Closure After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Prineo vs Dermabond

NCT03899753 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1

Last updated 2023-07-03

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The objective is to compare two types of wound closure after total shoulder arthroplasty to determine which closure is faster, and subsequently if there are different outcomes between the two types of closures.

The objective of this study is to compare two types of wound closure after total shoulder arthroplasty procedures. A single fellowship trained shoulder surgeon will perform all procedures. It is hypothesized that participants who undergo an 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (OCA) mesh closure will have a faster closure time, lower cost, non-inferior complication rate, and non-inferior satisfaction scores with respect postoperative follow up and scar appearance.

Participants in the OCA mesh cohort will be compared to participants who have a closure with a running monocryl suture and dermabond. This investigation seeks to determine if OCA closure mesh closure is non-inferior to monocryl suture and dermabond in terms of operative time, cost, complications, and aesthetic appearance.

If the hypothesis is confirmed, this study will suggest that a OCA mesh closure may be used for total shoulder arthroplasty surgeries as an alternative to current conventional closures and may provide a cost benefit.

Conditions

  • Shoulder Arthritis
  • Shoulder Arthropathy Associated With Other Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate and Mesh

2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate and a mesh will be applied to final closure of wounds after undergoing a Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

DEVICE

2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate

Incisions will be closed with 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate after undergoing a Total shoulder arthroplasty

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Montefiore Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Konrad Gruson, MD · Montefiore Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
100 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-12-31
Primary Completion
2021-04-21
Completion
2021-04-21
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03899753 on ClinicalTrials.gov