Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Maralixibat in Subjects With Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis (MARCH-PFIC) (NCT NCT03905330)
NCT ID: NCT03905330
Last Updated: 2023-12-11
Results Overview
The primary efficacy endpoint is the mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score between baseline and Weeks 15-26, using 4-week average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity scores (Mixed Model Repeated Measures). The baseline average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score is defined as the 4-week average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score prior to the first dose of the study medication. ItchRo(Obs) Severity Score = Itch Reported Outcome Observer assessment severity score; scale between 0 (not itchy at all) and 4 (extremely itchy); the lower the score the better.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
93 participants
MMRM model was used with inputs of the average changes from baseline (BL) to Weeks 1-6, 7-10, 11-14, 15-18, 19-22, 23-26, and other covariates. The average change from BL over Weeks 15-26 is calculated in the model and presented as a single number.
2023-12-11
Participant Flow
A total of 93 participants were enrolled at 29 sites in 16 countries (Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, France, Germany, Italy, Lebanon, Mexico, Poland, Singapore, Turkey, United Kingdom, and United States).
The screening period starts when informed consent (or assent as applicable) is signed. The duration of the screening period is up to 6 weeks during which all procedures listed for the screening visit must be completed. A total of 125 patients were screened for the study. 32 of these patients were screen failures.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Maralixibat
Maralixibat up to 600 mcg/kg twice daily
|
Placebo
Corresponding placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
47
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
Dosed 150 ug/kg BID
|
47
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Dosed 300 ug/kg BID
|
46
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Dosed 450 ug/kg BID
|
45
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Dosed 600 ug/kg BID
|
45
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
44
|
42
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Maralixibat
n=47 Participants
After a screening period of up to 6 weeks, subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either maralixibat or placebo. The Dose Escalation period (4-6 weeks) was followed by a stable dosing period (20-22 weeks) and a 7 days Safety Follow-up period for subjects discontinuing early and for subjects not enrolling into the extension Study MRX-503.
|
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Participants received a corresponding placebo.
|
Total
n=93 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
All subjects · <=18 years
|
47 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
46 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
93 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Categorical
All subjects · Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Categorical
All subjects · >=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Primary Cohort · <=18 years
|
14 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
17 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
31 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Primary Cohort · Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Primary Cohort · >=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Categorical
PFIC cohort · <=18 years
|
33 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
31 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
64 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Categorical
PFIC cohort · Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Categorical
PFIC cohort · >=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Continuous
All subjects
|
4.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.15 • n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
4.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.57 • n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
4.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.85 • n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Continuous
Primary Cohort
|
6.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.24 • n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
4.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.56 • n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
5.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.45 • n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Age, Continuous
PFIC Cohort
|
4.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.10 • n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
4.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.61 • n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
4.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.85 • n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
All subjects · Female
|
27 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
24 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
51 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
All subjects · Male
|
20 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
22 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
42 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Primary Cohort · Female
|
7 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
11 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
18 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Primary Cohort · Male
|
7 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
6 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
13 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
PFIC Cohort · Female
|
16 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
18 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
34 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
PFIC Cohort · Male
|
17 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
13 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
30 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
All subjects · Hispanic or Latino
|
18 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
17 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
35 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
All subjects · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
28 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
27 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
55 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
All subjects · Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
2 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Primary Cohort · Hispanic or Latino
|
9 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
7 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
16 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Primary Cohort · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
5 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
9 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
14 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Primary Cohort · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
1 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
PFIC Cohort · Hispanic or Latino
|
16 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
13 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
29 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
PFIC Cohort · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
17 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
16 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
33 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
PFIC Cohort · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
2 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
2 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
All subjects · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
3 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
4 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
All subjects · Asian
|
3 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
All subjects · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
All subjects · Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
2 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
All subjects · White
|
36 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
34 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
70 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
All subjects · More than one race
|
3 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
4 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
All subjects · Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=47 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
2 Participants
n=46 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary Cohort · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
3 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
3 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
6 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary Cohort · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary Cohort · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary Cohort · Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
2 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
3 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary Cohort · White
|
9 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
9 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
18 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary Cohort · More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
2 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
3 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Primary Cohort · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
1 Participants
n=17 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
PFIC Cohort · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
3 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
4 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
7 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
PFIC Cohort · Asian
|
3 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
3 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
PFIC Cohort · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
0 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
PFIC Cohort · Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
2 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
3 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
PFIC Cohort · White
|
24 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
19 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
43 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
PFIC Cohort · More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
4 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
6 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
PFIC Cohort · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
2 Participants
n=31 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
2 Participants
n=64 Participants • The primary cohort and PFIC cohort are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the primary cohort is fully contained in the PFIC cohort. The total population (n=93) consists of the primary cohort (n=31), the additional subjects in the PFIC cohort (n=33) and an additional 29 subjects for whom we did not run any primary or secondary efficacy analyses.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
|
2 participants
n=47 Participants
|
1 participants
n=46 Participants
|
3 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Austria
|
1 participants
n=47 Participants
|
1 participants
n=46 Participants
|
2 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
3 participants
n=47 Participants
|
0 participants
n=46 Participants
|
3 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
7 participants
n=47 Participants
|
3 participants
n=46 Participants
|
10 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
1 participants
n=47 Participants
|
1 participants
n=46 Participants
|
2 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
|
2 participants
n=47 Participants
|
4 participants
n=46 Participants
|
6 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
1 participants
n=47 Participants
|
2 participants
n=46 Participants
|
3 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
1 participants
n=47 Participants
|
1 participants
n=46 Participants
|
2 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
2 participants
n=47 Participants
|
4 participants
n=46 Participants
|
6 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Lebanon
|
6 participants
n=47 Participants
|
8 participants
n=46 Participants
|
14 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
|
3 participants
n=47 Participants
|
5 participants
n=46 Participants
|
8 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
4 participants
n=47 Participants
|
2 participants
n=46 Participants
|
6 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
|
2 participants
n=47 Participants
|
0 participants
n=46 Participants
|
2 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
|
1 participants
n=47 Participants
|
1 participants
n=46 Participants
|
2 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
2 participants
n=47 Participants
|
0 participants
n=46 Participants
|
2 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
9 participants
n=47 Participants
|
13 participants
n=46 Participants
|
22 participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: MMRM model was used with inputs of the average changes from baseline (BL) to Weeks 1-6, 7-10, 11-14, 15-18, 19-22, 23-26, and other covariates. The average change from BL over Weeks 15-26 is calculated in the model and presented as a single number.Population: Primary Cohort, defined as participants with genetic testing results consistent with biallelic disease causing variation in ABCB11 (PFIC2, also referred to as BSEP deficiency), based on standard-of-care genotyping, excluding those PFIC2 participants predicted to have complete absence of BSEP function (PFIC2 participants with heterozygosis, biliary diversion, having low or fluctuating sBA levels).
The primary efficacy endpoint is the mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score between baseline and Weeks 15-26, using 4-week average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity scores (Mixed Model Repeated Measures). The baseline average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score is defined as the 4-week average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score prior to the first dose of the study medication. ItchRo(Obs) Severity Score = Itch Reported Outcome Observer assessment severity score; scale between 0 (not itchy at all) and 4 (extremely itchy); the lower the score the better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Primary Cohort Maralixibat
n=14 Participants
Participants received Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 microgram per kilogram \[mcg/kg\]) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
Maralixibat: Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 mcg/kg) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
Primary Cohort Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to maralixibat oral solution twice daily for 26 weeks.
Placebo: Placebo matching to maralixibat orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in the Average Morning ItchRO(Obs) Severity Score in the Primary Cohort
|
-1.718 Score on a scale
Interval -2.272 to -1.163
|
-0.628 Score on a scale
Interval -1.136 to -0.121
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and average of Weeks 18, 22 and 26Population: Primary Cohort, defined as participants with genetic testing results consistent with biallelic disease causing variation in ABCB11 (PFIC2, also referred to as BSEP deficiency), based on standard-of-care genotyping, excluding those PFIC2 participants predicted to have complete absence of BSEP function (PFIC2 participants with heterozygosis, biliary diversion, having low or fluctuating sBA levels). Two maralixibat participants did not have baseline sBA values and were not included in the analysis.
Mean change in total sBA level between baseline and average of Weeks 18, 22 and 26.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Primary Cohort Maralixibat
n=12 Participants
Participants received Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 microgram per kilogram \[mcg/kg\]) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
Maralixibat: Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 mcg/kg) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
Primary Cohort Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to maralixibat oral solution twice daily for 26 weeks.
Placebo: Placebo matching to maralixibat orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Total sBA Level in the Primary Cohort.
|
-175.536 μmol/L
Interval -256.716 to -94.356
|
11.187 μmol/L
Interval -58.073 to 80.446
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Between Baseline and Week 15 through Week 26Population: Primary cohort plus PFIC1, PFIC3, PFIC4, PFIC6.
Mean change in the average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity score between baseline and Week 15 through Week 26 in participants with PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6). ItchRo(Obs) Severity Score = Itch Reported Outcome Observer assessment severity score; scale between 0 (not itchy at all) and 4 (extremely itchy); the lower the score the better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Primary Cohort Maralixibat
n=33 Participants
Participants received Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 microgram per kilogram \[mcg/kg\]) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
Maralixibat: Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 mcg/kg) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
Primary Cohort Placebo
n=31 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to maralixibat oral solution twice daily for 26 weeks.
Placebo: Placebo matching to maralixibat orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in the Average Morning ItchRO(Obs) Severity Score in Participants With PFIC (PFIC1, Nt-PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6)
|
-1.811 score on a scale
Interval -2.178 to -1.444
|
-0.610 score on a scale
Interval -1.0 to -0.221
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Between Baseline and average of Weeks 18, 22 and 26Population: Primary cohort plus PFIC1, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6.
Mean change in total sBA level between baseline and average of Weeks 18, 22, and 26 in participants with PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Primary Cohort Maralixibat
n=33 Participants
Participants received Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 microgram per kilogram \[mcg/kg\]) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
Maralixibat: Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 mcg/kg) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
Primary Cohort Placebo
n=31 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to maralixibat oral solution twice daily for 26 weeks.
Placebo: Placebo matching to maralixibat orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Total sBA Level in Participants With PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6)
|
-157.489 μmol/L
Interval -200.276 to -114.703
|
2.913 μmol/L
Interval -42.32 to 48.146
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 15 to Week 26 using the average value from the three 4-week periods (Weeks 15-18, 19-22 and 23-26)Population: Primary Cohort, defined as participants with genetic testing results consistent with biallelic disease causing variation in ABCB11 (PFIC2, also referred to as BSEP deficiency), based on standard-of-care genotyping, excluding those PFIC2 participants predicted to have complete absence of BSEP function (PFIC2 participants with heterozygosis, biliary diversion, having low or fluctuating sBA levels).
Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) responders from Week 15 to Week 26 in participants with PFIC2 using the average value from the three 4-week periods (Weeks 15-18, 19-22 and 23-26). The number in the Subject Analysis Set refers to the number of responders. ItchRO responders are defined as a subject having a 4-week average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity change from baseline of ≤-1.0 or an average severity score of ≤1.0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Primary Cohort Maralixibat
n=14 Participants
Participants received Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 microgram per kilogram \[mcg/kg\]) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
Maralixibat: Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 mcg/kg) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
Primary Cohort Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to maralixibat oral solution twice daily for 26 weeks.
Placebo: Placebo matching to maralixibat orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) Responders in the Primary Cohort
|
8 Number of responders
|
4 Number of responders
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Average value from Weeks 18, 22 and 26Population: Primary Cohort, defined as participants with genetic testing results consistent with biallelic disease causing variation in ABCB11 (PFIC2, also referred to as BSEP deficiency), based on standard-of-care genotyping, excluding those PFIC2 participants predicted to have complete absence of BSEP function (PFIC2 participants with heterozygosis, biliary diversion, having low or fluctuating sBA levels).
Proportion of sBA responders from Week 18 to Week 26 in participants with PFIC2, using the average value from Weeks 18, 22 and 26 values. The number in the Subject Analysis Set refers to the number of responders. sBA responders are defined as a subject having an average sBA level of \<102 umol/L (applies only if baseline sBA level was ≥102 umol/L), OR a ≤-75% average percent change from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Primary Cohort Maralixibat
n=14 Participants
Participants received Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 microgram per kilogram \[mcg/kg\]) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
Maralixibat: Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 mcg/kg) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
Primary Cohort Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to maralixibat oral solution twice daily for 26 weeks.
Placebo: Placebo matching to maralixibat orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of sBA Responders in the Primary Cohort
|
5 Number of responders
|
1 Number of responders
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 15 to Week 26Population: Primary cohort plus PFIC1, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6.
Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) responders from Week 15 to Week 26 in participants with PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6). The number in the Subject Analysis Set refers to the number of responders. ItchRO responders are defined as a subject having a 4-week average morning ItchRO(Obs) severity change from baseline of ≤-1.0 OR an average severity score of ≤1.0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Primary Cohort Maralixibat
n=33 Participants
Participants received Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 microgram per kilogram \[mcg/kg\]) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
Maralixibat: Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 mcg/kg) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
Primary Cohort Placebo
n=31 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to maralixibat oral solution twice daily for 26 weeks.
Placebo: Placebo matching to maralixibat orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of ItchRO(Obs) Responders PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6)
|
21 Number of responders
|
8 Number of responders
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 18 to Week 26Population: Primary cohort plus PFIC1, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6.
Proportion of sBA responders from Week 18 to Week 26 in participants with PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6). The number in the Subject Analysis Set refers to the number of responders. sBA responders are defined as a subject having an average sBA level of \<102 umol/L (applies only if baseline sBA level was ≥102 umol/L), or a ≤-75% average percent change from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Primary Cohort Maralixibat
n=33 Participants
Participants received Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 microgram per kilogram \[mcg/kg\]) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
Maralixibat: Maralixibat oral solution (up to 600 mcg/kg) orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
Primary Cohort Placebo
n=31 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to maralixibat oral solution twice daily for 26 weeks.
Placebo: Placebo matching to maralixibat orally twice daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of sBA Responders PFIC (PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC3, PFIC4 and PFIC6)
|
15 Number of responders
|
2 Number of responders
|
Adverse Events
Maralixibat
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Maralixibat
n=47 participants at risk
All participants who received at least 1 dose of maralixibat
|
Placebo
n=46 participants at risk
All participants who received at least 1 dose of placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental exposure to product
|
0.00%
0/47 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Coagulopathy
|
0.00%
0/47 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/47 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.00%
0/47 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 4 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
0.00%
0/46 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin K deficiency
|
0.00%
0/47 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Maralixibat
n=47 participants at risk
All participants who received at least 1 dose of maralixibat
|
Placebo
n=46 participants at risk
All participants who received at least 1 dose of placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
14.9%
7/47 • Number of events 7 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
8.7%
4/46 • Number of events 4 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
12.8%
6/47 • Number of events 7 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Number of events 3 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Investigations
Vitamin E decreased
|
8.5%
4/47 • Number of events 4 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Number of events 3 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Investigations
Vitamin D decreased
|
8.5%
4/47 • Number of events 4 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Investigations
International normalised ratio increased
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
8.7%
4/46 • Number of events 5 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
36.2%
17/47 • Number of events 19 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
28.3%
13/46 • Number of events 20 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
57.4%
27/47 • Number of events 51 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
19.6%
9/46 • Number of events 16 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
21.3%
10/47 • Number of events 16 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Number of events 4 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
10.9%
5/46 • Number of events 7 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 3 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
8.7%
4/46 • Number of events 4 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
8.5%
4/47 • Number of events 4 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 3 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
0.00%
0/47 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
10.9%
5/46 • Number of events 5 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
17.0%
8/47 • Number of events 11 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
10.9%
5/46 • Number of events 5 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
14.9%
7/47 • Number of events 9 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
10.9%
5/46 • Number of events 8 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
10.6%
5/47 • Number of events 5 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
17.4%
8/46 • Number of events 10 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 6 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
13.0%
6/46 • Number of events 10 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
12.8%
6/47 • Number of events 9 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Coronavirus infection
|
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
8.7%
4/46 • Number of events 5 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
10.6%
5/47 • Number of events 8 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 3 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 4 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D deficiency
|
8.5%
4/47 • Number of events 5 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
8.7%
4/46 • Number of events 5 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin E deficiency
|
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
8.7%
4/46 • Number of events 4 • Baseline to end of treatment (EOT); where EOT can be up to 26 weeks if participant did not early terminate.
The Study Protocol did not require to collect Adverse Events by dose level.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60