H. Hsieh, S. H. Yeon, T. Shu, M. Nawrot, C. F. Landis, G. N. Friedman, E. A. Israel, S. Gutierrez-Arango, M. J. Carty, L. E. Freed, H. M. Herr, Continuous neural control of a bionic limb restores biomimetic gait after amputation. Nat Med 30, 2010-2019 (2024).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: AMI transtibial amputation
AMI transtibial amputation: Two Agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) were surgically constructed during a modified transtibial amputation procedure. Each AMI was made of natively innervated and vascularized muscle segments - an agonist and antagonist - that were surgically connected in series within the amputated residuum. Tarsal tunnels, including segments of each tunnel's native tendon component, were procured from the amputated joint. The tunnels were affixed to the residual limb tibia and the AMIs were constructed by coaptation of an agonist and an antagonist muscle to either end of the tendon passing through the tunnel. Consequently, the force produced by one muscle stretches its partner such that the AMI can communicate signals from the mechanoreceptors in both muscles to the central nervous system.
|
Control Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: Standard transtibial amputation
Standard transtibial amputation: A standard transtibial amputation was performed according to traditional techniques. No surgical construction of agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) was performed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Late Swing Ankle Plantar Flexion During Stair Descent
|
-15.65 Degrees
Standard Deviation 6.82
|
-6.27 Degrees
Standard Deviation 4.36
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 time point, post-amputationPopulation: Subjects in the intervention group had received an agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) modified transtibial amputation. Subjects in the control group had either received a conventional or Ertl osteomyoplasty transtibial amputation. The participants and research team were not blinded to the testing conditions. Participants were proficient in the use of standard passive prostheses and were capable of ambulation with variable cadence (K level 3 and 4).
To address the clinical trial aim of determining whether AMIs can improve prosthetic terrain adaptations, we assessed swing phase control during stair ascent by measuring the capability of the neuroprosthesis to exhibit prosthetic ankle joint dorsiflexion characteristic of stair ascent. This metric was defined as the change in ankle joint angle from terminal stance to terminal swing, capturing the user's ability to distinctly control joint angle transitions across gait phases of stair ascent. For further details see: H. Song, T.-H. Hsieh, S. H. Yeon, T. Shu, M. Nawrot, C. F. Landis, G. N. Friedman, E. A. Israel, S. Gutierrez-Arango, M. J. Carty, L. E. Freed, H. M. Herr, Continuous neural control of a bionic limb restores biomimetic gait after amputation. Nat Med 30, 2010-2019 (2024).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: AMI transtibial amputation
AMI transtibial amputation: Two Agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) were surgically constructed during a modified transtibial amputation procedure. Each AMI was made of natively innervated and vascularized muscle segments - an agonist and antagonist - that were surgically connected in series within the amputated residuum. Tarsal tunnels, including segments of each tunnel's native tendon component, were procured from the amputated joint. The tunnels were affixed to the residual limb tibia and the AMIs were constructed by coaptation of an agonist and an antagonist muscle to either end of the tendon passing through the tunnel. Consequently, the force produced by one muscle stretches its partner such that the AMI can communicate signals from the mechanoreceptors in both muscles to the central nervous system.
|
Control Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: Standard transtibial amputation
Standard transtibial amputation: A standard transtibial amputation was performed according to traditional techniques. No surgical construction of agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) was performed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Late Swing Ankle Dorsiflexion During Stair Ascent
|
19.27 Degrees
Standard Deviation 3.51
|
4.05 Degrees
Standard Deviation 5.54
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 time point, post-amputationPopulation: Subjects in the intervention group had received an agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) modified transtibial amputation. Subjects in the control group had either received a conventional or Ertl osteomyoplasty transtibial amputation. The participants and research team were not blinded to the testing conditions. Participants were proficient in the use of standard passive prostheses and were capable of ambulation with variable cadence (K level 3 and 4).
Correlation of Ankle Joint Proprioception was measured by applying functional electrical stimulation (FES) to either the tibialis anterior (TA) or lateral gastrocnemius (LG) and instructing the subject to resist the experienced movement. The level of correlation (R2) for both dorsiflexion and plantarflexion between the applied stimulation current and the subjects perceived joint counter-torque for the intervention subjects was compared to control subjects.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: AMI transtibial amputation
AMI transtibial amputation: Two Agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) were surgically constructed during a modified transtibial amputation procedure. Each AMI was made of natively innervated and vascularized muscle segments - an agonist and antagonist - that were surgically connected in series within the amputated residuum. Tarsal tunnels, including segments of each tunnel's native tendon component, were procured from the amputated joint. The tunnels were affixed to the residual limb tibia and the AMIs were constructed by coaptation of an agonist and an antagonist muscle to either end of the tendon passing through the tunnel. Consequently, the force produced by one muscle stretches its partner such that the AMI can communicate signals from the mechanoreceptors in both muscles to the central nervous system.
|
Control Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: Standard transtibial amputation
Standard transtibial amputation: A standard transtibial amputation was performed according to traditional techniques. No surgical construction of agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) was performed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation of Ankle Joint Proprioception
Plantar Flexion
|
0.82 R² or the coefficient of determination
Interval 0.67 to 0.97
|
0.5 R² or the coefficient of determination
Interval 0.17 to 0.82
|
|
Correlation of Ankle Joint Proprioception
Dorsiflexion
|
0.77 R² or the coefficient of determination
Interval 0.58 to 0.95
|
0.41 R² or the coefficient of determination
Interval 0.06 to 0.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 time point, post-amputationPopulation: Subjects in the intervention group had received an agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) modified transtibial amputation. Subjects in the control group had either received a conventional or Ertl osteomyoplasty transtibial amputation. The participants and research team were not blinded to the testing conditions. Participants were proficient in the use of standard passive prostheses and were capable of ambulation with variable cadence (K level 3 and 4).
We analyzed the correlation (R2) between agonist contraction and antagonist stretch during dorsi and plantar flexion movements. Muscle fascicle strains were estimated from ultrasound data recorded from the agonist and antagonist muscles (e.g. lateral gastrocnemius (LG) and tibialis anterior (TA) during plantar flexion). Fascicle measurements were generated via optical tracking software. In the AMI subjects, because of the mechanical coupling of the agonist and antagonist muscles within the residual limb, a volitional contraction of the agonist muscle inherently induces a passive stretch in the corresponding antagonist muscle. On the other hand, in the control subjects, because the residual muscles are not coapted, we expected to find limited stretch in the antagonist muscle during agonist contraction. With limited stretch in the antagonist from an agonist contraction, perceived joint movement would be lowered from antagonist stretch afferents.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: AMI transtibial amputation
AMI transtibial amputation: Two Agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) were surgically constructed during a modified transtibial amputation procedure. Each AMI was made of natively innervated and vascularized muscle segments - an agonist and antagonist - that were surgically connected in series within the amputated residuum. Tarsal tunnels, including segments of each tunnel's native tendon component, were procured from the amputated joint. The tunnels were affixed to the residual limb tibia and the AMIs were constructed by coaptation of an agonist and an antagonist muscle to either end of the tendon passing through the tunnel. Consequently, the force produced by one muscle stretches its partner such that the AMI can communicate signals from the mechanoreceptors in both muscles to the central nervous system.
|
Control Group
n=7 Participants
Intervention: Standard transtibial amputation
Standard transtibial amputation: A standard transtibial amputation was performed according to traditional techniques. No surgical construction of agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs) was performed.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Controllability Over Prosthetic Joint Dorsi and Plantar Flexion
Dorsiflexion
|
0.41 R² or the coefficient of determination
Interval 0.06 to 0.76
|
0.14 R² or the coefficient of determination
Interval -0.15 to 0.43
|
|
Controllability Over Prosthetic Joint Dorsi and Plantar Flexion
Plantar Flexion
|
0.24 R² or the coefficient of determination
Interval -0.1 to 0.58
|
0.15 R² or the coefficient of determination
Interval -0.15 to 0.42
|
Adverse Events
Intervention Group
Control Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place