MedTrace Logo

Compare the Hemostatic Effectiveness of Chitosan Gauze With Traditional Gauze on Open Wound on 10 Participants.

NCT03907111 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10

Last updated 2019-04-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study recruited 10 subject participants to compare the hemostasis gauze made by chitosan with traditional cotton gauze to see which one is better in bleeding time, bleeding volume, wound infection and wound healing speed when it is used in open wound treatment.

Conditions

  • Hemostasis

Interventions

DEVICE

Chitosan Gauze

Gauze made by chitosan material

DEVICE

placebo

traditional gauze

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan

    collaborator OTHER

  • Tri-Service General Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-10-02
Primary Completion
2015-12-31
Completion
2016-02-10

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03907111 on ClinicalTrials.gov