Trial Outcomes & Findings for Diagnostic Ultrasound for Measuring Fat of the Body (NCT NCT03871556)
NCT ID: NCT03871556
Last Updated: 2023-09-28
Results Overview
Will use diagnostic ultrasound to measure fat thickness
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
NA
Target enrollment
40 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
through study completion, 1 day
Results posted on
2023-09-28
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Experimental Group
LOGIQ P6 Diagnostic Ultrasound: Ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Diagnostic Ultrasound for Measuring Fat of the Body
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Experimental Group
n=40 Participants
LOGIQ P6 Diagnostic Ultrasound: Ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Age · 20-30
|
15 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age · 31-40
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age · 41-50
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age · 51-60
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age · 61-70
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Education
Some high school or less
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Education
High school diploma/GED
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Education
Vocational school or some college, including 2 years degree
|
14 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Education
4-year college degree
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Education
Professional or graduate degree
|
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Job status
Full time
|
35 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Job status
Part time
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Job status
Self-employed
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Job status
Unemployed
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Job status
Retired
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Job status
Homemaker
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Job status
Other
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Less than 18.5
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
18.5-24.9
|
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
25.0-29.9
|
15 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
30 or higher
|
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: through study completion, 1 dayWill use diagnostic ultrasound to measure fat thickness
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Male
n=18 Participants
LOGIQ P6 Diagnostic Ultrasound: Ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness
|
Female
n=22 Participants
LOGIQ P6 Diagnostic Ultrasound: Ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Right inner thigh
|
.88 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .63
|
1.41 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .57
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Chin
|
.56 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .27
|
.60 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .14
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Left arm
|
.83 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .59
|
1.65 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .57
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Right arm
|
.82 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .51
|
1.72 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .58
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Left back
|
.77 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .44
|
1.30 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .45
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Right back
|
.86 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .51
|
1.20 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .52
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Left flank
|
1.31 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .58
|
1.81 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .47
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Right flank
|
1.16 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .55
|
1.83 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .47
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Abdomen
|
1.71 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .70
|
2.19 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .61
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Left inner thigh
|
.86 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .58
|
1.40 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .57
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Left outer thigh
|
1.47 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .63
|
2.45 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
|
Difference in Thickness of Subcutaneous Fat at Different Anatomic Sites on the Body
Right outer thigh
|
1.19 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .63
|
2.22 average fat measurement (cm)
Standard Deviation .57
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: through study completion, 1 dayWill use diagnostic ultrasound to measure fat thickness and a questionnaire to assess subject perceptions of their body using a 10-point Likert scale (1= very unsatisfied, 10= very satisfied)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Male
n=18 Participants
LOGIQ P6 Diagnostic Ultrasound: Ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness
|
Female
n=22 Participants
LOGIQ P6 Diagnostic Ultrasound: Ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gender Differences on Patient Perceptions of Body Image With Measured Fat Distribution
Chin
|
8.48 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
5.14 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 3.47
|
|
Gender Differences on Patient Perceptions of Body Image With Measured Fat Distribution
Inner arms
|
7.41 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 2.45
|
4.02 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 3.22
|
|
Gender Differences on Patient Perceptions of Body Image With Measured Fat Distribution
Upper back
|
7.90 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
5.18 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
|
Gender Differences on Patient Perceptions of Body Image With Measured Fat Distribution
Flanks
|
6.48 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
3.45 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 2.97
|
|
Gender Differences on Patient Perceptions of Body Image With Measured Fat Distribution
Abdomen
|
5.98 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
2.93 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 3.12
|
|
Gender Differences on Patient Perceptions of Body Image With Measured Fat Distribution
Inner thigh
|
7.58 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
5.04 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 3.62
|
|
Gender Differences on Patient Perceptions of Body Image With Measured Fat Distribution
Outer thigh
|
7.91 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 2.25
|
5.93 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 3.15
|
|
Gender Differences on Patient Perceptions of Body Image With Measured Fat Distribution
Overall
|
7.28 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
4.70 average satisfaction level
Standard Deviation 2.24
|
Adverse Events
Experimental Group
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place